Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair

A comparison of linear versus circular closure

Kenneth Kesler, A. C. Fiore, K. S. Naunheim, T. G. Sharp, Y. Mahomed, T. W. Zollinger, Stephen Sawada, John Brown, A. J. Labovitz, H. B. Barner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of ventricular closure techniques, we reviewed our experience with 62 patients who survived the repair of aneurysms of the anterior wall of the left ventricular from 1984 through 1989. Forty of these patients underwent aneurysm repair by standard linear closure and 22 by a circular closure technique. After a mean follow-up interval of 3 years, there were no demonstrable differences in angina class, New York Heart Association functional classification, or survival. In 41 surviving patients, postoperative left ventricular dimensions and function were satisfactorily evaluated by standard echocardiographic measurements. No significant differences were found in postoperative long-axis left ventricular systolic diameter or in short-axis systolic or diastolic areas. There was a significantly larger long-axis diastolic diameter in the circular closure group; however, there was no difference in this parameter when the ratios of postoperative to preoperative lengths were compared. Further intragroup comparisons demonstrated an increase in short-axis areas postoperatively within the circular closure group in contrast to a decrease in patients in the linear closure group; these changes were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in postoperative ejection fraction between the two closure groups, although minor reductions were found in the circular closure group. These data demonstrate no significant difference between the linear and circular closure techniques with respect to standard echocardiographic parameters, functional classification, and survival.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)841-848
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume103
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Aneurysm
Survival
Left Ventricular Function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Kesler, K., Fiore, A. C., Naunheim, K. S., Sharp, T. G., Mahomed, Y., Zollinger, T. W., ... Barner, H. B. (1992). Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair: A comparison of linear versus circular closure. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 103(5), 841-848.

Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair : A comparison of linear versus circular closure. / Kesler, Kenneth; Fiore, A. C.; Naunheim, K. S.; Sharp, T. G.; Mahomed, Y.; Zollinger, T. W.; Sawada, Stephen; Brown, John; Labovitz, A. J.; Barner, H. B.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 103, No. 5, 1992, p. 841-848.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kesler, K, Fiore, AC, Naunheim, KS, Sharp, TG, Mahomed, Y, Zollinger, TW, Sawada, S, Brown, J, Labovitz, AJ & Barner, HB 1992, 'Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair: A comparison of linear versus circular closure', Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 841-848.
Kesler, Kenneth ; Fiore, A. C. ; Naunheim, K. S. ; Sharp, T. G. ; Mahomed, Y. ; Zollinger, T. W. ; Sawada, Stephen ; Brown, John ; Labovitz, A. J. ; Barner, H. B. / Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair : A comparison of linear versus circular closure. In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1992 ; Vol. 103, No. 5. pp. 841-848.
@article{b0edef0a83754da2afb292c94b10afb2,
title = "Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair: A comparison of linear versus circular closure",
abstract = "To determine the efficacy of ventricular closure techniques, we reviewed our experience with 62 patients who survived the repair of aneurysms of the anterior wall of the left ventricular from 1984 through 1989. Forty of these patients underwent aneurysm repair by standard linear closure and 22 by a circular closure technique. After a mean follow-up interval of 3 years, there were no demonstrable differences in angina class, New York Heart Association functional classification, or survival. In 41 surviving patients, postoperative left ventricular dimensions and function were satisfactorily evaluated by standard echocardiographic measurements. No significant differences were found in postoperative long-axis left ventricular systolic diameter or in short-axis systolic or diastolic areas. There was a significantly larger long-axis diastolic diameter in the circular closure group; however, there was no difference in this parameter when the ratios of postoperative to preoperative lengths were compared. Further intragroup comparisons demonstrated an increase in short-axis areas postoperatively within the circular closure group in contrast to a decrease in patients in the linear closure group; these changes were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in postoperative ejection fraction between the two closure groups, although minor reductions were found in the circular closure group. These data demonstrate no significant difference between the linear and circular closure techniques with respect to standard echocardiographic parameters, functional classification, and survival.",
author = "Kenneth Kesler and Fiore, {A. C.} and Naunheim, {K. S.} and Sharp, {T. G.} and Y. Mahomed and Zollinger, {T. W.} and Stephen Sawada and John Brown and Labovitz, {A. J.} and Barner, {H. B.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "841--848",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair

T2 - A comparison of linear versus circular closure

AU - Kesler, Kenneth

AU - Fiore, A. C.

AU - Naunheim, K. S.

AU - Sharp, T. G.

AU - Mahomed, Y.

AU - Zollinger, T. W.

AU - Sawada, Stephen

AU - Brown, John

AU - Labovitz, A. J.

AU - Barner, H. B.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - To determine the efficacy of ventricular closure techniques, we reviewed our experience with 62 patients who survived the repair of aneurysms of the anterior wall of the left ventricular from 1984 through 1989. Forty of these patients underwent aneurysm repair by standard linear closure and 22 by a circular closure technique. After a mean follow-up interval of 3 years, there were no demonstrable differences in angina class, New York Heart Association functional classification, or survival. In 41 surviving patients, postoperative left ventricular dimensions and function were satisfactorily evaluated by standard echocardiographic measurements. No significant differences were found in postoperative long-axis left ventricular systolic diameter or in short-axis systolic or diastolic areas. There was a significantly larger long-axis diastolic diameter in the circular closure group; however, there was no difference in this parameter when the ratios of postoperative to preoperative lengths were compared. Further intragroup comparisons demonstrated an increase in short-axis areas postoperatively within the circular closure group in contrast to a decrease in patients in the linear closure group; these changes were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in postoperative ejection fraction between the two closure groups, although minor reductions were found in the circular closure group. These data demonstrate no significant difference between the linear and circular closure techniques with respect to standard echocardiographic parameters, functional classification, and survival.

AB - To determine the efficacy of ventricular closure techniques, we reviewed our experience with 62 patients who survived the repair of aneurysms of the anterior wall of the left ventricular from 1984 through 1989. Forty of these patients underwent aneurysm repair by standard linear closure and 22 by a circular closure technique. After a mean follow-up interval of 3 years, there were no demonstrable differences in angina class, New York Heart Association functional classification, or survival. In 41 surviving patients, postoperative left ventricular dimensions and function were satisfactorily evaluated by standard echocardiographic measurements. No significant differences were found in postoperative long-axis left ventricular systolic diameter or in short-axis systolic or diastolic areas. There was a significantly larger long-axis diastolic diameter in the circular closure group; however, there was no difference in this parameter when the ratios of postoperative to preoperative lengths were compared. Further intragroup comparisons demonstrated an increase in short-axis areas postoperatively within the circular closure group in contrast to a decrease in patients in the linear closure group; these changes were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in postoperative ejection fraction between the two closure groups, although minor reductions were found in the circular closure group. These data demonstrate no significant difference between the linear and circular closure techniques with respect to standard echocardiographic parameters, functional classification, and survival.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026642932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026642932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 841

EP - 848

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 5

ER -