Assessing the Medical Emergency Preparedness of Dental Faculty, Residents, and Practicing Periodontists: An Exploratory Study

Tatiana de Bedout, Kyle Kramer, Steven Blanchard, Yusuke Hamada, George J. Eckert, Gerardo Maupome, Vanchit John

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the increased number of elderly and medically compromised individuals receiving dental care and the presence of systemic comorbidities and associated treatment modalities in this patient population, it is imperative that dentists be prepared to manage a variety of medical emergencies. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of and preparedness to manage common medical emergencies of cohorts of practicing periodontists, specialty residents, and faculty members, both for comparative purposes and as an aid to refining a dental school's standardized case scenarios. The study, conducted in 2017, was designed for four groups of randomly selected participants with at least 20 in each group; the actual number of voluntary participants was 28 private practice periodontists, 22 residents in specialty programs, 21 specialist faculty members, and 24 general practice faculty members. Participants were asked to evaluate ten clinical emergency cases and identify the diagnosis and indicated intervention for each. Groups were also evaluated for differences among correct responses for each case. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences for number of correct diagnoses or interventions among the four groups. However, several cases had varying degrees of incorrect diagnoses and management across all groups. Participants who had recently graduated or were still in school were able to treat cases appropriately more often than the other participants. Further refinement of cases to assess provider preparedness to correctly diagnose and manage medical emergencies is needed, specifically establishing case-specific features and addressing areas of potential confusion before the cases are used for educational purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)492-500
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Dental Education
Volume82
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dental Faculties
Civil Defense
Dentists
Emergencies
resident
Group
Dental Schools
Dental Care
Private Practice
General Practice
dentist
Comorbidity
comorbidity
school
scenario
Population
management

Keywords

  • case-based learning
  • dental education
  • educational methodology
  • medical emergencies
  • medical errors
  • patient safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Assessing the Medical Emergency Preparedness of Dental Faculty, Residents, and Practicing Periodontists : An Exploratory Study. / de Bedout, Tatiana; Kramer, Kyle; Blanchard, Steven; Hamada, Yusuke; Eckert, George J.; Maupome, Gerardo; John, Vanchit.

In: Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 82, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 492-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9f1fa4809a24a8d9df77d26132e478c,
title = "Assessing the Medical Emergency Preparedness of Dental Faculty, Residents, and Practicing Periodontists: An Exploratory Study",
abstract = "With the increased number of elderly and medically compromised individuals receiving dental care and the presence of systemic comorbidities and associated treatment modalities in this patient population, it is imperative that dentists be prepared to manage a variety of medical emergencies. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of and preparedness to manage common medical emergencies of cohorts of practicing periodontists, specialty residents, and faculty members, both for comparative purposes and as an aid to refining a dental school's standardized case scenarios. The study, conducted in 2017, was designed for four groups of randomly selected participants with at least 20 in each group; the actual number of voluntary participants was 28 private practice periodontists, 22 residents in specialty programs, 21 specialist faculty members, and 24 general practice faculty members. Participants were asked to evaluate ten clinical emergency cases and identify the diagnosis and indicated intervention for each. Groups were also evaluated for differences among correct responses for each case. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences for number of correct diagnoses or interventions among the four groups. However, several cases had varying degrees of incorrect diagnoses and management across all groups. Participants who had recently graduated or were still in school were able to treat cases appropriately more often than the other participants. Further refinement of cases to assess provider preparedness to correctly diagnose and manage medical emergencies is needed, specifically establishing case-specific features and addressing areas of potential confusion before the cases are used for educational purposes.",
keywords = "case-based learning, dental education, educational methodology, medical emergencies, medical errors, patient safety",
author = "{de Bedout}, Tatiana and Kyle Kramer and Steven Blanchard and Yusuke Hamada and Eckert, {George J.} and Gerardo Maupome and Vanchit John",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21815/JDE.018.058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "492--500",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the Medical Emergency Preparedness of Dental Faculty, Residents, and Practicing Periodontists

T2 - An Exploratory Study

AU - de Bedout, Tatiana

AU - Kramer, Kyle

AU - Blanchard, Steven

AU - Hamada, Yusuke

AU - Eckert, George J.

AU - Maupome, Gerardo

AU - John, Vanchit

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - With the increased number of elderly and medically compromised individuals receiving dental care and the presence of systemic comorbidities and associated treatment modalities in this patient population, it is imperative that dentists be prepared to manage a variety of medical emergencies. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of and preparedness to manage common medical emergencies of cohorts of practicing periodontists, specialty residents, and faculty members, both for comparative purposes and as an aid to refining a dental school's standardized case scenarios. The study, conducted in 2017, was designed for four groups of randomly selected participants with at least 20 in each group; the actual number of voluntary participants was 28 private practice periodontists, 22 residents in specialty programs, 21 specialist faculty members, and 24 general practice faculty members. Participants were asked to evaluate ten clinical emergency cases and identify the diagnosis and indicated intervention for each. Groups were also evaluated for differences among correct responses for each case. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences for number of correct diagnoses or interventions among the four groups. However, several cases had varying degrees of incorrect diagnoses and management across all groups. Participants who had recently graduated or were still in school were able to treat cases appropriately more often than the other participants. Further refinement of cases to assess provider preparedness to correctly diagnose and manage medical emergencies is needed, specifically establishing case-specific features and addressing areas of potential confusion before the cases are used for educational purposes.

AB - With the increased number of elderly and medically compromised individuals receiving dental care and the presence of systemic comorbidities and associated treatment modalities in this patient population, it is imperative that dentists be prepared to manage a variety of medical emergencies. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of and preparedness to manage common medical emergencies of cohorts of practicing periodontists, specialty residents, and faculty members, both for comparative purposes and as an aid to refining a dental school's standardized case scenarios. The study, conducted in 2017, was designed for four groups of randomly selected participants with at least 20 in each group; the actual number of voluntary participants was 28 private practice periodontists, 22 residents in specialty programs, 21 specialist faculty members, and 24 general practice faculty members. Participants were asked to evaluate ten clinical emergency cases and identify the diagnosis and indicated intervention for each. Groups were also evaluated for differences among correct responses for each case. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences for number of correct diagnoses or interventions among the four groups. However, several cases had varying degrees of incorrect diagnoses and management across all groups. Participants who had recently graduated or were still in school were able to treat cases appropriately more often than the other participants. Further refinement of cases to assess provider preparedness to correctly diagnose and manage medical emergencies is needed, specifically establishing case-specific features and addressing areas of potential confusion before the cases are used for educational purposes.

KW - case-based learning

KW - dental education

KW - educational methodology

KW - medical emergencies

KW - medical errors

KW - patient safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046574115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046574115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21815/JDE.018.058

DO - 10.21815/JDE.018.058

M3 - Article

C2 - 29717073

AN - SCOPUS:85046574115

VL - 82

SP - 492

EP - 500

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 5

ER -