Barriers to guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care - A qualitative study

Erin E. Krebs, Alicia A. Bergman, Jessica M. Coffing, Steffanie R. Campbell, Richard Frankel, Marianne Matthias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated poor physician adherence to opioid management guidelines in primary care. The objectives of this qualitative study were to understand physicians' and patients' perspectives on recommended opioid management practices and to identify potential barriers to and facilitators of guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 primary care physicians and 26 of their patients receiving long-term opioid therapy. Data were analyzed using a qualitative immersion/crystallization approach. We identified 3 major barriers to and 1 facilitator of use of recommended opioid management practices. Major barriers were inadequate time and resources available; relying on general impressions of risk for opioid misuse; and viewing opioid monitoring as a "law enforcement" activity. The third barrier was most apparent for physicians in the context of drug testing and for patients in the context of opioid agreements. Beliefs about the need to protect patients from opioid-related harm emerged as a major facilitator, especially among patients.We hypothesize that future interventions to improve opioid management in primary care will be more effective if they address identified barriers and use a patientcentered framework, in which prevention of opioid-related harm to patients is emphasized as the primary goal. Perspective: This article describes primary care perspectives on guideline-recommended opioid management practices. Barriers identified in this study may contribute to underuse of recommended opioid management practices. Consideration of barriers and facilitators to guideline-concordant care could improve effectiveness of future interventions aimed at improving opioid management in primary care.\.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1148-1155
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume15
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Opioid Analgesics
Primary Health Care
Guidelines
Practice Management
Physicians
Patient Harm
Law Enforcement
Primary Care Physicians
Immersion
Crystallization
Interviews

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Guidelines
  • Opioid analgesics
  • Primary care
  • Qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Barriers to guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care - A qualitative study. / Krebs, Erin E.; Bergman, Alicia A.; Coffing, Jessica M.; Campbell, Steffanie R.; Frankel, Richard; Matthias, Marianne.

In: Journal of Pain, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2014, p. 1148-1155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krebs, Erin E. ; Bergman, Alicia A. ; Coffing, Jessica M. ; Campbell, Steffanie R. ; Frankel, Richard ; Matthias, Marianne. / Barriers to guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care - A qualitative study. In: Journal of Pain. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 11. pp. 1148-1155.
@article{61e85c871a4040eebadeb3b1114ca8fe,
title = "Barriers to guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care - A qualitative study",
abstract = "Prior studies have demonstrated poor physician adherence to opioid management guidelines in primary care. The objectives of this qualitative study were to understand physicians' and patients' perspectives on recommended opioid management practices and to identify potential barriers to and facilitators of guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 primary care physicians and 26 of their patients receiving long-term opioid therapy. Data were analyzed using a qualitative immersion/crystallization approach. We identified 3 major barriers to and 1 facilitator of use of recommended opioid management practices. Major barriers were inadequate time and resources available; relying on general impressions of risk for opioid misuse; and viewing opioid monitoring as a {"}law enforcement{"} activity. The third barrier was most apparent for physicians in the context of drug testing and for patients in the context of opioid agreements. Beliefs about the need to protect patients from opioid-related harm emerged as a major facilitator, especially among patients.We hypothesize that future interventions to improve opioid management in primary care will be more effective if they address identified barriers and use a patientcentered framework, in which prevention of opioid-related harm to patients is emphasized as the primary goal. Perspective: This article describes primary care perspectives on guideline-recommended opioid management practices. Barriers identified in this study may contribute to underuse of recommended opioid management practices. Consideration of barriers and facilitators to guideline-concordant care could improve effectiveness of future interventions aimed at improving opioid management in primary care.\.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Guidelines, Opioid analgesics, Primary care, Qualitative research",
author = "Krebs, {Erin E.} and Bergman, {Alicia A.} and Coffing, {Jessica M.} and Campbell, {Steffanie R.} and Richard Frankel and Marianne Matthias",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.006",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1148--1155",
journal = "Journal of Pain",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care - A qualitative study

AU - Krebs, Erin E.

AU - Bergman, Alicia A.

AU - Coffing, Jessica M.

AU - Campbell, Steffanie R.

AU - Frankel, Richard

AU - Matthias, Marianne

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Prior studies have demonstrated poor physician adherence to opioid management guidelines in primary care. The objectives of this qualitative study were to understand physicians' and patients' perspectives on recommended opioid management practices and to identify potential barriers to and facilitators of guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 primary care physicians and 26 of their patients receiving long-term opioid therapy. Data were analyzed using a qualitative immersion/crystallization approach. We identified 3 major barriers to and 1 facilitator of use of recommended opioid management practices. Major barriers were inadequate time and resources available; relying on general impressions of risk for opioid misuse; and viewing opioid monitoring as a "law enforcement" activity. The third barrier was most apparent for physicians in the context of drug testing and for patients in the context of opioid agreements. Beliefs about the need to protect patients from opioid-related harm emerged as a major facilitator, especially among patients.We hypothesize that future interventions to improve opioid management in primary care will be more effective if they address identified barriers and use a patientcentered framework, in which prevention of opioid-related harm to patients is emphasized as the primary goal. Perspective: This article describes primary care perspectives on guideline-recommended opioid management practices. Barriers identified in this study may contribute to underuse of recommended opioid management practices. Consideration of barriers and facilitators to guideline-concordant care could improve effectiveness of future interventions aimed at improving opioid management in primary care.\.

AB - Prior studies have demonstrated poor physician adherence to opioid management guidelines in primary care. The objectives of this qualitative study were to understand physicians' and patients' perspectives on recommended opioid management practices and to identify potential barriers to and facilitators of guideline-concordant opioid management in primary care. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 primary care physicians and 26 of their patients receiving long-term opioid therapy. Data were analyzed using a qualitative immersion/crystallization approach. We identified 3 major barriers to and 1 facilitator of use of recommended opioid management practices. Major barriers were inadequate time and resources available; relying on general impressions of risk for opioid misuse; and viewing opioid monitoring as a "law enforcement" activity. The third barrier was most apparent for physicians in the context of drug testing and for patients in the context of opioid agreements. Beliefs about the need to protect patients from opioid-related harm emerged as a major facilitator, especially among patients.We hypothesize that future interventions to improve opioid management in primary care will be more effective if they address identified barriers and use a patientcentered framework, in which prevention of opioid-related harm to patients is emphasized as the primary goal. Perspective: This article describes primary care perspectives on guideline-recommended opioid management practices. Barriers identified in this study may contribute to underuse of recommended opioid management practices. Consideration of barriers and facilitators to guideline-concordant care could improve effectiveness of future interventions aimed at improving opioid management in primary care.\.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Guidelines

KW - Opioid analgesics

KW - Primary care

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922635983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922635983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1148

EP - 1155

JO - Journal of Pain

JF - Journal of Pain

SN - 1526-5900

IS - 11

ER -