Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing? Views from the field

Carol B. Stocking, Gavin W. Hougham, Aliza R. Baron, Greg Sachs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deliberative bodies have recommended additional protections for persons with dementia included in clinical trials. This survey of experienced dementia researchers revealed that 45 to 64% considered that specific ones of these recommendations would increase subject protection, and 40 to 86% considered they would make research less feasible. The real tradeoff between protection and difficulty in conducting research on devastating illnesses needs to be confronted when new regulations in this area are debated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1649-1651
Number of pages3
JournalNeurology
Volume61
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 23 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dementia
Research
Research Personnel
Clinical Trials
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Stocking, C. B., Hougham, G. W., Baron, A. R., & Sachs, G. (2003). Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing? Views from the field. Neurology, 61(12), 1649-1651.

Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing? Views from the field. / Stocking, Carol B.; Hougham, Gavin W.; Baron, Aliza R.; Sachs, Greg.

In: Neurology, Vol. 61, No. 12, 23.12.2003, p. 1649-1651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stocking, CB, Hougham, GW, Baron, AR & Sachs, G 2003, 'Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing? Views from the field', Neurology, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1649-1651.
Stocking, Carol B. ; Hougham, Gavin W. ; Baron, Aliza R. ; Sachs, Greg. / Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing? Views from the field. In: Neurology. 2003 ; Vol. 61, No. 12. pp. 1649-1651.
@article{b681dd47975f4a18ac13463e4a1c26cb,
title = "Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing? Views from the field",
abstract = "Deliberative bodies have recommended additional protections for persons with dementia included in clinical trials. This survey of experienced dementia researchers revealed that 45 to 64{\%} considered that specific ones of these recommendations would increase subject protection, and 40 to 86{\%} considered they would make research less feasible. The real tradeoff between protection and difficulty in conducting research on devastating illnesses needs to be confronted when new regulations in this area are debated.",
author = "Stocking, {Carol B.} and Hougham, {Gavin W.} and Baron, {Aliza R.} and Greg Sachs",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "23",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1649--1651",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing? Views from the field

AU - Stocking, Carol B.

AU - Hougham, Gavin W.

AU - Baron, Aliza R.

AU - Sachs, Greg

PY - 2003/12/23

Y1 - 2003/12/23

N2 - Deliberative bodies have recommended additional protections for persons with dementia included in clinical trials. This survey of experienced dementia researchers revealed that 45 to 64% considered that specific ones of these recommendations would increase subject protection, and 40 to 86% considered they would make research less feasible. The real tradeoff between protection and difficulty in conducting research on devastating illnesses needs to be confronted when new regulations in this area are debated.

AB - Deliberative bodies have recommended additional protections for persons with dementia included in clinical trials. This survey of experienced dementia researchers revealed that 45 to 64% considered that specific ones of these recommendations would increase subject protection, and 40 to 86% considered they would make research less feasible. The real tradeoff between protection and difficulty in conducting research on devastating illnesses needs to be confronted when new regulations in this area are debated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347951406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347951406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14694024

AN - SCOPUS:0347951406

VL - 61

SP - 1649

EP - 1651

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 12

ER -