Bioethics for clinicians

13. Resource allocation

Martin F. McKneally, Bernard M. Dickens, Eric M. Meslin, Peter A. Singer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Questions of resource allocation can pose practical and ethical dilemmas for clinicians. In the Aristotelian conception of distributive justice, the unequal allocation of a scarce resource may be justified by morally relevant factors such as need or likelihood of benefit. Even using these criteria, it can be difficult to reconcile completing claims to determine which patients should be given priority. To what extent the physician's fiduciary duty toward a patient should supersede the interests of other patients and society as a whole is also a matter of controversy. Although the courts have been reluctant to become involved in allocation decisions in health care, they expect physicians to show allegiance to their patients regardless of budgetary concerns. The allocation of resources on the basis of clinically irrelevant factors such as religion or sexual orientation is prohibited. Clear, fair and publicly acceptable institutional and professional policies can help to ensure that resource allocation decisions are transparent and defensible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-167
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Medical Association Journal
Volume157
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bioethics
Resource Allocation
Organizational Policy
Physicians
Social Justice
Religion
Sexual Behavior
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

McKneally, M. F., Dickens, B. M., Meslin, E. M., & Singer, P. A. (1997). Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157(2), 163-167.

Bioethics for clinicians : 13. Resource allocation. / McKneally, Martin F.; Dickens, Bernard M.; Meslin, Eric M.; Singer, Peter A.

In: Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol. 157, No. 2, 1997, p. 163-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKneally, MF, Dickens, BM, Meslin, EM & Singer, PA 1997, 'Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation', Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 163-167.
McKneally MF, Dickens BM, Meslin EM, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1997;157(2):163-167.
McKneally, Martin F. ; Dickens, Bernard M. ; Meslin, Eric M. ; Singer, Peter A. / Bioethics for clinicians : 13. Resource allocation. In: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1997 ; Vol. 157, No. 2. pp. 163-167.
@article{4b9527a4e80348c9b3ce6b7bb22966a5,
title = "Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation",
abstract = "Questions of resource allocation can pose practical and ethical dilemmas for clinicians. In the Aristotelian conception of distributive justice, the unequal allocation of a scarce resource may be justified by morally relevant factors such as need or likelihood of benefit. Even using these criteria, it can be difficult to reconcile completing claims to determine which patients should be given priority. To what extent the physician's fiduciary duty toward a patient should supersede the interests of other patients and society as a whole is also a matter of controversy. Although the courts have been reluctant to become involved in allocation decisions in health care, they expect physicians to show allegiance to their patients regardless of budgetary concerns. The allocation of resources on the basis of clinically irrelevant factors such as religion or sexual orientation is prohibited. Clear, fair and publicly acceptable institutional and professional policies can help to ensure that resource allocation decisions are transparent and defensible.",
author = "McKneally, {Martin F.} and Dickens, {Bernard M.} and Meslin, {Eric M.} and Singer, {Peter A.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "157",
pages = "163--167",
journal = "CMAJ",
issn = "0008-4409",
publisher = "Canadian Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bioethics for clinicians

T2 - 13. Resource allocation

AU - McKneally, Martin F.

AU - Dickens, Bernard M.

AU - Meslin, Eric M.

AU - Singer, Peter A.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Questions of resource allocation can pose practical and ethical dilemmas for clinicians. In the Aristotelian conception of distributive justice, the unequal allocation of a scarce resource may be justified by morally relevant factors such as need or likelihood of benefit. Even using these criteria, it can be difficult to reconcile completing claims to determine which patients should be given priority. To what extent the physician's fiduciary duty toward a patient should supersede the interests of other patients and society as a whole is also a matter of controversy. Although the courts have been reluctant to become involved in allocation decisions in health care, they expect physicians to show allegiance to their patients regardless of budgetary concerns. The allocation of resources on the basis of clinically irrelevant factors such as religion or sexual orientation is prohibited. Clear, fair and publicly acceptable institutional and professional policies can help to ensure that resource allocation decisions are transparent and defensible.

AB - Questions of resource allocation can pose practical and ethical dilemmas for clinicians. In the Aristotelian conception of distributive justice, the unequal allocation of a scarce resource may be justified by morally relevant factors such as need or likelihood of benefit. Even using these criteria, it can be difficult to reconcile completing claims to determine which patients should be given priority. To what extent the physician's fiduciary duty toward a patient should supersede the interests of other patients and society as a whole is also a matter of controversy. Although the courts have been reluctant to become involved in allocation decisions in health care, they expect physicians to show allegiance to their patients regardless of budgetary concerns. The allocation of resources on the basis of clinically irrelevant factors such as religion or sexual orientation is prohibited. Clear, fair and publicly acceptable institutional and professional policies can help to ensure that resource allocation decisions are transparent and defensible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030741549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030741549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 157

SP - 163

EP - 167

JO - CMAJ

JF - CMAJ

SN - 0008-4409

IS - 2

ER -