Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults?

Benton Hunter, Samuel M. Keim, Rawle A. Seupaul, Gene Hern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The routine use of clinical decision rules and three-view plain radiography to clear the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients has been recently called into question. Clinical Question In low-risk adult blunt trauma patients, can plain radiographs adequately exclude cervical spine injury when clinical prediction rules cannot? Evidence Review Four observational studies investigating the performance of plain radiographs in detecting cervical spine injury in low-risk adult blunt trauma patients were reviewed. Conclusion The consistently poor performance of plain radiographs to rule out cervical spine injury in adult blunt trauma victims is concerning. Large, rigorously performed prospective trials focusing on low- or low/moderate-risk patients will be needed to truly define the utility of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-263
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Spine
Wounds and Injuries
Decision Support Techniques
Radiography
Observational Studies

Keywords

  • cervical spine injury
  • cost-effectiveness
  • medical imaging
  • radiographs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults? / Hunter, Benton; Keim, Samuel M.; Seupaul, Rawle A.; Hern, Gene.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 257-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hunter, Benton ; Keim, Samuel M. ; Seupaul, Rawle A. ; Hern, Gene. / Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults?. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 257-263.
@article{4de40d014072402da34926f4b6c8a524,
title = "Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults?",
abstract = "Background The routine use of clinical decision rules and three-view plain radiography to clear the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients has been recently called into question. Clinical Question In low-risk adult blunt trauma patients, can plain radiographs adequately exclude cervical spine injury when clinical prediction rules cannot? Evidence Review Four observational studies investigating the performance of plain radiographs in detecting cervical spine injury in low-risk adult blunt trauma patients were reviewed. Conclusion The consistently poor performance of plain radiographs to rule out cervical spine injury in adult blunt trauma victims is concerning. Large, rigorously performed prospective trials focusing on low- or low/moderate-risk patients will be needed to truly define the utility of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.",
keywords = "cervical spine injury, cost-effectiveness, medical imaging, radiographs",
author = "Benton Hunter and Keim, {Samuel M.} and Seupaul, {Rawle A.} and Gene Hern",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "257--263",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults?

AU - Hunter, Benton

AU - Keim, Samuel M.

AU - Seupaul, Rawle A.

AU - Hern, Gene

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Background The routine use of clinical decision rules and three-view plain radiography to clear the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients has been recently called into question. Clinical Question In low-risk adult blunt trauma patients, can plain radiographs adequately exclude cervical spine injury when clinical prediction rules cannot? Evidence Review Four observational studies investigating the performance of plain radiographs in detecting cervical spine injury in low-risk adult blunt trauma patients were reviewed. Conclusion The consistently poor performance of plain radiographs to rule out cervical spine injury in adult blunt trauma victims is concerning. Large, rigorously performed prospective trials focusing on low- or low/moderate-risk patients will be needed to truly define the utility of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.

AB - Background The routine use of clinical decision rules and three-view plain radiography to clear the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients has been recently called into question. Clinical Question In low-risk adult blunt trauma patients, can plain radiographs adequately exclude cervical spine injury when clinical prediction rules cannot? Evidence Review Four observational studies investigating the performance of plain radiographs in detecting cervical spine injury in low-risk adult blunt trauma patients were reviewed. Conclusion The consistently poor performance of plain radiographs to rule out cervical spine injury in adult blunt trauma victims is concerning. Large, rigorously performed prospective trials focusing on low- or low/moderate-risk patients will be needed to truly define the utility of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.

KW - cervical spine injury

KW - cost-effectiveness

KW - medical imaging

KW - radiographs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892991622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892991622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.094

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.094

M3 - Article

C2 - 24342907

AN - SCOPUS:84892991622

VL - 46

SP - 257

EP - 263

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 2

ER -