Can emergency medicine practitioners predict disposition of psychiatric patients based on a brief medical evaluation?

Michael J. Drescher, Frances Russell, Maryanne Pappas, David A. Pepper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) often provide 'medical clearance' before evaluation by a psychiatry practitioner (PP). We set out to determine the level of agreement between EMP impression and disposition as determined by PPs. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational study in an urban tertiary teaching hospital emergency department. We collected data from February to April 2011. We used a convenience sample of patient encounters evaluated by EMPs and subsequent referral for psychiatric evaluation. We asked EMPs whether they thought the patients would be admitted or discharged following psychiatric evaluation, and if discharged, whether to outpatient psychiatric follow-up or to no follow-up. EMPs were asked to base their opinion upon their general impression following their brief medical evaluation. They were not given guidelines on which to base their decision. The EMPs were blind to PP decisions. The κ-statistic was used to calculate agreement between the EMP's impression and disposition decision by the PP. We excluded patients who were acutely intoxicated, in police custody, or lived in an extended care facility. Results We included 156 patient encounters over the study period and had complete data for 152 encounters. Of these, 86 (55%) were admitted, 46 (30%) were discharged with no specific psychiatric follow-up, and 20 (13%) were discharged with a follow-up plan. EMPs predicted the exact disposition in 77/152 (51%) cases (κ=0.264, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.333). Agreement was higher for admitted patients, with EMPs predicting inpatient admission for 57/86 (66%) of these patients. Other factors associated with higher agreement scores were years in emergency medicine practice by the EMP and suicidal ideation by the patient. Conclusion EMPs did not reliably predict psychiatric disposition decisions based on clinical 'gestalt'. Future research will focus on clinical guidelines to help EMPs better independently assess need for emergency psychiatric services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-191
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Psychiatry
Psychiatric Emergency Services
Guidelines
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Suicidal Ideation
Urban Hospitals
Hospital Departments
Police
Tertiary Care Centers
Teaching Hospitals
Observational Studies
Hospital Emergency Service
Inpatients
Outpatients
Referral and Consultation
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • adults
  • behavioral emergencies
  • diagnosis
  • disposition
  • emergency medicine
  • psychiatric emergencies
  • psychiatry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Can emergency medicine practitioners predict disposition of psychiatric patients based on a brief medical evaluation? / Drescher, Michael J.; Russell, Frances; Pappas, Maryanne; Pepper, David A.

In: European Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.12.2015, p. 188-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fc0bbecb69f4286a6816236f01603ac,
title = "Can emergency medicine practitioners predict disposition of psychiatric patients based on a brief medical evaluation?",
abstract = "Objective Emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) often provide 'medical clearance' before evaluation by a psychiatry practitioner (PP). We set out to determine the level of agreement between EMP impression and disposition as determined by PPs. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational study in an urban tertiary teaching hospital emergency department. We collected data from February to April 2011. We used a convenience sample of patient encounters evaluated by EMPs and subsequent referral for psychiatric evaluation. We asked EMPs whether they thought the patients would be admitted or discharged following psychiatric evaluation, and if discharged, whether to outpatient psychiatric follow-up or to no follow-up. EMPs were asked to base their opinion upon their general impression following their brief medical evaluation. They were not given guidelines on which to base their decision. The EMPs were blind to PP decisions. The κ-statistic was used to calculate agreement between the EMP's impression and disposition decision by the PP. We excluded patients who were acutely intoxicated, in police custody, or lived in an extended care facility. Results We included 156 patient encounters over the study period and had complete data for 152 encounters. Of these, 86 (55{\%}) were admitted, 46 (30{\%}) were discharged with no specific psychiatric follow-up, and 20 (13{\%}) were discharged with a follow-up plan. EMPs predicted the exact disposition in 77/152 (51{\%}) cases (κ=0.264, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.77-0.333). Agreement was higher for admitted patients, with EMPs predicting inpatient admission for 57/86 (66{\%}) of these patients. Other factors associated with higher agreement scores were years in emergency medicine practice by the EMP and suicidal ideation by the patient. Conclusion EMPs did not reliably predict psychiatric disposition decisions based on clinical 'gestalt'. Future research will focus on clinical guidelines to help EMPs better independently assess need for emergency psychiatric services.",
keywords = "adults, behavioral emergencies, diagnosis, disposition, emergency medicine, psychiatric emergencies, psychiatry",
author = "Drescher, {Michael J.} and Frances Russell and Maryanne Pappas and Pepper, {David A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000131",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "188--191",
journal = "European Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0969-9546",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can emergency medicine practitioners predict disposition of psychiatric patients based on a brief medical evaluation?

AU - Drescher, Michael J.

AU - Russell, Frances

AU - Pappas, Maryanne

AU - Pepper, David A.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Objective Emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) often provide 'medical clearance' before evaluation by a psychiatry practitioner (PP). We set out to determine the level of agreement between EMP impression and disposition as determined by PPs. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational study in an urban tertiary teaching hospital emergency department. We collected data from February to April 2011. We used a convenience sample of patient encounters evaluated by EMPs and subsequent referral for psychiatric evaluation. We asked EMPs whether they thought the patients would be admitted or discharged following psychiatric evaluation, and if discharged, whether to outpatient psychiatric follow-up or to no follow-up. EMPs were asked to base their opinion upon their general impression following their brief medical evaluation. They were not given guidelines on which to base their decision. The EMPs were blind to PP decisions. The κ-statistic was used to calculate agreement between the EMP's impression and disposition decision by the PP. We excluded patients who were acutely intoxicated, in police custody, or lived in an extended care facility. Results We included 156 patient encounters over the study period and had complete data for 152 encounters. Of these, 86 (55%) were admitted, 46 (30%) were discharged with no specific psychiatric follow-up, and 20 (13%) were discharged with a follow-up plan. EMPs predicted the exact disposition in 77/152 (51%) cases (κ=0.264, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.333). Agreement was higher for admitted patients, with EMPs predicting inpatient admission for 57/86 (66%) of these patients. Other factors associated with higher agreement scores were years in emergency medicine practice by the EMP and suicidal ideation by the patient. Conclusion EMPs did not reliably predict psychiatric disposition decisions based on clinical 'gestalt'. Future research will focus on clinical guidelines to help EMPs better independently assess need for emergency psychiatric services.

AB - Objective Emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) often provide 'medical clearance' before evaluation by a psychiatry practitioner (PP). We set out to determine the level of agreement between EMP impression and disposition as determined by PPs. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational study in an urban tertiary teaching hospital emergency department. We collected data from February to April 2011. We used a convenience sample of patient encounters evaluated by EMPs and subsequent referral for psychiatric evaluation. We asked EMPs whether they thought the patients would be admitted or discharged following psychiatric evaluation, and if discharged, whether to outpatient psychiatric follow-up or to no follow-up. EMPs were asked to base their opinion upon their general impression following their brief medical evaluation. They were not given guidelines on which to base their decision. The EMPs were blind to PP decisions. The κ-statistic was used to calculate agreement between the EMP's impression and disposition decision by the PP. We excluded patients who were acutely intoxicated, in police custody, or lived in an extended care facility. Results We included 156 patient encounters over the study period and had complete data for 152 encounters. Of these, 86 (55%) were admitted, 46 (30%) were discharged with no specific psychiatric follow-up, and 20 (13%) were discharged with a follow-up plan. EMPs predicted the exact disposition in 77/152 (51%) cases (κ=0.264, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.333). Agreement was higher for admitted patients, with EMPs predicting inpatient admission for 57/86 (66%) of these patients. Other factors associated with higher agreement scores were years in emergency medicine practice by the EMP and suicidal ideation by the patient. Conclusion EMPs did not reliably predict psychiatric disposition decisions based on clinical 'gestalt'. Future research will focus on clinical guidelines to help EMPs better independently assess need for emergency psychiatric services.

KW - adults

KW - behavioral emergencies

KW - diagnosis

KW - disposition

KW - emergency medicine

KW - psychiatric emergencies

KW - psychiatry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957437210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957437210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000131

DO - 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000131

M3 - Article

C2 - 24910963

AN - SCOPUS:84957437210

VL - 22

SP - 188

EP - 191

JO - European Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - European Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0969-9546

IS - 3

ER -