Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history

Faisal Khan, Morgan M. Sandelski, Jeffrey D. Rytlewski, Jennifer Lamb, Christina Pedro, Michael B.N. Adjei, Shatoria Lunsford, James P. Fischer, Austin E. Wininger, Elizabeth C. Whipple, Randall Loder, Melissa Kacena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The existence of a gender gap in academia has been a hotly debated topic over the past several decades. It has been argued that due to the gender gap, it is more difficult for women to obtain higher positions. Manuscripts serve as an important measurement of one's accomplishments within a particular field of academia. Here, we analyzed, over the past 3 decades, authorship and other trends in manuscripts published in BONE, one of the premier journals in the field of bone and mineral metabolism. For this study, one complete year of manuscripts was evaluated (e.g. 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015) for each decade. A bibliometric analysis was then performed of authorship trends for those manuscripts. Analyzed fields included: average number of authors per manuscript, numerical position of the corresponding author, number of institutions collaborating on each manuscript, number of countries involved with each manuscript, number of references, and number of citations per manuscript. Each of these fields increased significantly over the 30-year time frame (p < 10− 6). The gender of both the first and corresponding authors was identified and analyzed over time and by region. There was a significant increase in the percentage of female first authors from 23.4% in 1985 to 47.8% in 2015 (p = 0.001). The percentage of female corresponding authors also increased from 21.2% in 1985 to 35.4% in 2015 although it was not significant (p = 0.07). With such a substantial emphasis being placed on publishing in academic medicine, it is crucial to comprehend the changes in publishing characteristics over time and geographical region. These findings highlight authorship trends in BONE over time as well as by region. Importantly, these findings also highlight where challenges still exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-35
Number of pages9
JournalBone
Volume107
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Bibliometrics
Authorship
Manuscripts
Publications
History
Minerals
Medicine
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Authorship trends
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Bone
  • Gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Physiology
  • Histology

Cite this

Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history. / Khan, Faisal; Sandelski, Morgan M.; Rytlewski, Jeffrey D.; Lamb, Jennifer; Pedro, Christina; Adjei, Michael B.N.; Lunsford, Shatoria; Fischer, James P.; Wininger, Austin E.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Loder, Randall; Kacena, Melissa.

In: Bone, Vol. 107, 01.02.2018, p. 27-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khan, F, Sandelski, MM, Rytlewski, JD, Lamb, J, Pedro, C, Adjei, MBN, Lunsford, S, Fischer, JP, Wininger, AE, Whipple, EC, Loder, R & Kacena, M 2018, 'Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history', Bone, vol. 107, pp. 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.10.026
Khan, Faisal ; Sandelski, Morgan M. ; Rytlewski, Jeffrey D. ; Lamb, Jennifer ; Pedro, Christina ; Adjei, Michael B.N. ; Lunsford, Shatoria ; Fischer, James P. ; Wininger, Austin E. ; Whipple, Elizabeth C. ; Loder, Randall ; Kacena, Melissa. / Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history. In: Bone. 2018 ; Vol. 107. pp. 27-35.
@article{5e1ad142d85a42bfb4885f9518f07bf9,
title = "Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history",
abstract = "The existence of a gender gap in academia has been a hotly debated topic over the past several decades. It has been argued that due to the gender gap, it is more difficult for women to obtain higher positions. Manuscripts serve as an important measurement of one's accomplishments within a particular field of academia. Here, we analyzed, over the past 3 decades, authorship and other trends in manuscripts published in BONE, one of the premier journals in the field of bone and mineral metabolism. For this study, one complete year of manuscripts was evaluated (e.g. 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015) for each decade. A bibliometric analysis was then performed of authorship trends for those manuscripts. Analyzed fields included: average number of authors per manuscript, numerical position of the corresponding author, number of institutions collaborating on each manuscript, number of countries involved with each manuscript, number of references, and number of citations per manuscript. Each of these fields increased significantly over the 30-year time frame (p < 10− 6). The gender of both the first and corresponding authors was identified and analyzed over time and by region. There was a significant increase in the percentage of female first authors from 23.4{\%} in 1985 to 47.8{\%} in 2015 (p = 0.001). The percentage of female corresponding authors also increased from 21.2{\%} in 1985 to 35.4{\%} in 2015 although it was not significant (p = 0.07). With such a substantial emphasis being placed on publishing in academic medicine, it is crucial to comprehend the changes in publishing characteristics over time and geographical region. These findings highlight authorship trends in BONE over time as well as by region. Importantly, these findings also highlight where challenges still exist.",
keywords = "Authorship trends, Bibliometric analysis, Bone, Gender",
author = "Faisal Khan and Sandelski, {Morgan M.} and Rytlewski, {Jeffrey D.} and Jennifer Lamb and Christina Pedro and Adjei, {Michael B.N.} and Shatoria Lunsford and Fischer, {James P.} and Wininger, {Austin E.} and Whipple, {Elizabeth C.} and Randall Loder and Melissa Kacena",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bone.2017.10.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "27--35",
journal = "Bone",
issn = "8756-3282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history

AU - Khan, Faisal

AU - Sandelski, Morgan M.

AU - Rytlewski, Jeffrey D.

AU - Lamb, Jennifer

AU - Pedro, Christina

AU - Adjei, Michael B.N.

AU - Lunsford, Shatoria

AU - Fischer, James P.

AU - Wininger, Austin E.

AU - Whipple, Elizabeth C.

AU - Loder, Randall

AU - Kacena, Melissa

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - The existence of a gender gap in academia has been a hotly debated topic over the past several decades. It has been argued that due to the gender gap, it is more difficult for women to obtain higher positions. Manuscripts serve as an important measurement of one's accomplishments within a particular field of academia. Here, we analyzed, over the past 3 decades, authorship and other trends in manuscripts published in BONE, one of the premier journals in the field of bone and mineral metabolism. For this study, one complete year of manuscripts was evaluated (e.g. 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015) for each decade. A bibliometric analysis was then performed of authorship trends for those manuscripts. Analyzed fields included: average number of authors per manuscript, numerical position of the corresponding author, number of institutions collaborating on each manuscript, number of countries involved with each manuscript, number of references, and number of citations per manuscript. Each of these fields increased significantly over the 30-year time frame (p < 10− 6). The gender of both the first and corresponding authors was identified and analyzed over time and by region. There was a significant increase in the percentage of female first authors from 23.4% in 1985 to 47.8% in 2015 (p = 0.001). The percentage of female corresponding authors also increased from 21.2% in 1985 to 35.4% in 2015 although it was not significant (p = 0.07). With such a substantial emphasis being placed on publishing in academic medicine, it is crucial to comprehend the changes in publishing characteristics over time and geographical region. These findings highlight authorship trends in BONE over time as well as by region. Importantly, these findings also highlight where challenges still exist.

AB - The existence of a gender gap in academia has been a hotly debated topic over the past several decades. It has been argued that due to the gender gap, it is more difficult for women to obtain higher positions. Manuscripts serve as an important measurement of one's accomplishments within a particular field of academia. Here, we analyzed, over the past 3 decades, authorship and other trends in manuscripts published in BONE, one of the premier journals in the field of bone and mineral metabolism. For this study, one complete year of manuscripts was evaluated (e.g. 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015) for each decade. A bibliometric analysis was then performed of authorship trends for those manuscripts. Analyzed fields included: average number of authors per manuscript, numerical position of the corresponding author, number of institutions collaborating on each manuscript, number of countries involved with each manuscript, number of references, and number of citations per manuscript. Each of these fields increased significantly over the 30-year time frame (p < 10− 6). The gender of both the first and corresponding authors was identified and analyzed over time and by region. There was a significant increase in the percentage of female first authors from 23.4% in 1985 to 47.8% in 2015 (p = 0.001). The percentage of female corresponding authors also increased from 21.2% in 1985 to 35.4% in 2015 although it was not significant (p = 0.07). With such a substantial emphasis being placed on publishing in academic medicine, it is crucial to comprehend the changes in publishing characteristics over time and geographical region. These findings highlight authorship trends in BONE over time as well as by region. Importantly, these findings also highlight where challenges still exist.

KW - Authorship trends

KW - Bibliometric analysis

KW - Bone

KW - Gender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033222992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033222992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2017.10.026

DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2017.10.026

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 27

EP - 35

JO - Bone

JF - Bone

SN - 8756-3282

ER -