Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing

Jason Y. Lee, Phillip Mucksavage, Chandru Sundaram, Elspeth M. McDougall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: With the rapid and widespread adoption of robotics in surgery, the minimally invasive surgical landscape has changed markedly within the last half decade. This change has had a significant impact on patients, surgeons and surgical trainees. This is no more apparent than in the field of urology. As with the advent of any new surgical technology, it is imperative that we develop comprehensive and responsible training and credentialing initiatives to ensure surgical outcomes and patient safety are not compromised during the learning process. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted on surgical training curricula as well as robotic surgery training and credentialing to provide best practice recommendations for the development of a robotic surgery training curriculum and credentialing process. Results: For trainees to attain the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective patient care, surgical training in robotics should involve a structured, competency based curriculum that allows the trainee to progress in a graduated fashion. This structured curriculum should involve preclinical and clinical components to facilitate the proper adoption and application of this new technology. Robotic surgery credentialing should involve an expert determined, standardized educational process, including a minimum criterion of proficiency. Conclusions: Rather than being based on a set number of completed cases, robotic surgery credentialing should involve the demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks. In addition, the accreditation process should be iterative to ensure accountability to the patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1191-1197
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume185
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Credentialing
Robotics
Practice Guidelines
Curriculum
Technology
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Accreditation
Social Responsibility
Urology
Patient Safety
Patient Care
Learning
Safety

Keywords

  • credentialing
  • curriculum
  • education, medical
  • internship and residency
  • robotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. / Lee, Jason Y.; Mucksavage, Phillip; Sundaram, Chandru; McDougall, Elspeth M.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 185, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 1191-1197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Jason Y. ; Mucksavage, Phillip ; Sundaram, Chandru ; McDougall, Elspeth M. / Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. In: Journal of Urology. 2011 ; Vol. 185, No. 4. pp. 1191-1197.
@article{30b125e9fdeb41719347cb16135821e3,
title = "Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing",
abstract = "Purpose: With the rapid and widespread adoption of robotics in surgery, the minimally invasive surgical landscape has changed markedly within the last half decade. This change has had a significant impact on patients, surgeons and surgical trainees. This is no more apparent than in the field of urology. As with the advent of any new surgical technology, it is imperative that we develop comprehensive and responsible training and credentialing initiatives to ensure surgical outcomes and patient safety are not compromised during the learning process. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted on surgical training curricula as well as robotic surgery training and credentialing to provide best practice recommendations for the development of a robotic surgery training curriculum and credentialing process. Results: For trainees to attain the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective patient care, surgical training in robotics should involve a structured, competency based curriculum that allows the trainee to progress in a graduated fashion. This structured curriculum should involve preclinical and clinical components to facilitate the proper adoption and application of this new technology. Robotic surgery credentialing should involve an expert determined, standardized educational process, including a minimum criterion of proficiency. Conclusions: Rather than being based on a set number of completed cases, robotic surgery credentialing should involve the demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks. In addition, the accreditation process should be iterative to ensure accountability to the patient.",
keywords = "credentialing, curriculum, education, medical, internship and residency, robotics",
author = "Lee, {Jason Y.} and Phillip Mucksavage and Chandru Sundaram and McDougall, {Elspeth M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.067",
language = "English",
volume = "185",
pages = "1191--1197",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing

AU - Lee, Jason Y.

AU - Mucksavage, Phillip

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

AU - McDougall, Elspeth M.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Purpose: With the rapid and widespread adoption of robotics in surgery, the minimally invasive surgical landscape has changed markedly within the last half decade. This change has had a significant impact on patients, surgeons and surgical trainees. This is no more apparent than in the field of urology. As with the advent of any new surgical technology, it is imperative that we develop comprehensive and responsible training and credentialing initiatives to ensure surgical outcomes and patient safety are not compromised during the learning process. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted on surgical training curricula as well as robotic surgery training and credentialing to provide best practice recommendations for the development of a robotic surgery training curriculum and credentialing process. Results: For trainees to attain the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective patient care, surgical training in robotics should involve a structured, competency based curriculum that allows the trainee to progress in a graduated fashion. This structured curriculum should involve preclinical and clinical components to facilitate the proper adoption and application of this new technology. Robotic surgery credentialing should involve an expert determined, standardized educational process, including a minimum criterion of proficiency. Conclusions: Rather than being based on a set number of completed cases, robotic surgery credentialing should involve the demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks. In addition, the accreditation process should be iterative to ensure accountability to the patient.

AB - Purpose: With the rapid and widespread adoption of robotics in surgery, the minimally invasive surgical landscape has changed markedly within the last half decade. This change has had a significant impact on patients, surgeons and surgical trainees. This is no more apparent than in the field of urology. As with the advent of any new surgical technology, it is imperative that we develop comprehensive and responsible training and credentialing initiatives to ensure surgical outcomes and patient safety are not compromised during the learning process. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted on surgical training curricula as well as robotic surgery training and credentialing to provide best practice recommendations for the development of a robotic surgery training curriculum and credentialing process. Results: For trainees to attain the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective patient care, surgical training in robotics should involve a structured, competency based curriculum that allows the trainee to progress in a graduated fashion. This structured curriculum should involve preclinical and clinical components to facilitate the proper adoption and application of this new technology. Robotic surgery credentialing should involve an expert determined, standardized educational process, including a minimum criterion of proficiency. Conclusions: Rather than being based on a set number of completed cases, robotic surgery credentialing should involve the demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks. In addition, the accreditation process should be iterative to ensure accountability to the patient.

KW - credentialing

KW - curriculum

KW - education, medical

KW - internship and residency

KW - robotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952704195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952704195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.067

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.067

M3 - Article

VL - 185

SP - 1191

EP - 1197

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -