Barriers to insulin initiation: The translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project

Andrew J. Karter, Usha Subramanian, Chandan Saha, Jesse C. Crosson, Melissa M. Parker, Bix E. Swain, Howard H. Moffet, David Marrero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

151 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE- Reasons for failing to initiate prescribed insulin (primary nonadherence) are poorly understood. We investigated barriers to insulin initiation following a new prescription. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- We surveyed insulin-naïve patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, already treated with two or more oral agents who were recently prescribed insulin. We compared responses for respondents prescribed, but never initiating, insulin (n = 69) with those dispensed insulin (n = 100). RESULTS- Subjects failing to initiate prescribed insulin commonly reported misconceptions regarding insulin risk (35% believed that insulin causes blindness, renal failure, amputations, heart attacks, strokes, or early death), plans to instead work harder on behavioral goals, sense of personal failure, low self-efficacy, injection phobia, hypoglycemia concerns, negative impact on social life and job, inadequate health literacy, health care provider inadequately explaining risks/benefits, and limited insulin self-management training. CONCLUSIONS- Primary adherence for insulin may be improved through better provider communication regarding risks, shared decision making, and insulin self-management training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)733-735
Number of pages3
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Insulin
Research
Self Care
Health Literacy
Phobic Disorders
Self Efficacy
Blindness
Amputation
Hypoglycemia
Health Personnel
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Renal Insufficiency
Prescriptions
Decision Making
Research Design
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Communication
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Barriers to insulin initiation : The translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. / Karter, Andrew J.; Subramanian, Usha; Saha, Chandan; Crosson, Jesse C.; Parker, Melissa M.; Swain, Bix E.; Moffet, Howard H.; Marrero, David.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 33, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 733-735.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karter, AJ, Subramanian, U, Saha, C, Crosson, JC, Parker, MM, Swain, BE, Moffet, HH & Marrero, D 2010, 'Barriers to insulin initiation: The translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project', Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 733-735. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1184
Karter, Andrew J. ; Subramanian, Usha ; Saha, Chandan ; Crosson, Jesse C. ; Parker, Melissa M. ; Swain, Bix E. ; Moffet, Howard H. ; Marrero, David. / Barriers to insulin initiation : The translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. In: Diabetes Care. 2010 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 733-735.
@article{0360452a2e354a7f805d62ff7ecf7c6f,
title = "Barriers to insulin initiation: The translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE- Reasons for failing to initiate prescribed insulin (primary nonadherence) are poorly understood. We investigated barriers to insulin initiation following a new prescription. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- We surveyed insulin-na{\"i}ve patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, already treated with two or more oral agents who were recently prescribed insulin. We compared responses for respondents prescribed, but never initiating, insulin (n = 69) with those dispensed insulin (n = 100). RESULTS- Subjects failing to initiate prescribed insulin commonly reported misconceptions regarding insulin risk (35{\%} believed that insulin causes blindness, renal failure, amputations, heart attacks, strokes, or early death), plans to instead work harder on behavioral goals, sense of personal failure, low self-efficacy, injection phobia, hypoglycemia concerns, negative impact on social life and job, inadequate health literacy, health care provider inadequately explaining risks/benefits, and limited insulin self-management training. CONCLUSIONS- Primary adherence for insulin may be improved through better provider communication regarding risks, shared decision making, and insulin self-management training.",
author = "Karter, {Andrew J.} and Usha Subramanian and Chandan Saha and Crosson, {Jesse C.} and Parker, {Melissa M.} and Swain, {Bix E.} and Moffet, {Howard H.} and David Marrero",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.2337/dc09-1184",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "733--735",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to insulin initiation

T2 - The translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project

AU - Karter, Andrew J.

AU - Subramanian, Usha

AU - Saha, Chandan

AU - Crosson, Jesse C.

AU - Parker, Melissa M.

AU - Swain, Bix E.

AU - Moffet, Howard H.

AU - Marrero, David

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE- Reasons for failing to initiate prescribed insulin (primary nonadherence) are poorly understood. We investigated barriers to insulin initiation following a new prescription. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- We surveyed insulin-naïve patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, already treated with two or more oral agents who were recently prescribed insulin. We compared responses for respondents prescribed, but never initiating, insulin (n = 69) with those dispensed insulin (n = 100). RESULTS- Subjects failing to initiate prescribed insulin commonly reported misconceptions regarding insulin risk (35% believed that insulin causes blindness, renal failure, amputations, heart attacks, strokes, or early death), plans to instead work harder on behavioral goals, sense of personal failure, low self-efficacy, injection phobia, hypoglycemia concerns, negative impact on social life and job, inadequate health literacy, health care provider inadequately explaining risks/benefits, and limited insulin self-management training. CONCLUSIONS- Primary adherence for insulin may be improved through better provider communication regarding risks, shared decision making, and insulin self-management training.

AB - OBJECTIVE- Reasons for failing to initiate prescribed insulin (primary nonadherence) are poorly understood. We investigated barriers to insulin initiation following a new prescription. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- We surveyed insulin-naïve patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, already treated with two or more oral agents who were recently prescribed insulin. We compared responses for respondents prescribed, but never initiating, insulin (n = 69) with those dispensed insulin (n = 100). RESULTS- Subjects failing to initiate prescribed insulin commonly reported misconceptions regarding insulin risk (35% believed that insulin causes blindness, renal failure, amputations, heart attacks, strokes, or early death), plans to instead work harder on behavioral goals, sense of personal failure, low self-efficacy, injection phobia, hypoglycemia concerns, negative impact on social life and job, inadequate health literacy, health care provider inadequately explaining risks/benefits, and limited insulin self-management training. CONCLUSIONS- Primary adherence for insulin may be improved through better provider communication regarding risks, shared decision making, and insulin self-management training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953044294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953044294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/dc09-1184

DO - 10.2337/dc09-1184

M3 - Article

C2 - 20086256

AN - SCOPUS:77953044294

VL - 33

SP - 733

EP - 735

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 4

ER -