Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics

W. C. Wagner, T.M. Gabriel Chu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

155 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The traditional gold and porcelain fused to metal crowns have been challenged by the esthetic all-ceramic crown materials. Only previous experience with poor mechanical properties, lack of standardized tooth preparation, and processing challenges have prevented universal acceptance of all-ceramic crowns. However, stronger and tougher ceramics and unique processing methods for ceramics have been developed in the past 20 years. In this study, three new ceramic crown core materials were tested to compare their biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness. Ten specimens of Empress, In-Ceram, and Procera AllCeram ceramics were prepared according to their manufacturers' recommendations. The results revealed significant differences in flexural strength for the three materials (p ≤ 0.05). The average flexural strengths of AllCeram, In Ceram, and Empress ceramics were 687 MPa, 352 MPa, and 134 MPa respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the fracture toughness of Procera (4.48 MPa · m1/2) and In-Ceram ceramics (4.49 MPa · m1/2); however, both ceramics had significantly higher fracture toughness (p <0.005) than Empress ceramic (1.74 MPa · m1/2).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)140-144
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume76
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ceramics
Tooth
Crowns
Tooth Preparation
Dental Porcelain
Esthetics
Gold
Metals
In-Ceram

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics. / Wagner, W. C.; Chu, T.M. Gabriel.

In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 76, No. 2, 1996, p. 140-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f759c4499f6d45fa84c33d44067f8020,
title = "Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics",
abstract = "The traditional gold and porcelain fused to metal crowns have been challenged by the esthetic all-ceramic crown materials. Only previous experience with poor mechanical properties, lack of standardized tooth preparation, and processing challenges have prevented universal acceptance of all-ceramic crowns. However, stronger and tougher ceramics and unique processing methods for ceramics have been developed in the past 20 years. In this study, three new ceramic crown core materials were tested to compare their biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness. Ten specimens of Empress, In-Ceram, and Procera AllCeram ceramics were prepared according to their manufacturers' recommendations. The results revealed significant differences in flexural strength for the three materials (p ≤ 0.05). The average flexural strengths of AllCeram, In Ceram, and Empress ceramics were 687 MPa, 352 MPa, and 134 MPa respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the fracture toughness of Procera (4.48 MPa · m1/2) and In-Ceram ceramics (4.49 MPa · m1/2); however, both ceramics had significantly higher fracture toughness (p <0.005) than Empress ceramic (1.74 MPa · m1/2).",
author = "Wagner, {W. C.} and Chu, {T.M. Gabriel}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "140--144",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",
issn = "0022-3913",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics

AU - Wagner, W. C.

AU - Chu, T.M. Gabriel

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The traditional gold and porcelain fused to metal crowns have been challenged by the esthetic all-ceramic crown materials. Only previous experience with poor mechanical properties, lack of standardized tooth preparation, and processing challenges have prevented universal acceptance of all-ceramic crowns. However, stronger and tougher ceramics and unique processing methods for ceramics have been developed in the past 20 years. In this study, three new ceramic crown core materials were tested to compare their biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness. Ten specimens of Empress, In-Ceram, and Procera AllCeram ceramics were prepared according to their manufacturers' recommendations. The results revealed significant differences in flexural strength for the three materials (p ≤ 0.05). The average flexural strengths of AllCeram, In Ceram, and Empress ceramics were 687 MPa, 352 MPa, and 134 MPa respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the fracture toughness of Procera (4.48 MPa · m1/2) and In-Ceram ceramics (4.49 MPa · m1/2); however, both ceramics had significantly higher fracture toughness (p <0.005) than Empress ceramic (1.74 MPa · m1/2).

AB - The traditional gold and porcelain fused to metal crowns have been challenged by the esthetic all-ceramic crown materials. Only previous experience with poor mechanical properties, lack of standardized tooth preparation, and processing challenges have prevented universal acceptance of all-ceramic crowns. However, stronger and tougher ceramics and unique processing methods for ceramics have been developed in the past 20 years. In this study, three new ceramic crown core materials were tested to compare their biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness. Ten specimens of Empress, In-Ceram, and Procera AllCeram ceramics were prepared according to their manufacturers' recommendations. The results revealed significant differences in flexural strength for the three materials (p ≤ 0.05). The average flexural strengths of AllCeram, In Ceram, and Empress ceramics were 687 MPa, 352 MPa, and 134 MPa respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the fracture toughness of Procera (4.48 MPa · m1/2) and In-Ceram ceramics (4.49 MPa · m1/2); however, both ceramics had significantly higher fracture toughness (p <0.005) than Empress ceramic (1.74 MPa · m1/2).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030208953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030208953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 140

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

SN - 0022-3913

IS - 2

ER -