Bone and muscle: Interactions beyond mechanical

Marco Brotto, Lynda Bonewald

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The musculoskeletal system is significantly more complex than portrayed by traditional reductionist approaches that have focused on and studied the components of this system separately. While bone and skeletal muscle are the two largest tissues within this system, this system also includes tendons, ligaments, cartilage, joints and other connective tissues along with vascular and nervous tissues. Because the main function of this system is locomotion, the mechanical interaction among the major players of this system is essential for the many shapes and forms observed in vertebrates and even in invertebrates. Thus, it is logical that the mechanical coupling theories of musculoskeletal development exert a dominant influence on our understanding of the biology of the musculoskeletal system, because these relationships are relatively easy to observe, measure, and perturb. Certainly much less recognized is the molecular and biochemical interaction among the individual players of the musculoskeletal system.In this brief review article, we first introduce some of the key reasons why the mechanical coupling theory has dominated our view of bone-muscle interactions followed by summarizing evidence for the secretory nature of bones and muscles. Finally, a number of highly physiological questions that cannot be answered by the mechanical theories alone will be raised along with different lines of evidence that support both a genetic and a biochemical communication between bones and muscles. It is hoped that these discussions will stimulate new insights into this fertile and promising new way of defining the relationships between these closely related tissues. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for biochemical communication between bone and muscle is important not only from a basic research perspective but also as a means to identify potential new therapies for bone and muscle diseases, especially for when they co-exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-114
Number of pages6
JournalBone
Volume80
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Musculoskeletal System
Bone and Bones
Muscles
Musculoskeletal Development
Communication
Nerve Tissue
Bone Diseases
Invertebrates
Locomotion
Ligaments
Tendons
Connective Tissue
Cartilage
Blood Vessels
Vertebrates
Molecular Biology
Skeletal Muscle
Joints
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Bone-muscle crosstalk
  • Gene pleiotropy
  • Muscle
  • Secreted factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Histology
  • Physiology

Cite this

Bone and muscle : Interactions beyond mechanical. / Brotto, Marco; Bonewald, Lynda.

In: Bone, Vol. 80, 01.11.2015, p. 109-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Brotto, Marco ; Bonewald, Lynda. / Bone and muscle : Interactions beyond mechanical. In: Bone. 2015 ; Vol. 80. pp. 109-114.
@article{6c1e5bb7093541d99266f13020c1eca3,
title = "Bone and muscle: Interactions beyond mechanical",
abstract = "The musculoskeletal system is significantly more complex than portrayed by traditional reductionist approaches that have focused on and studied the components of this system separately. While bone and skeletal muscle are the two largest tissues within this system, this system also includes tendons, ligaments, cartilage, joints and other connective tissues along with vascular and nervous tissues. Because the main function of this system is locomotion, the mechanical interaction among the major players of this system is essential for the many shapes and forms observed in vertebrates and even in invertebrates. Thus, it is logical that the mechanical coupling theories of musculoskeletal development exert a dominant influence on our understanding of the biology of the musculoskeletal system, because these relationships are relatively easy to observe, measure, and perturb. Certainly much less recognized is the molecular and biochemical interaction among the individual players of the musculoskeletal system.In this brief review article, we first introduce some of the key reasons why the mechanical coupling theory has dominated our view of bone-muscle interactions followed by summarizing evidence for the secretory nature of bones and muscles. Finally, a number of highly physiological questions that cannot be answered by the mechanical theories alone will be raised along with different lines of evidence that support both a genetic and a biochemical communication between bones and muscles. It is hoped that these discussions will stimulate new insights into this fertile and promising new way of defining the relationships between these closely related tissues. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for biochemical communication between bone and muscle is important not only from a basic research perspective but also as a means to identify potential new therapies for bone and muscle diseases, especially for when they co-exist.",
keywords = "Bone, Bone-muscle crosstalk, Gene pleiotropy, Muscle, Secreted factors",
author = "Marco Brotto and Lynda Bonewald",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "109--114",
journal = "Bone",
issn = "8756-3282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone and muscle

T2 - Interactions beyond mechanical

AU - Brotto, Marco

AU - Bonewald, Lynda

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - The musculoskeletal system is significantly more complex than portrayed by traditional reductionist approaches that have focused on and studied the components of this system separately. While bone and skeletal muscle are the two largest tissues within this system, this system also includes tendons, ligaments, cartilage, joints and other connective tissues along with vascular and nervous tissues. Because the main function of this system is locomotion, the mechanical interaction among the major players of this system is essential for the many shapes and forms observed in vertebrates and even in invertebrates. Thus, it is logical that the mechanical coupling theories of musculoskeletal development exert a dominant influence on our understanding of the biology of the musculoskeletal system, because these relationships are relatively easy to observe, measure, and perturb. Certainly much less recognized is the molecular and biochemical interaction among the individual players of the musculoskeletal system.In this brief review article, we first introduce some of the key reasons why the mechanical coupling theory has dominated our view of bone-muscle interactions followed by summarizing evidence for the secretory nature of bones and muscles. Finally, a number of highly physiological questions that cannot be answered by the mechanical theories alone will be raised along with different lines of evidence that support both a genetic and a biochemical communication between bones and muscles. It is hoped that these discussions will stimulate new insights into this fertile and promising new way of defining the relationships between these closely related tissues. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for biochemical communication between bone and muscle is important not only from a basic research perspective but also as a means to identify potential new therapies for bone and muscle diseases, especially for when they co-exist.

AB - The musculoskeletal system is significantly more complex than portrayed by traditional reductionist approaches that have focused on and studied the components of this system separately. While bone and skeletal muscle are the two largest tissues within this system, this system also includes tendons, ligaments, cartilage, joints and other connective tissues along with vascular and nervous tissues. Because the main function of this system is locomotion, the mechanical interaction among the major players of this system is essential for the many shapes and forms observed in vertebrates and even in invertebrates. Thus, it is logical that the mechanical coupling theories of musculoskeletal development exert a dominant influence on our understanding of the biology of the musculoskeletal system, because these relationships are relatively easy to observe, measure, and perturb. Certainly much less recognized is the molecular and biochemical interaction among the individual players of the musculoskeletal system.In this brief review article, we first introduce some of the key reasons why the mechanical coupling theory has dominated our view of bone-muscle interactions followed by summarizing evidence for the secretory nature of bones and muscles. Finally, a number of highly physiological questions that cannot be answered by the mechanical theories alone will be raised along with different lines of evidence that support both a genetic and a biochemical communication between bones and muscles. It is hoped that these discussions will stimulate new insights into this fertile and promising new way of defining the relationships between these closely related tissues. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for biochemical communication between bone and muscle is important not only from a basic research perspective but also as a means to identify potential new therapies for bone and muscle diseases, especially for when they co-exist.

KW - Bone

KW - Bone-muscle crosstalk

KW - Gene pleiotropy

KW - Muscle

KW - Secreted factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943605262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943605262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.010

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26453500

AN - SCOPUS:84943605262

VL - 80

SP - 109

EP - 114

JO - Bone

JF - Bone

SN - 8756-3282

ER -