Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Interobserver and intraobserver variability

Rohit K. Jain, Rutika Mehta, Rosen Dimitrov, Lisbeth G. Larsson, Paul M. Musto, Kurt B. Hodges, Thomas Ulbright, Eyas M. Hattab, Narasimhan Agaram, Muhammad Idrees, Sunil Badve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of benign intraductal proliferative lesions has been poor. The aims of the study were to investigate the inter- and intraobserver variability and the impact of the addition of an immunostain for high- and low-molecular weight keratins on the variability. Nine pathologists reviewed 81 cases of breast proliferative lesions in three stages and assigned each of the lesions to one of the following three diagnoses: usual ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Hematoxylin and eosin slides and corresponding slides stained with ADH-5 cocktail (cytokeratins (CK) 5, 14. 7, 18 and p63) by immunohistochemistry were evaluated. Concordance was evaluated at each stage of the study. The interobserver agreement among the nine pathologists for diagnosing the 81 proliferative breast lesions was fair (κ-value=0.34). The intraobserver-value ranged from 0.56 to 0.88 (moderate to strong). Complete agreement among nine pathologists was achieved in only nine (11%) cases, at least eight agreed in 20 (25%) cases and seven or more agreed in 38 (47%) cases. Following immunohistochemical stain, a significant improvement in the interobserver concordance (overall-value=0.50) was observed (P=0.015). There was a significant reduction in the total number of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis made by nine pathologists after the use of ADH-5 immunostain. Atypical ductal hyperplasia still remains a diagnostic dilemma with wide variation in both inter- and intraobserver reproducibility among pathologists. The addition of an immunohistochemical stain led to a significant improvement in the concordance rate. More importantly, there was an 8% decrease in the number of lesions classified as atypical ductal hyperplasia in favor of usual hyperplasia; in clinical practice, this could lead to a decrease in the number of surgeries carried out for intraductal proliferative lesions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)917-923
Number of pages7
JournalModern Pathology
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Observer Variation
Breast
Coloring Agents
Keratin-14
Keratin-5
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Keratins
Hyperplasia
Molecular Weight
Immunohistochemistry
Pathologists

Keywords

  • atypical ductal hyperplasia
  • ductal carcinoma in situ
  • immunohistochemistry
  • interobserver variation
  • usual ductal hyperplasia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Jain, R. K., Mehta, R., Dimitrov, R., Larsson, L. G., Musto, P. M., Hodges, K. B., ... Badve, S. (2011). Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Interobserver and intraobserver variability. Modern Pathology, 24(7), 917-923. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.66

Atypical ductal hyperplasia : Interobserver and intraobserver variability. / Jain, Rohit K.; Mehta, Rutika; Dimitrov, Rosen; Larsson, Lisbeth G.; Musto, Paul M.; Hodges, Kurt B.; Ulbright, Thomas; Hattab, Eyas M.; Agaram, Narasimhan; Idrees, Muhammad; Badve, Sunil.

In: Modern Pathology, Vol. 24, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 917-923.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jain, RK, Mehta, R, Dimitrov, R, Larsson, LG, Musto, PM, Hodges, KB, Ulbright, T, Hattab, EM, Agaram, N, Idrees, M & Badve, S 2011, 'Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Interobserver and intraobserver variability', Modern Pathology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 917-923. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.66
Jain RK, Mehta R, Dimitrov R, Larsson LG, Musto PM, Hodges KB et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Interobserver and intraobserver variability. Modern Pathology. 2011 Jul;24(7):917-923. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.66
Jain, Rohit K. ; Mehta, Rutika ; Dimitrov, Rosen ; Larsson, Lisbeth G. ; Musto, Paul M. ; Hodges, Kurt B. ; Ulbright, Thomas ; Hattab, Eyas M. ; Agaram, Narasimhan ; Idrees, Muhammad ; Badve, Sunil. / Atypical ductal hyperplasia : Interobserver and intraobserver variability. In: Modern Pathology. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 917-923.
@article{1e2c8400909c45e8bdb80e6862ede65c,
title = "Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Interobserver and intraobserver variability",
abstract = "Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of benign intraductal proliferative lesions has been poor. The aims of the study were to investigate the inter- and intraobserver variability and the impact of the addition of an immunostain for high- and low-molecular weight keratins on the variability. Nine pathologists reviewed 81 cases of breast proliferative lesions in three stages and assigned each of the lesions to one of the following three diagnoses: usual ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Hematoxylin and eosin slides and corresponding slides stained with ADH-5 cocktail (cytokeratins (CK) 5, 14. 7, 18 and p63) by immunohistochemistry were evaluated. Concordance was evaluated at each stage of the study. The interobserver agreement among the nine pathologists for diagnosing the 81 proliferative breast lesions was fair (κ-value=0.34). The intraobserver-value ranged from 0.56 to 0.88 (moderate to strong). Complete agreement among nine pathologists was achieved in only nine (11{\%}) cases, at least eight agreed in 20 (25{\%}) cases and seven or more agreed in 38 (47{\%}) cases. Following immunohistochemical stain, a significant improvement in the interobserver concordance (overall-value=0.50) was observed (P=0.015). There was a significant reduction in the total number of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis made by nine pathologists after the use of ADH-5 immunostain. Atypical ductal hyperplasia still remains a diagnostic dilemma with wide variation in both inter- and intraobserver reproducibility among pathologists. The addition of an immunohistochemical stain led to a significant improvement in the concordance rate. More importantly, there was an 8{\%} decrease in the number of lesions classified as atypical ductal hyperplasia in favor of usual hyperplasia; in clinical practice, this could lead to a decrease in the number of surgeries carried out for intraductal proliferative lesions.",
keywords = "atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, immunohistochemistry, interobserver variation, usual ductal hyperplasia",
author = "Jain, {Rohit K.} and Rutika Mehta and Rosen Dimitrov and Larsson, {Lisbeth G.} and Musto, {Paul M.} and Hodges, {Kurt B.} and Thomas Ulbright and Hattab, {Eyas M.} and Narasimhan Agaram and Muhammad Idrees and Sunil Badve",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1038/modpathol.2011.66",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "917--923",
journal = "Modern Pathology",
issn = "0893-3952",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Atypical ductal hyperplasia

T2 - Interobserver and intraobserver variability

AU - Jain, Rohit K.

AU - Mehta, Rutika

AU - Dimitrov, Rosen

AU - Larsson, Lisbeth G.

AU - Musto, Paul M.

AU - Hodges, Kurt B.

AU - Ulbright, Thomas

AU - Hattab, Eyas M.

AU - Agaram, Narasimhan

AU - Idrees, Muhammad

AU - Badve, Sunil

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of benign intraductal proliferative lesions has been poor. The aims of the study were to investigate the inter- and intraobserver variability and the impact of the addition of an immunostain for high- and low-molecular weight keratins on the variability. Nine pathologists reviewed 81 cases of breast proliferative lesions in three stages and assigned each of the lesions to one of the following three diagnoses: usual ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Hematoxylin and eosin slides and corresponding slides stained with ADH-5 cocktail (cytokeratins (CK) 5, 14. 7, 18 and p63) by immunohistochemistry were evaluated. Concordance was evaluated at each stage of the study. The interobserver agreement among the nine pathologists for diagnosing the 81 proliferative breast lesions was fair (κ-value=0.34). The intraobserver-value ranged from 0.56 to 0.88 (moderate to strong). Complete agreement among nine pathologists was achieved in only nine (11%) cases, at least eight agreed in 20 (25%) cases and seven or more agreed in 38 (47%) cases. Following immunohistochemical stain, a significant improvement in the interobserver concordance (overall-value=0.50) was observed (P=0.015). There was a significant reduction in the total number of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis made by nine pathologists after the use of ADH-5 immunostain. Atypical ductal hyperplasia still remains a diagnostic dilemma with wide variation in both inter- and intraobserver reproducibility among pathologists. The addition of an immunohistochemical stain led to a significant improvement in the concordance rate. More importantly, there was an 8% decrease in the number of lesions classified as atypical ductal hyperplasia in favor of usual hyperplasia; in clinical practice, this could lead to a decrease in the number of surgeries carried out for intraductal proliferative lesions.

AB - Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of benign intraductal proliferative lesions has been poor. The aims of the study were to investigate the inter- and intraobserver variability and the impact of the addition of an immunostain for high- and low-molecular weight keratins on the variability. Nine pathologists reviewed 81 cases of breast proliferative lesions in three stages and assigned each of the lesions to one of the following three diagnoses: usual ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Hematoxylin and eosin slides and corresponding slides stained with ADH-5 cocktail (cytokeratins (CK) 5, 14. 7, 18 and p63) by immunohistochemistry were evaluated. Concordance was evaluated at each stage of the study. The interobserver agreement among the nine pathologists for diagnosing the 81 proliferative breast lesions was fair (κ-value=0.34). The intraobserver-value ranged from 0.56 to 0.88 (moderate to strong). Complete agreement among nine pathologists was achieved in only nine (11%) cases, at least eight agreed in 20 (25%) cases and seven or more agreed in 38 (47%) cases. Following immunohistochemical stain, a significant improvement in the interobserver concordance (overall-value=0.50) was observed (P=0.015). There was a significant reduction in the total number of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis made by nine pathologists after the use of ADH-5 immunostain. Atypical ductal hyperplasia still remains a diagnostic dilemma with wide variation in both inter- and intraobserver reproducibility among pathologists. The addition of an immunohistochemical stain led to a significant improvement in the concordance rate. More importantly, there was an 8% decrease in the number of lesions classified as atypical ductal hyperplasia in favor of usual hyperplasia; in clinical practice, this could lead to a decrease in the number of surgeries carried out for intraductal proliferative lesions.

KW - atypical ductal hyperplasia

KW - ductal carcinoma in situ

KW - immunohistochemistry

KW - interobserver variation

KW - usual ductal hyperplasia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959937342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959937342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/modpathol.2011.66

DO - 10.1038/modpathol.2011.66

M3 - Article

C2 - 21532546

AN - SCOPUS:79959937342

VL - 24

SP - 917

EP - 923

JO - Modern Pathology

JF - Modern Pathology

SN - 0893-3952

IS - 7

ER -