Bisphosphonates do not inhibit periosteal bone formation in estrogen deficient animals and allow enhanced bone modeling in response to mechanical loading

Anthony Feher, Andrew Koivunemi, Mark Koivunemi, Robyn K. Fuchs, David B. Burr, Roger J. Phipps, Susan Reinwald, Matthew R. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

The suppressive effects of bisphosphonates (BPs) on bone remodeling are clear yet there is conflicting data concerning the effects of BPs on modeling (specifically formation modeling on the periosteal surface). The normal periosteal expansion that occurs during aging has significant benefits to maintaining/improving the bones' mechanical properties and thus it is important to understand whether BPs affect this bone surface. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of BPs on periosteal bone formation modeling induced by ovariectomy (OVX) and mechanical loading. Six-month-old Sprague-Dawley OVX rats (n = 60; 12/group) were administered vehicle, risedronate, alendronate, or zoledronate at doses used clinically for treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Three weeks after initiating BP treatment, all animals underwent in vivo ulnar loading of the right limb every other day for 1 week (3 total sessions). Periosteal surface mineral apposition rate, mineralizing surface, and bone formation rate were determined at the mid-diaphysis of both loaded (right) and non-loaded (left) ulnae. There was no significant effect of any of the BPs on periosteal bone formation parameters compared to VEH-treated animals in the non-loaded limb, suggesting that BP treatment does not compromise the normal periosteal expansion associated with estrogen loss. Mechanical loading significantly increased BFR in the loaded limb compared to the non-loaded limb in all BP-treated groups, with no difference in the magnitude of this effect among the various BPs. Collectively, these data show that BP treatment, at doses comparable to those used for treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis, (1) does not alter the periosteal formation activity that occurs in the absence of estrogen and (2) allows normal stimulation of periosteal bone formation in response to the anabolic stimulation of mechanical loading.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-207
Number of pages5
JournalBone
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Keywords

  • Alendronate
  • Ovariectomy
  • Risedronate
  • Ulna loading
  • Zoledronate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Histology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bisphosphonates do not inhibit periosteal bone formation in estrogen deficient animals and allow enhanced bone modeling in response to mechanical loading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this