Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers

Linda Forst, Isabel Martinez Noth, Steven Lacey, Susan Bauer, Sara Skinner, Robert Petrea, Joseph P. Zanoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Agricultural work is one of the riskiest occupations for the eyes. Protective eyewear can prevent eye injuries in upward of 90% of cases. Latino migrant and seasonal farm workers (LFWs) are at particular risk of eye injury because of economic, social, and cultural barriers to safe employment. The goal of this project was to determine the perceived benefits and barriers to use of protective eyewear during agricultural work among LFWs. In the year 2000, 55 workers who spent at least part of their time working in Illinois and Michigan as seasonal, hired farm workers were interviewed either individually (9) or in six focus groups (46) regarding their perceptions of eye hazards and the factors that encourage or discourage the use of protective eyewear. Subsequently, safety glasses and training on eye safety were delivered by promotores de salud to LFWs from the same cohort over two summer seasons. During the second season, the promotores observed the use of safety eyewear by farm workers at least once per week on 17 farms over a three-month period. At each point of observation, the promotores asked those wearing the glasses why they chose to wear them and those who were not wearing them, why not. At both points of the study (pre-intervention interviews and post-intervention observations), the reasons for use fell into the following categories: protection from hazards, appearance, whether it was mandated/provided by the employer, and whether others used it. The reasons for non-use include perceived lack of protection, discomfort, undesirable appearance, interference with visual acuity, slowing down the work pace, and no mandate from employers. Since eliminating the eye injury hazard is not possible in most agricultural settings, administrative strategies and use of personal protective equipment are critical. Perceptions of the target audience, LFWs, should be used to develop a comprehensive eye safety program; this should include allowing LFWs to select a style from effective prototypes, providing eyewear and promoting/mandating its use in hazardous job tasks, and implementing a comprehensive PPE program for eye safety. In addition, addressing functional problems-falling off, fogging, loss and forgetting glasses, the pace slowdown that reduces production and leads to lower wages for workers-should be addressed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-17
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Agromedicine
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 27 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hispanic Americans
Eye Injuries
Safety
Glass
Accidental Falls
Eye Protective Devices
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Farmers
Focus Groups
Occupations
Visual Acuity
Economics
Observation
Interviews

Keywords

  • Agricultural eye injuries
  • Eye injuries
  • Hispanic workers
  • Immigrant health
  • Migrant farm workers
  • Ocular hazards
  • Safety eyewear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Forst, L., Martinez Noth, I., Lacey, S., Bauer, S., Skinner, S., Petrea, R., & Zanoni, J. P. (2006). Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers. Journal of Agromedicine, 11(2), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J096v11n02_04

Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers. / Forst, Linda; Martinez Noth, Isabel; Lacey, Steven; Bauer, Susan; Skinner, Sara; Petrea, Robert; Zanoni, Joseph P.

In: Journal of Agromedicine, Vol. 11, No. 2, 27.11.2006, p. 11-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Forst, L, Martinez Noth, I, Lacey, S, Bauer, S, Skinner, S, Petrea, R & Zanoni, JP 2006, 'Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers', Journal of Agromedicine, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J096v11n02_04
Forst, Linda ; Martinez Noth, Isabel ; Lacey, Steven ; Bauer, Susan ; Skinner, Sara ; Petrea, Robert ; Zanoni, Joseph P. / Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers. In: Journal of Agromedicine. 2006 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 11-17.
@article{5723213d83774e998fb5bc19c3b8ad62,
title = "Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers",
abstract = "Agricultural work is one of the riskiest occupations for the eyes. Protective eyewear can prevent eye injuries in upward of 90{\%} of cases. Latino migrant and seasonal farm workers (LFWs) are at particular risk of eye injury because of economic, social, and cultural barriers to safe employment. The goal of this project was to determine the perceived benefits and barriers to use of protective eyewear during agricultural work among LFWs. In the year 2000, 55 workers who spent at least part of their time working in Illinois and Michigan as seasonal, hired farm workers were interviewed either individually (9) or in six focus groups (46) regarding their perceptions of eye hazards and the factors that encourage or discourage the use of protective eyewear. Subsequently, safety glasses and training on eye safety were delivered by promotores de salud to LFWs from the same cohort over two summer seasons. During the second season, the promotores observed the use of safety eyewear by farm workers at least once per week on 17 farms over a three-month period. At each point of observation, the promotores asked those wearing the glasses why they chose to wear them and those who were not wearing them, why not. At both points of the study (pre-intervention interviews and post-intervention observations), the reasons for use fell into the following categories: protection from hazards, appearance, whether it was mandated/provided by the employer, and whether others used it. The reasons for non-use include perceived lack of protection, discomfort, undesirable appearance, interference with visual acuity, slowing down the work pace, and no mandate from employers. Since eliminating the eye injury hazard is not possible in most agricultural settings, administrative strategies and use of personal protective equipment are critical. Perceptions of the target audience, LFWs, should be used to develop a comprehensive eye safety program; this should include allowing LFWs to select a style from effective prototypes, providing eyewear and promoting/mandating its use in hazardous job tasks, and implementing a comprehensive PPE program for eye safety. In addition, addressing functional problems-falling off, fogging, loss and forgetting glasses, the pace slowdown that reduces production and leads to lower wages for workers-should be addressed.",
keywords = "Agricultural eye injuries, Eye injuries, Hispanic workers, Immigrant health, Migrant farm workers, Ocular hazards, Safety eyewear",
author = "Linda Forst and {Martinez Noth}, Isabel and Steven Lacey and Susan Bauer and Sara Skinner and Robert Petrea and Zanoni, {Joseph P.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1300/J096v11n02_04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "11--17",
journal = "Journal of Agromedicine",
issn = "1059-924X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers

AU - Forst, Linda

AU - Martinez Noth, Isabel

AU - Lacey, Steven

AU - Bauer, Susan

AU - Skinner, Sara

AU - Petrea, Robert

AU - Zanoni, Joseph P.

PY - 2006/11/27

Y1 - 2006/11/27

N2 - Agricultural work is one of the riskiest occupations for the eyes. Protective eyewear can prevent eye injuries in upward of 90% of cases. Latino migrant and seasonal farm workers (LFWs) are at particular risk of eye injury because of economic, social, and cultural barriers to safe employment. The goal of this project was to determine the perceived benefits and barriers to use of protective eyewear during agricultural work among LFWs. In the year 2000, 55 workers who spent at least part of their time working in Illinois and Michigan as seasonal, hired farm workers were interviewed either individually (9) or in six focus groups (46) regarding their perceptions of eye hazards and the factors that encourage or discourage the use of protective eyewear. Subsequently, safety glasses and training on eye safety were delivered by promotores de salud to LFWs from the same cohort over two summer seasons. During the second season, the promotores observed the use of safety eyewear by farm workers at least once per week on 17 farms over a three-month period. At each point of observation, the promotores asked those wearing the glasses why they chose to wear them and those who were not wearing them, why not. At both points of the study (pre-intervention interviews and post-intervention observations), the reasons for use fell into the following categories: protection from hazards, appearance, whether it was mandated/provided by the employer, and whether others used it. The reasons for non-use include perceived lack of protection, discomfort, undesirable appearance, interference with visual acuity, slowing down the work pace, and no mandate from employers. Since eliminating the eye injury hazard is not possible in most agricultural settings, administrative strategies and use of personal protective equipment are critical. Perceptions of the target audience, LFWs, should be used to develop a comprehensive eye safety program; this should include allowing LFWs to select a style from effective prototypes, providing eyewear and promoting/mandating its use in hazardous job tasks, and implementing a comprehensive PPE program for eye safety. In addition, addressing functional problems-falling off, fogging, loss and forgetting glasses, the pace slowdown that reduces production and leads to lower wages for workers-should be addressed.

AB - Agricultural work is one of the riskiest occupations for the eyes. Protective eyewear can prevent eye injuries in upward of 90% of cases. Latino migrant and seasonal farm workers (LFWs) are at particular risk of eye injury because of economic, social, and cultural barriers to safe employment. The goal of this project was to determine the perceived benefits and barriers to use of protective eyewear during agricultural work among LFWs. In the year 2000, 55 workers who spent at least part of their time working in Illinois and Michigan as seasonal, hired farm workers were interviewed either individually (9) or in six focus groups (46) regarding their perceptions of eye hazards and the factors that encourage or discourage the use of protective eyewear. Subsequently, safety glasses and training on eye safety were delivered by promotores de salud to LFWs from the same cohort over two summer seasons. During the second season, the promotores observed the use of safety eyewear by farm workers at least once per week on 17 farms over a three-month period. At each point of observation, the promotores asked those wearing the glasses why they chose to wear them and those who were not wearing them, why not. At both points of the study (pre-intervention interviews and post-intervention observations), the reasons for use fell into the following categories: protection from hazards, appearance, whether it was mandated/provided by the employer, and whether others used it. The reasons for non-use include perceived lack of protection, discomfort, undesirable appearance, interference with visual acuity, slowing down the work pace, and no mandate from employers. Since eliminating the eye injury hazard is not possible in most agricultural settings, administrative strategies and use of personal protective equipment are critical. Perceptions of the target audience, LFWs, should be used to develop a comprehensive eye safety program; this should include allowing LFWs to select a style from effective prototypes, providing eyewear and promoting/mandating its use in hazardous job tasks, and implementing a comprehensive PPE program for eye safety. In addition, addressing functional problems-falling off, fogging, loss and forgetting glasses, the pace slowdown that reduces production and leads to lower wages for workers-should be addressed.

KW - Agricultural eye injuries

KW - Eye injuries

KW - Hispanic workers

KW - Immigrant health

KW - Migrant farm workers

KW - Ocular hazards

KW - Safety eyewear

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751224192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751224192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J096v11n02_04

DO - 10.1300/J096v11n02_04

M3 - Article

C2 - 17135138

AN - SCOPUS:33751224192

VL - 11

SP - 11

EP - 17

JO - Journal of Agromedicine

JF - Journal of Agromedicine

SN - 1059-924X

IS - 2

ER -