Assessing response bias in a web survey at a university faculty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Online surveys are increasingly common due to the myriad of benefits they offer over traditional survey methods. However, research has shown that response rates to web-based surveys are typically lower than to traditional surveys and can possibly yield biased results. University-based faculty members are a unique cohort that may be ideally suited as subjects for web-based surveys. This paper presents the results of a formal assessment of response bias from a large scale anonymous national survey of faculty members in the discipline of health administration. Results suggested that response bias was at levels undetectable using standard methodological approaches. This paper provides the reader with an overview of steps that can assist evaluators in assessing response bias from data collected with surveys. Thus, it will be of interest to researchers utilising electronic survey methods, especially those interested in surveying university-based faculty members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-15
Number of pages11
JournalEvaluation and Research in Education
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

university
trend
online survey
electronics
health

Keywords

  • Faculty survey
  • Non-response methods
  • Response bias
  • Web-based survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Assessing response bias in a web survey at a university faculty. / Menachemi, Nir.

In: Evaluation and Research in Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.03.2011, p. 5-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccc20f87449648adba74f332bed4445c,
title = "Assessing response bias in a web survey at a university faculty",
abstract = "Online surveys are increasingly common due to the myriad of benefits they offer over traditional survey methods. However, research has shown that response rates to web-based surveys are typically lower than to traditional surveys and can possibly yield biased results. University-based faculty members are a unique cohort that may be ideally suited as subjects for web-based surveys. This paper presents the results of a formal assessment of response bias from a large scale anonymous national survey of faculty members in the discipline of health administration. Results suggested that response bias was at levels undetectable using standard methodological approaches. This paper provides the reader with an overview of steps that can assist evaluators in assessing response bias from data collected with surveys. Thus, it will be of interest to researchers utilising electronic survey methods, especially those interested in surveying university-based faculty members.",
keywords = "Faculty survey, Non-response methods, Response bias, Web-based survey",
author = "Nir Menachemi",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09500790.2010.526205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "5--15",
journal = "Evaluation and Research in Education",
issn = "0950-0790",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing response bias in a web survey at a university faculty

AU - Menachemi, Nir

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Online surveys are increasingly common due to the myriad of benefits they offer over traditional survey methods. However, research has shown that response rates to web-based surveys are typically lower than to traditional surveys and can possibly yield biased results. University-based faculty members are a unique cohort that may be ideally suited as subjects for web-based surveys. This paper presents the results of a formal assessment of response bias from a large scale anonymous national survey of faculty members in the discipline of health administration. Results suggested that response bias was at levels undetectable using standard methodological approaches. This paper provides the reader with an overview of steps that can assist evaluators in assessing response bias from data collected with surveys. Thus, it will be of interest to researchers utilising electronic survey methods, especially those interested in surveying university-based faculty members.

AB - Online surveys are increasingly common due to the myriad of benefits they offer over traditional survey methods. However, research has shown that response rates to web-based surveys are typically lower than to traditional surveys and can possibly yield biased results. University-based faculty members are a unique cohort that may be ideally suited as subjects for web-based surveys. This paper presents the results of a formal assessment of response bias from a large scale anonymous national survey of faculty members in the discipline of health administration. Results suggested that response bias was at levels undetectable using standard methodological approaches. This paper provides the reader with an overview of steps that can assist evaluators in assessing response bias from data collected with surveys. Thus, it will be of interest to researchers utilising electronic survey methods, especially those interested in surveying university-based faculty members.

KW - Faculty survey

KW - Non-response methods

KW - Response bias

KW - Web-based survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551511157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551511157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500790.2010.526205

DO - 10.1080/09500790.2010.526205

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79551511157

VL - 24

SP - 5

EP - 15

JO - Evaluation and Research in Education

JF - Evaluation and Research in Education

SN - 0950-0790

IS - 1

ER -