Barriers to ambulatory EHR: Who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Despite existing knowledge regarding electronic health record (EHR) barriers in the ambulatory setting, little is known, specifically, about physicians who are likely to adopt EHR imminently. The current study identifies these imminent adopters and compares their barriers to other physicians. Design and measurements: Mail survey of Florida physicians (n=14 921) about barriers to EHR and adoption intentions. The survey asked respondents to classify themselves as planning to adopt an EHR system within one year (herein referred to as 'imminent adopters'), as planning to adopt an EHR system but not within one year ('interested adopters'), and as not considering an EHR system. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify trends among imminent adopters and to compare barriers among respondents in each of the adoption categories above. Results: A total of 4203 returned surveys represented a 28.2% response rate. Imminent adopters were significantly less likely to be in solo practice (19.6% vs. 40.0%, P<0.001) and more likely to be in an urban area (P=0.044) or in a multi-specialty practice (P=0.023). Imminent adopters were also more likely to be practising family medicine (P-=0.014) or obstetrics/gynæcology (P=0.038). When compared with their colleagues, imminent adopters perceived EHR barriers very dfferently. For example, imminent adopters were significantly less likely to consider upfront cost of hardware/software [OR=0.35 (030, 0.45)] or that an inadequate return on investment [OR=0.25 (0.19, 0.34)] was a major barrier to EHR. Moreover, imminent adopters differed from their colleagues with respect to numerous other productivity-related and technical-ralated barriers. Conclusion: Policy and decision makers interested in promoting the adoption of EHR among physicians should focus on the needs and barriers of those most likely to adopt EHR. Given that imminent adopters differ considerably from their peers, current EHR incentive programmes that focus on financial barriers only might prove sub-optimal in achieving immediate widespread EHR adoption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-108
Number of pages8
JournalInformatics in Primary Care
Volume14
Issue number2
StatePublished - Nov 10 2006

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Health
Physicians
Logistic Models
Obstetrics
Planning
Private Practice
Postal Service
Administrative Personnel
Medicine
Logistics
Motivation
Software
Productivity
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Ambulatory EHR use
  • Barriers
  • Diffusion theory
  • Outpatient EHR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Informatics
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Barriers to ambulatory EHR : Who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians? / Menachemi, Nir.

In: Informatics in Primary Care, Vol. 14, No. 2, 10.11.2006, p. 101-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{119fa06e531d4f4ea3b18c0ffc0dae16,
title = "Barriers to ambulatory EHR: Who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians?",
abstract = "Objective: Despite existing knowledge regarding electronic health record (EHR) barriers in the ambulatory setting, little is known, specifically, about physicians who are likely to adopt EHR imminently. The current study identifies these imminent adopters and compares their barriers to other physicians. Design and measurements: Mail survey of Florida physicians (n=14 921) about barriers to EHR and adoption intentions. The survey asked respondents to classify themselves as planning to adopt an EHR system within one year (herein referred to as 'imminent adopters'), as planning to adopt an EHR system but not within one year ('interested adopters'), and as not considering an EHR system. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify trends among imminent adopters and to compare barriers among respondents in each of the adoption categories above. Results: A total of 4203 returned surveys represented a 28.2{\%} response rate. Imminent adopters were significantly less likely to be in solo practice (19.6{\%} vs. 40.0{\%}, P<0.001) and more likely to be in an urban area (P=0.044) or in a multi-specialty practice (P=0.023). Imminent adopters were also more likely to be practising family medicine (P-=0.014) or obstetrics/gyn{\ae}cology (P=0.038). When compared with their colleagues, imminent adopters perceived EHR barriers very dfferently. For example, imminent adopters were significantly less likely to consider upfront cost of hardware/software [OR=0.35 (030, 0.45)] or that an inadequate return on investment [OR=0.25 (0.19, 0.34)] was a major barrier to EHR. Moreover, imminent adopters differed from their colleagues with respect to numerous other productivity-related and technical-ralated barriers. Conclusion: Policy and decision makers interested in promoting the adoption of EHR among physicians should focus on the needs and barriers of those most likely to adopt EHR. Given that imminent adopters differ considerably from their peers, current EHR incentive programmes that focus on financial barriers only might prove sub-optimal in achieving immediate widespread EHR adoption.",
keywords = "Ambulatory EHR use, Barriers, Diffusion theory, Outpatient EHR",
author = "Nir Menachemi",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "101--108",
journal = "BMJ Health and Care Informatics",
issn = "2058-4555",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to ambulatory EHR

T2 - Who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians?

AU - Menachemi, Nir

PY - 2006/11/10

Y1 - 2006/11/10

N2 - Objective: Despite existing knowledge regarding electronic health record (EHR) barriers in the ambulatory setting, little is known, specifically, about physicians who are likely to adopt EHR imminently. The current study identifies these imminent adopters and compares their barriers to other physicians. Design and measurements: Mail survey of Florida physicians (n=14 921) about barriers to EHR and adoption intentions. The survey asked respondents to classify themselves as planning to adopt an EHR system within one year (herein referred to as 'imminent adopters'), as planning to adopt an EHR system but not within one year ('interested adopters'), and as not considering an EHR system. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify trends among imminent adopters and to compare barriers among respondents in each of the adoption categories above. Results: A total of 4203 returned surveys represented a 28.2% response rate. Imminent adopters were significantly less likely to be in solo practice (19.6% vs. 40.0%, P<0.001) and more likely to be in an urban area (P=0.044) or in a multi-specialty practice (P=0.023). Imminent adopters were also more likely to be practising family medicine (P-=0.014) or obstetrics/gynæcology (P=0.038). When compared with their colleagues, imminent adopters perceived EHR barriers very dfferently. For example, imminent adopters were significantly less likely to consider upfront cost of hardware/software [OR=0.35 (030, 0.45)] or that an inadequate return on investment [OR=0.25 (0.19, 0.34)] was a major barrier to EHR. Moreover, imminent adopters differed from their colleagues with respect to numerous other productivity-related and technical-ralated barriers. Conclusion: Policy and decision makers interested in promoting the adoption of EHR among physicians should focus on the needs and barriers of those most likely to adopt EHR. Given that imminent adopters differ considerably from their peers, current EHR incentive programmes that focus on financial barriers only might prove sub-optimal in achieving immediate widespread EHR adoption.

AB - Objective: Despite existing knowledge regarding electronic health record (EHR) barriers in the ambulatory setting, little is known, specifically, about physicians who are likely to adopt EHR imminently. The current study identifies these imminent adopters and compares their barriers to other physicians. Design and measurements: Mail survey of Florida physicians (n=14 921) about barriers to EHR and adoption intentions. The survey asked respondents to classify themselves as planning to adopt an EHR system within one year (herein referred to as 'imminent adopters'), as planning to adopt an EHR system but not within one year ('interested adopters'), and as not considering an EHR system. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify trends among imminent adopters and to compare barriers among respondents in each of the adoption categories above. Results: A total of 4203 returned surveys represented a 28.2% response rate. Imminent adopters were significantly less likely to be in solo practice (19.6% vs. 40.0%, P<0.001) and more likely to be in an urban area (P=0.044) or in a multi-specialty practice (P=0.023). Imminent adopters were also more likely to be practising family medicine (P-=0.014) or obstetrics/gynæcology (P=0.038). When compared with their colleagues, imminent adopters perceived EHR barriers very dfferently. For example, imminent adopters were significantly less likely to consider upfront cost of hardware/software [OR=0.35 (030, 0.45)] or that an inadequate return on investment [OR=0.25 (0.19, 0.34)] was a major barrier to EHR. Moreover, imminent adopters differed from their colleagues with respect to numerous other productivity-related and technical-ralated barriers. Conclusion: Policy and decision makers interested in promoting the adoption of EHR among physicians should focus on the needs and barriers of those most likely to adopt EHR. Given that imminent adopters differ considerably from their peers, current EHR incentive programmes that focus on financial barriers only might prove sub-optimal in achieving immediate widespread EHR adoption.

KW - Ambulatory EHR use

KW - Barriers

KW - Diffusion theory

KW - Outpatient EHR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747695780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747695780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17059699

AN - SCOPUS:33747695780

VL - 14

SP - 101

EP - 108

JO - BMJ Health and Care Informatics

JF - BMJ Health and Care Informatics

SN - 2058-4555

IS - 2

ER -