Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced cancer

The accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance of spiritual well-being - A hoosier oncology group study

Michael J. Fisch, Michael L. Titzer, Jean L. Kristeller, Jianzhao Shen, Patrick Loehrer, Sin Ho Jung, Steven D. Passik, Lawrence Einhorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the association between quality-of-life (QOL) impairment as reported by patients and QOL impairment as judged by nurses or physicians, with and without consideration of spiritual well-being (SWB). Patients and Methods: A total of 163 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto a therapeutic trial, and cross-sectional data were derived from clinical and demographic questionnaires obtained at baseline, including assessment of patient QOL and SWB. Clinicians rated the QOL impairment of their patients as mild, moderate, or severe. Clinician-estimated QOL impairment and patient-derived QOL categories were compared. Correlation coefficients were estimated to associate QOL scores using different instruments. The analysis of variance method was used to compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores on categorical variables. Results: There was no significant association between self-assessment scores and marital status, education level. performance status, or predicted life expectancy. However, a strong relationship between SWB and QOL was noted (P < .0001). Clinician-estimated QOL impairment matched the level of patient-derived QOL correctly in approximately 60% of cases, with only slight variation depending on the method of categorizing patient-derived QOL scores. The accuracy of clinician estimates was not associated with the level of SWB. Interestingly, a subset analysis of the inaccurate estimates revealed an association between lower SWB and clinician underestimation of QOL impairment (P = .0025). Conclusion: Clinician estimates of QOL impairment were accurate in more than 60% of patients. SWB is strongly associated with QOL, but it is not associated with the overall accuracy of clinicians' judgments about QOL impairment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2754-2759
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume21
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2003

Fingerprint

Outpatients
Quality of Life
Neoplasms
Marital Status
Life Expectancy
Analysis of Variance
Nurses
Demography
Physicians
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced cancer : The accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance of spiritual well-being - A hoosier oncology group study. / Fisch, Michael J.; Titzer, Michael L.; Kristeller, Jean L.; Shen, Jianzhao; Loehrer, Patrick; Jung, Sin Ho; Passik, Steven D.; Einhorn, Lawrence.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 21, No. 14, 15.07.2003, p. 2754-2759.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e6c44638cfc4f0480cceca4f72e228b,
title = "Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced cancer: The accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance of spiritual well-being - A hoosier oncology group study",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the association between quality-of-life (QOL) impairment as reported by patients and QOL impairment as judged by nurses or physicians, with and without consideration of spiritual well-being (SWB). Patients and Methods: A total of 163 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto a therapeutic trial, and cross-sectional data were derived from clinical and demographic questionnaires obtained at baseline, including assessment of patient QOL and SWB. Clinicians rated the QOL impairment of their patients as mild, moderate, or severe. Clinician-estimated QOL impairment and patient-derived QOL categories were compared. Correlation coefficients were estimated to associate QOL scores using different instruments. The analysis of variance method was used to compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores on categorical variables. Results: There was no significant association between self-assessment scores and marital status, education level. performance status, or predicted life expectancy. However, a strong relationship between SWB and QOL was noted (P < .0001). Clinician-estimated QOL impairment matched the level of patient-derived QOL correctly in approximately 60{\%} of cases, with only slight variation depending on the method of categorizing patient-derived QOL scores. The accuracy of clinician estimates was not associated with the level of SWB. Interestingly, a subset analysis of the inaccurate estimates revealed an association between lower SWB and clinician underestimation of QOL impairment (P = .0025). Conclusion: Clinician estimates of QOL impairment were accurate in more than 60{\%} of patients. SWB is strongly associated with QOL, but it is not associated with the overall accuracy of clinicians' judgments about QOL impairment.",
author = "Fisch, {Michael J.} and Titzer, {Michael L.} and Kristeller, {Jean L.} and Jianzhao Shen and Patrick Loehrer and Jung, {Sin Ho} and Passik, {Steven D.} and Lawrence Einhorn",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2003.06.093",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "2754--2759",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced cancer

T2 - The accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance of spiritual well-being - A hoosier oncology group study

AU - Fisch, Michael J.

AU - Titzer, Michael L.

AU - Kristeller, Jean L.

AU - Shen, Jianzhao

AU - Loehrer, Patrick

AU - Jung, Sin Ho

AU - Passik, Steven D.

AU - Einhorn, Lawrence

PY - 2003/7/15

Y1 - 2003/7/15

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the association between quality-of-life (QOL) impairment as reported by patients and QOL impairment as judged by nurses or physicians, with and without consideration of spiritual well-being (SWB). Patients and Methods: A total of 163 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto a therapeutic trial, and cross-sectional data were derived from clinical and demographic questionnaires obtained at baseline, including assessment of patient QOL and SWB. Clinicians rated the QOL impairment of their patients as mild, moderate, or severe. Clinician-estimated QOL impairment and patient-derived QOL categories were compared. Correlation coefficients were estimated to associate QOL scores using different instruments. The analysis of variance method was used to compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores on categorical variables. Results: There was no significant association between self-assessment scores and marital status, education level. performance status, or predicted life expectancy. However, a strong relationship between SWB and QOL was noted (P < .0001). Clinician-estimated QOL impairment matched the level of patient-derived QOL correctly in approximately 60% of cases, with only slight variation depending on the method of categorizing patient-derived QOL scores. The accuracy of clinician estimates was not associated with the level of SWB. Interestingly, a subset analysis of the inaccurate estimates revealed an association between lower SWB and clinician underestimation of QOL impairment (P = .0025). Conclusion: Clinician estimates of QOL impairment were accurate in more than 60% of patients. SWB is strongly associated with QOL, but it is not associated with the overall accuracy of clinicians' judgments about QOL impairment.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the association between quality-of-life (QOL) impairment as reported by patients and QOL impairment as judged by nurses or physicians, with and without consideration of spiritual well-being (SWB). Patients and Methods: A total of 163 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto a therapeutic trial, and cross-sectional data were derived from clinical and demographic questionnaires obtained at baseline, including assessment of patient QOL and SWB. Clinicians rated the QOL impairment of their patients as mild, moderate, or severe. Clinician-estimated QOL impairment and patient-derived QOL categories were compared. Correlation coefficients were estimated to associate QOL scores using different instruments. The analysis of variance method was used to compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores on categorical variables. Results: There was no significant association between self-assessment scores and marital status, education level. performance status, or predicted life expectancy. However, a strong relationship between SWB and QOL was noted (P < .0001). Clinician-estimated QOL impairment matched the level of patient-derived QOL correctly in approximately 60% of cases, with only slight variation depending on the method of categorizing patient-derived QOL scores. The accuracy of clinician estimates was not associated with the level of SWB. Interestingly, a subset analysis of the inaccurate estimates revealed an association between lower SWB and clinician underestimation of QOL impairment (P = .0025). Conclusion: Clinician estimates of QOL impairment were accurate in more than 60% of patients. SWB is strongly associated with QOL, but it is not associated with the overall accuracy of clinicians' judgments about QOL impairment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042631358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042631358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.093

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.093

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 2754

EP - 2759

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 14

ER -