Attitudes and Experiences of Early and Midcareer Pediatricians With the Maintenance of Certification Process

Bobbi Byrne, Mary Pat Frintner, Heather N. Abraham, Amy J. Starmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Maintenance of certification (MOC) value and relevance have been recent topics of controversy and discussion in medicine. Systematically assessing pediatrician's attitudes and experiences to encourage and inform future modifications is important. Methods: We surveyed 866 pediatricians in 2014 who graduated from residency 10 to 12 years ago and are part of a larger longitudinal study. Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative data on understanding, attitudes, barriers, and needs specific to MOC part 2 (self-assessment/continued learning activities) and part 4 (quality improvement projects) were analyzed. McNemar tests compared responses on questions specific to part 2 with those specific to part 4. Multivariable logistic regression considered differences in participants who did and did not have positive part 4 attitudes. Results: A total of 77.8% completed the survey. Comparing part 4 to part 2, there was less understanding of requirements (59.9%, 72.9%, P < .001), more agreement that relevant available activities is a barrier (67.6%, 44.0%, P < .001), stronger agreement that more choices would be helpful (72.8%, 53.8%, P < .001), and less perceived impact on patient care or lifelong learning (12.5%, 47.2%, P < .001). Participants reporting that part 4 improves care were less likely to agree that time to fulfill requirements (adjusted odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.51) and relevant available activities (adjusted odds ratio = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.39) were barriers. Qualitative analysis revealed themes including time, cost, and relevance. Conclusions: Pediatricians expressed significant frustration with the MOC process, poor understanding of requirements, and barriers with the process, especially for part 4. Increasing diplomate education on the process and increasing available and relevant activities may be important to optimize physician's continuous learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 26 2016

Fingerprint

Certification
Maintenance
Learning
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Frustration
Internship and Residency
Quality Improvement
Longitudinal Studies
Patient Care
Logistic Models
Medicine
Physicians
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pediatricians

Keywords

  • American Board of Pediatrics
  • Early career pediatrician
  • Maintenance of certification
  • Midcareer pediatrician

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Attitudes and Experiences of Early and Midcareer Pediatricians With the Maintenance of Certification Process. / Byrne, Bobbi; Frintner, Mary Pat; Abraham, Heather N.; Starmer, Amy J.

In: Academic Pediatrics, 26.07.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b71522da6dd04f1994ba5279f44ecb7c,
title = "Attitudes and Experiences of Early and Midcareer Pediatricians With the Maintenance of Certification Process",
abstract = "Objective: Maintenance of certification (MOC) value and relevance have been recent topics of controversy and discussion in medicine. Systematically assessing pediatrician's attitudes and experiences to encourage and inform future modifications is important. Methods: We surveyed 866 pediatricians in 2014 who graduated from residency 10 to 12 years ago and are part of a larger longitudinal study. Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative data on understanding, attitudes, barriers, and needs specific to MOC part 2 (self-assessment/continued learning activities) and part 4 (quality improvement projects) were analyzed. McNemar tests compared responses on questions specific to part 2 with those specific to part 4. Multivariable logistic regression considered differences in participants who did and did not have positive part 4 attitudes. Results: A total of 77.8{\%} completed the survey. Comparing part 4 to part 2, there was less understanding of requirements (59.9{\%}, 72.9{\%}, P < .001), more agreement that relevant available activities is a barrier (67.6{\%}, 44.0{\%}, P < .001), stronger agreement that more choices would be helpful (72.8{\%}, 53.8{\%}, P < .001), and less perceived impact on patient care or lifelong learning (12.5{\%}, 47.2{\%}, P < .001). Participants reporting that part 4 improves care were less likely to agree that time to fulfill requirements (adjusted odds ratio = 0.30, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.18-0.51) and relevant available activities (adjusted odds ratio = 0.22, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.13-0.39) were barriers. Qualitative analysis revealed themes including time, cost, and relevance. Conclusions: Pediatricians expressed significant frustration with the MOC process, poor understanding of requirements, and barriers with the process, especially for part 4. Increasing diplomate education on the process and increasing available and relevant activities may be important to optimize physician's continuous learning.",
keywords = "American Board of Pediatrics, Early career pediatrician, Maintenance of certification, Midcareer pediatrician",
author = "Bobbi Byrne and Frintner, {Mary Pat} and Abraham, {Heather N.} and Starmer, {Amy J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1016/j.acap.2016.10.019",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes and Experiences of Early and Midcareer Pediatricians With the Maintenance of Certification Process

AU - Byrne, Bobbi

AU - Frintner, Mary Pat

AU - Abraham, Heather N.

AU - Starmer, Amy J.

PY - 2016/7/26

Y1 - 2016/7/26

N2 - Objective: Maintenance of certification (MOC) value and relevance have been recent topics of controversy and discussion in medicine. Systematically assessing pediatrician's attitudes and experiences to encourage and inform future modifications is important. Methods: We surveyed 866 pediatricians in 2014 who graduated from residency 10 to 12 years ago and are part of a larger longitudinal study. Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative data on understanding, attitudes, barriers, and needs specific to MOC part 2 (self-assessment/continued learning activities) and part 4 (quality improvement projects) were analyzed. McNemar tests compared responses on questions specific to part 2 with those specific to part 4. Multivariable logistic regression considered differences in participants who did and did not have positive part 4 attitudes. Results: A total of 77.8% completed the survey. Comparing part 4 to part 2, there was less understanding of requirements (59.9%, 72.9%, P < .001), more agreement that relevant available activities is a barrier (67.6%, 44.0%, P < .001), stronger agreement that more choices would be helpful (72.8%, 53.8%, P < .001), and less perceived impact on patient care or lifelong learning (12.5%, 47.2%, P < .001). Participants reporting that part 4 improves care were less likely to agree that time to fulfill requirements (adjusted odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.51) and relevant available activities (adjusted odds ratio = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.39) were barriers. Qualitative analysis revealed themes including time, cost, and relevance. Conclusions: Pediatricians expressed significant frustration with the MOC process, poor understanding of requirements, and barriers with the process, especially for part 4. Increasing diplomate education on the process and increasing available and relevant activities may be important to optimize physician's continuous learning.

AB - Objective: Maintenance of certification (MOC) value and relevance have been recent topics of controversy and discussion in medicine. Systematically assessing pediatrician's attitudes and experiences to encourage and inform future modifications is important. Methods: We surveyed 866 pediatricians in 2014 who graduated from residency 10 to 12 years ago and are part of a larger longitudinal study. Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative data on understanding, attitudes, barriers, and needs specific to MOC part 2 (self-assessment/continued learning activities) and part 4 (quality improvement projects) were analyzed. McNemar tests compared responses on questions specific to part 2 with those specific to part 4. Multivariable logistic regression considered differences in participants who did and did not have positive part 4 attitudes. Results: A total of 77.8% completed the survey. Comparing part 4 to part 2, there was less understanding of requirements (59.9%, 72.9%, P < .001), more agreement that relevant available activities is a barrier (67.6%, 44.0%, P < .001), stronger agreement that more choices would be helpful (72.8%, 53.8%, P < .001), and less perceived impact on patient care or lifelong learning (12.5%, 47.2%, P < .001). Participants reporting that part 4 improves care were less likely to agree that time to fulfill requirements (adjusted odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.51) and relevant available activities (adjusted odds ratio = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.39) were barriers. Qualitative analysis revealed themes including time, cost, and relevance. Conclusions: Pediatricians expressed significant frustration with the MOC process, poor understanding of requirements, and barriers with the process, especially for part 4. Increasing diplomate education on the process and increasing available and relevant activities may be important to optimize physician's continuous learning.

KW - American Board of Pediatrics

KW - Early career pediatrician

KW - Maintenance of certification

KW - Midcareer pediatrician

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013645671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013645671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2016.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2016.10.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 28238591

AN - SCOPUS:85013645671

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

ER -