Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse

Yuri A. Pishchalnikov, James A. McAteer, Irina V. Pishchalnikova, James Williams, Michael R. Bailey, Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), firing shock pulses at slow pulse repetition frequency (0.5 Hz) is more effective at breaking kidney stones than firing shock waves (SWs) at fast rate (2 Hz). Since at fast rate the number of cavitation bubbles increases, it appears that bubble proliferation reduces the efficiency of SWL. The goal of this work was to determine the basis for bubble proliferation when SWs are delivered at fast rate. Bubbles were studied using a high-speed camera (Imacon 200). Experiments were conducted in a test tank filled with nondegassed tap water at room temperature. Acoustic pulses were generated with an electromagnetic lithotripter (DoLi-50). In the focus of the lithotripter the pulses consisted of a ∼60MPa positive-pressure spike followed by up to -8MPa negative-pressure tail, all with a total duration of about 7 μs. Nonlinear propagation steepened the shock front of the pulses to become sufficiently thin (∼0.03 μm) to impose differential pressure across even microscopic bubbles. High-speed camera movies showed that the SWs forced preexisting microbubbles to collapse, jet, and break up into daughter bubbles, which then grew rapidly under the negative-pressure phase of the pulse, but later coalesced to re-form a single bubble. Subsequent bubble growth was followed by inertial collapse and, usually, rebound. Most, if not all, cavitation bubbles emitted micro-jets during their first inertial collapse and re-growth. After jetting, these rebounding bubbles could regain a spherical shape before undergoing a second inertial collapse. However, either upon this second inertial collapse, or sometimes upon the first inertial collapse, the rebounding bubble emerged from the collapse as a cloud of smaller bubbles rather than a single bubble. These daughter bubbles could continue to rebound and collapse for a few cycles, but did not coalesce. These observations show that the positive-pressure phase of SWs fragments preexisting bubbles but this initial fragmentation does not yield bubble proliferation, as the daughter bubbles coalesce to reform a single bubble. Instead, bubble proliferation is the product of the subsequent inertial collapses.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAIP Conference Proceedings
Pages460-463
Number of pages4
Volume1022
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Event18th International Symposium on Nonlinear Acoustics, ISNA18 - Stockholm, Sweden
Duration: Jul 7 2008Jul 10 2008

Other

Other18th International Symposium on Nonlinear Acoustics, ISNA18
CountrySweden
CityStockholm
Period7/7/087/10/08

Fingerprint

shock waves
bubbles
pulses
high speed cameras
cavitation flow
kidney stones
differential pressure
shock fronts
taps
spikes
repetition
fragmentation

Keywords

  • Cavitation
  • Cavitation nuclei
  • High-speed photography
  • Microbubbles
  • Shock waves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Pishchalnikov, Y. A., McAteer, J. A., Pishchalnikova, I. V., Williams, J., Bailey, M. R., & Sapozhnikov, O. A. (2008). Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1022, pp. 460-463) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2956259

Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse. / Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.; McAteer, James A.; Pishchalnikova, Irina V.; Williams, James; Bailey, Michael R.; Sapozhnikov, Oleg A.

AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1022 2008. p. 460-463.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Pishchalnikov, YA, McAteer, JA, Pishchalnikova, IV, Williams, J, Bailey, MR & Sapozhnikov, OA 2008, Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse. in AIP Conference Proceedings. vol. 1022, pp. 460-463, 18th International Symposium on Nonlinear Acoustics, ISNA18, Stockholm, Sweden, 7/7/08. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2956259
Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Pishchalnikova IV, Williams J, Bailey MR, Sapozhnikov OA. Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse. In AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1022. 2008. p. 460-463 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2956259
Pishchalnikov, Yuri A. ; McAteer, James A. ; Pishchalnikova, Irina V. ; Williams, James ; Bailey, Michael R. ; Sapozhnikov, Oleg A. / Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1022 2008. pp. 460-463
@inproceedings{88a496da4cda4bf1ac6ba0a3010dd347,
title = "Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse",
abstract = "In shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), firing shock pulses at slow pulse repetition frequency (0.5 Hz) is more effective at breaking kidney stones than firing shock waves (SWs) at fast rate (2 Hz). Since at fast rate the number of cavitation bubbles increases, it appears that bubble proliferation reduces the efficiency of SWL. The goal of this work was to determine the basis for bubble proliferation when SWs are delivered at fast rate. Bubbles were studied using a high-speed camera (Imacon 200). Experiments were conducted in a test tank filled with nondegassed tap water at room temperature. Acoustic pulses were generated with an electromagnetic lithotripter (DoLi-50). In the focus of the lithotripter the pulses consisted of a ∼60MPa positive-pressure spike followed by up to -8MPa negative-pressure tail, all with a total duration of about 7 μs. Nonlinear propagation steepened the shock front of the pulses to become sufficiently thin (∼0.03 μm) to impose differential pressure across even microscopic bubbles. High-speed camera movies showed that the SWs forced preexisting microbubbles to collapse, jet, and break up into daughter bubbles, which then grew rapidly under the negative-pressure phase of the pulse, but later coalesced to re-form a single bubble. Subsequent bubble growth was followed by inertial collapse and, usually, rebound. Most, if not all, cavitation bubbles emitted micro-jets during their first inertial collapse and re-growth. After jetting, these rebounding bubbles could regain a spherical shape before undergoing a second inertial collapse. However, either upon this second inertial collapse, or sometimes upon the first inertial collapse, the rebounding bubble emerged from the collapse as a cloud of smaller bubbles rather than a single bubble. These daughter bubbles could continue to rebound and collapse for a few cycles, but did not coalesce. These observations show that the positive-pressure phase of SWs fragments preexisting bubbles but this initial fragmentation does not yield bubble proliferation, as the daughter bubbles coalesce to reform a single bubble. Instead, bubble proliferation is the product of the subsequent inertial collapses.",
keywords = "Cavitation, Cavitation nuclei, High-speed photography, Microbubbles, Shock waves",
author = "Pishchalnikov, {Yuri A.} and McAteer, {James A.} and Pishchalnikova, {Irina V.} and James Williams and Bailey, {Michael R.} and Sapozhnikov, {Oleg A.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1063/1.2956259",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780735405448",
volume = "1022",
pages = "460--463",
booktitle = "AIP Conference Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Bubble proliferation in shock wave lithotripsy occurs during inertial collapse

AU - Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.

AU - McAteer, James A.

AU - Pishchalnikova, Irina V.

AU - Williams, James

AU - Bailey, Michael R.

AU - Sapozhnikov, Oleg A.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), firing shock pulses at slow pulse repetition frequency (0.5 Hz) is more effective at breaking kidney stones than firing shock waves (SWs) at fast rate (2 Hz). Since at fast rate the number of cavitation bubbles increases, it appears that bubble proliferation reduces the efficiency of SWL. The goal of this work was to determine the basis for bubble proliferation when SWs are delivered at fast rate. Bubbles were studied using a high-speed camera (Imacon 200). Experiments were conducted in a test tank filled with nondegassed tap water at room temperature. Acoustic pulses were generated with an electromagnetic lithotripter (DoLi-50). In the focus of the lithotripter the pulses consisted of a ∼60MPa positive-pressure spike followed by up to -8MPa negative-pressure tail, all with a total duration of about 7 μs. Nonlinear propagation steepened the shock front of the pulses to become sufficiently thin (∼0.03 μm) to impose differential pressure across even microscopic bubbles. High-speed camera movies showed that the SWs forced preexisting microbubbles to collapse, jet, and break up into daughter bubbles, which then grew rapidly under the negative-pressure phase of the pulse, but later coalesced to re-form a single bubble. Subsequent bubble growth was followed by inertial collapse and, usually, rebound. Most, if not all, cavitation bubbles emitted micro-jets during their first inertial collapse and re-growth. After jetting, these rebounding bubbles could regain a spherical shape before undergoing a second inertial collapse. However, either upon this second inertial collapse, or sometimes upon the first inertial collapse, the rebounding bubble emerged from the collapse as a cloud of smaller bubbles rather than a single bubble. These daughter bubbles could continue to rebound and collapse for a few cycles, but did not coalesce. These observations show that the positive-pressure phase of SWs fragments preexisting bubbles but this initial fragmentation does not yield bubble proliferation, as the daughter bubbles coalesce to reform a single bubble. Instead, bubble proliferation is the product of the subsequent inertial collapses.

AB - In shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), firing shock pulses at slow pulse repetition frequency (0.5 Hz) is more effective at breaking kidney stones than firing shock waves (SWs) at fast rate (2 Hz). Since at fast rate the number of cavitation bubbles increases, it appears that bubble proliferation reduces the efficiency of SWL. The goal of this work was to determine the basis for bubble proliferation when SWs are delivered at fast rate. Bubbles were studied using a high-speed camera (Imacon 200). Experiments were conducted in a test tank filled with nondegassed tap water at room temperature. Acoustic pulses were generated with an electromagnetic lithotripter (DoLi-50). In the focus of the lithotripter the pulses consisted of a ∼60MPa positive-pressure spike followed by up to -8MPa negative-pressure tail, all with a total duration of about 7 μs. Nonlinear propagation steepened the shock front of the pulses to become sufficiently thin (∼0.03 μm) to impose differential pressure across even microscopic bubbles. High-speed camera movies showed that the SWs forced preexisting microbubbles to collapse, jet, and break up into daughter bubbles, which then grew rapidly under the negative-pressure phase of the pulse, but later coalesced to re-form a single bubble. Subsequent bubble growth was followed by inertial collapse and, usually, rebound. Most, if not all, cavitation bubbles emitted micro-jets during their first inertial collapse and re-growth. After jetting, these rebounding bubbles could regain a spherical shape before undergoing a second inertial collapse. However, either upon this second inertial collapse, or sometimes upon the first inertial collapse, the rebounding bubble emerged from the collapse as a cloud of smaller bubbles rather than a single bubble. These daughter bubbles could continue to rebound and collapse for a few cycles, but did not coalesce. These observations show that the positive-pressure phase of SWs fragments preexisting bubbles but this initial fragmentation does not yield bubble proliferation, as the daughter bubbles coalesce to reform a single bubble. Instead, bubble proliferation is the product of the subsequent inertial collapses.

KW - Cavitation

KW - Cavitation nuclei

KW - High-speed photography

KW - Microbubbles

KW - Shock waves

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49149088191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49149088191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.2956259

DO - 10.1063/1.2956259

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:49149088191

SN - 9780735405448

VL - 1022

SP - 460

EP - 463

BT - AIP Conference Proceedings

ER -