Bypassing the local rural hospital for outpatient procedures

Charles Saunders, Gail R. Bellamy, Nir Menachemi, Askar S. Chukmaitov, Robert G. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the amount of local rural hospital outpatient department (HOPD) bypass for outpatient procedures. Methods: We analyzed data on colonoscopies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed in the state of Florida over the period 1997-2004. Findings: Approximately, 53% of colonoscopy and 45% of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy patients bypassed their local rural hospital for treatment at either a free-standing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) or a nonlocal hospital outpatient department. Independent predictors of bypass included risk-adjusted severity of the patient's medical condition, insurance status, and race. Patients treated in ASCs were predominately healthier, white and commercially insured. Nonlocal HOPDs tend to treat a sicker cohort of patients who were publicly insured or under managed care. Conclusions: The results indicate that patients who bypass their local HOPD to an ASC differ from those bypassing to a nonlocal HOPD, and that patient factors influencing bypass for outpatient procedures differ from those influencing inpatient bypass. From a policy perspective, as procedures continue to migrate from the inpatient to the outpatient setting, bypassing the local rural hospital for treatment elsewhere could create conditions that negatively impact rural hospital operations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-181
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Rural Health
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rural Hospitals
Outpatients
Hospital Departments
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Colonoscopy
Inpatients
Insurance Coverage
Managed Care Programs
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Bypassing the local rural hospital for outpatient procedures. / Saunders, Charles; Bellamy, Gail R.; Menachemi, Nir; Chukmaitov, Askar S.; Brooks, Robert G.

In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.03.2009, p. 174-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saunders, Charles ; Bellamy, Gail R. ; Menachemi, Nir ; Chukmaitov, Askar S. ; Brooks, Robert G. / Bypassing the local rural hospital for outpatient procedures. In: Journal of Rural Health. 2009 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 174-181.
@article{e2d5dcb9c6fe4c148e5d401bbef02b55,
title = "Bypassing the local rural hospital for outpatient procedures",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the amount of local rural hospital outpatient department (HOPD) bypass for outpatient procedures. Methods: We analyzed data on colonoscopies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed in the state of Florida over the period 1997-2004. Findings: Approximately, 53{\%} of colonoscopy and 45{\%} of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy patients bypassed their local rural hospital for treatment at either a free-standing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) or a nonlocal hospital outpatient department. Independent predictors of bypass included risk-adjusted severity of the patient's medical condition, insurance status, and race. Patients treated in ASCs were predominately healthier, white and commercially insured. Nonlocal HOPDs tend to treat a sicker cohort of patients who were publicly insured or under managed care. Conclusions: The results indicate that patients who bypass their local HOPD to an ASC differ from those bypassing to a nonlocal HOPD, and that patient factors influencing bypass for outpatient procedures differ from those influencing inpatient bypass. From a policy perspective, as procedures continue to migrate from the inpatient to the outpatient setting, bypassing the local rural hospital for treatment elsewhere could create conditions that negatively impact rural hospital operations.",
author = "Charles Saunders and Bellamy, {Gail R.} and Nir Menachemi and Chukmaitov, {Askar S.} and Brooks, {Robert G.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00214.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "174--181",
journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "0890-765X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bypassing the local rural hospital for outpatient procedures

AU - Saunders, Charles

AU - Bellamy, Gail R.

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Chukmaitov, Askar S.

AU - Brooks, Robert G.

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the amount of local rural hospital outpatient department (HOPD) bypass for outpatient procedures. Methods: We analyzed data on colonoscopies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed in the state of Florida over the period 1997-2004. Findings: Approximately, 53% of colonoscopy and 45% of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy patients bypassed their local rural hospital for treatment at either a free-standing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) or a nonlocal hospital outpatient department. Independent predictors of bypass included risk-adjusted severity of the patient's medical condition, insurance status, and race. Patients treated in ASCs were predominately healthier, white and commercially insured. Nonlocal HOPDs tend to treat a sicker cohort of patients who were publicly insured or under managed care. Conclusions: The results indicate that patients who bypass their local HOPD to an ASC differ from those bypassing to a nonlocal HOPD, and that patient factors influencing bypass for outpatient procedures differ from those influencing inpatient bypass. From a policy perspective, as procedures continue to migrate from the inpatient to the outpatient setting, bypassing the local rural hospital for treatment elsewhere could create conditions that negatively impact rural hospital operations.

AB - Purpose: To assess the amount of local rural hospital outpatient department (HOPD) bypass for outpatient procedures. Methods: We analyzed data on colonoscopies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed in the state of Florida over the period 1997-2004. Findings: Approximately, 53% of colonoscopy and 45% of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy patients bypassed their local rural hospital for treatment at either a free-standing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) or a nonlocal hospital outpatient department. Independent predictors of bypass included risk-adjusted severity of the patient's medical condition, insurance status, and race. Patients treated in ASCs were predominately healthier, white and commercially insured. Nonlocal HOPDs tend to treat a sicker cohort of patients who were publicly insured or under managed care. Conclusions: The results indicate that patients who bypass their local HOPD to an ASC differ from those bypassing to a nonlocal HOPD, and that patient factors influencing bypass for outpatient procedures differ from those influencing inpatient bypass. From a policy perspective, as procedures continue to migrate from the inpatient to the outpatient setting, bypassing the local rural hospital for treatment elsewhere could create conditions that negatively impact rural hospital operations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350151232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350151232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00214.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00214.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19785583

AN - SCOPUS:70350151232

VL - 25

SP - 174

EP - 181

JO - Journal of Rural Health

JF - Journal of Rural Health

SN - 0890-765X

IS - 2

ER -