Can patients tell when they are unwanted? "Turfing" in residency training

Catherine V. Caldicott, Kathleen A. Dunn, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: When a physician believes that the troubles of caring for a patient outweigh the rewards, he or she can move - "turf", the unwanted patient from his or her own to another physician's territory. Physicians receiving such patients can feel burdened by, and resentful about, caring for those who are "turfed" to them by other physicians, yet little is known about the effects such "turf battles" have on patient care. This study aims to discover if "turfed" patients (TPs) experience their hospitalizations differently from patients whose admissions are perceived more favorably by their physicians. Design: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Population: Twenty Six English-speaking patients on a medical service in a tertiary care university hospital. Outcomes: Hospitalization experiences based on qualitative thematic analysis of interview audiotapes and transcripts. Results: The experience of patients perceived as "turfs" differed from patients deemed more appropriately admitted in two areas: mode of admission and tone of interview themes. TPs were admitted via the emergency department or intra-hospital transfer; unlike the "appropriate" patients (APs), none came from outside hospitals. Although patients in both groups voiced many similar themes, nearly all TP interview themes were unfavorable. AP interviewees, by comparison expressed both favorable and unfavorable themes. TPs were direct and explicit about their anger and frustration, while APs mixed humor with complaints. Conclusions: "Turfed" patients may have different care experiences from those of patients deemed appropriate for a medical service. Inter-specialty barriers to collegiality and relationship-centered care shape physicians' perceptions of patient appropriateness and desirability and merit further large-scale exploration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-111
Number of pages8
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Physicians
Interviews
Hospitalization
Tape Recording
Wit and Humor
Frustration
Patient Admission
Anger
Tertiary Healthcare
Reward

Keywords

  • Inter-professional relations
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Patient transfer
  • Physician-patient relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Can patients tell when they are unwanted? "Turfing" in residency training. / Caldicott, Catherine V.; Dunn, Kathleen A.; Frankel, Richard.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 104-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caldicott, Catherine V. ; Dunn, Kathleen A. ; Frankel, Richard. / Can patients tell when they are unwanted? "Turfing" in residency training. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2005 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 104-111.
@article{7e4a722b20b24ec8ab2a70ae47bb6a6b,
title = "Can patients tell when they are unwanted? {"}Turfing{"} in residency training",
abstract = "Objectives: When a physician believes that the troubles of caring for a patient outweigh the rewards, he or she can move - {"}turf{"}, the unwanted patient from his or her own to another physician's territory. Physicians receiving such patients can feel burdened by, and resentful about, caring for those who are {"}turfed{"} to them by other physicians, yet little is known about the effects such {"}turf battles{"} have on patient care. This study aims to discover if {"}turfed{"} patients (TPs) experience their hospitalizations differently from patients whose admissions are perceived more favorably by their physicians. Design: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Population: Twenty Six English-speaking patients on a medical service in a tertiary care university hospital. Outcomes: Hospitalization experiences based on qualitative thematic analysis of interview audiotapes and transcripts. Results: The experience of patients perceived as {"}turfs{"} differed from patients deemed more appropriately admitted in two areas: mode of admission and tone of interview themes. TPs were admitted via the emergency department or intra-hospital transfer; unlike the {"}appropriate{"} patients (APs), none came from outside hospitals. Although patients in both groups voiced many similar themes, nearly all TP interview themes were unfavorable. AP interviewees, by comparison expressed both favorable and unfavorable themes. TPs were direct and explicit about their anger and frustration, while APs mixed humor with complaints. Conclusions: {"}Turfed{"} patients may have different care experiences from those of patients deemed appropriate for a medical service. Inter-specialty barriers to collegiality and relationship-centered care shape physicians' perceptions of patient appropriateness and desirability and merit further large-scale exploration.",
keywords = "Inter-professional relations, Patient satisfaction, Patient transfer, Physician-patient relations",
author = "Caldicott, {Catherine V.} and Dunn, {Kathleen A.} and Richard Frankel",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.014",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "104--111",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can patients tell when they are unwanted? "Turfing" in residency training

AU - Caldicott, Catherine V.

AU - Dunn, Kathleen A.

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Objectives: When a physician believes that the troubles of caring for a patient outweigh the rewards, he or she can move - "turf", the unwanted patient from his or her own to another physician's territory. Physicians receiving such patients can feel burdened by, and resentful about, caring for those who are "turfed" to them by other physicians, yet little is known about the effects such "turf battles" have on patient care. This study aims to discover if "turfed" patients (TPs) experience their hospitalizations differently from patients whose admissions are perceived more favorably by their physicians. Design: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Population: Twenty Six English-speaking patients on a medical service in a tertiary care university hospital. Outcomes: Hospitalization experiences based on qualitative thematic analysis of interview audiotapes and transcripts. Results: The experience of patients perceived as "turfs" differed from patients deemed more appropriately admitted in two areas: mode of admission and tone of interview themes. TPs were admitted via the emergency department or intra-hospital transfer; unlike the "appropriate" patients (APs), none came from outside hospitals. Although patients in both groups voiced many similar themes, nearly all TP interview themes were unfavorable. AP interviewees, by comparison expressed both favorable and unfavorable themes. TPs were direct and explicit about their anger and frustration, while APs mixed humor with complaints. Conclusions: "Turfed" patients may have different care experiences from those of patients deemed appropriate for a medical service. Inter-specialty barriers to collegiality and relationship-centered care shape physicians' perceptions of patient appropriateness and desirability and merit further large-scale exploration.

AB - Objectives: When a physician believes that the troubles of caring for a patient outweigh the rewards, he or she can move - "turf", the unwanted patient from his or her own to another physician's territory. Physicians receiving such patients can feel burdened by, and resentful about, caring for those who are "turfed" to them by other physicians, yet little is known about the effects such "turf battles" have on patient care. This study aims to discover if "turfed" patients (TPs) experience their hospitalizations differently from patients whose admissions are perceived more favorably by their physicians. Design: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Population: Twenty Six English-speaking patients on a medical service in a tertiary care university hospital. Outcomes: Hospitalization experiences based on qualitative thematic analysis of interview audiotapes and transcripts. Results: The experience of patients perceived as "turfs" differed from patients deemed more appropriately admitted in two areas: mode of admission and tone of interview themes. TPs were admitted via the emergency department or intra-hospital transfer; unlike the "appropriate" patients (APs), none came from outside hospitals. Although patients in both groups voiced many similar themes, nearly all TP interview themes were unfavorable. AP interviewees, by comparison expressed both favorable and unfavorable themes. TPs were direct and explicit about their anger and frustration, while APs mixed humor with complaints. Conclusions: "Turfed" patients may have different care experiences from those of patients deemed appropriate for a medical service. Inter-specialty barriers to collegiality and relationship-centered care shape physicians' perceptions of patient appropriateness and desirability and merit further large-scale exploration.

KW - Inter-professional relations

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Patient transfer

KW - Physician-patient relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044287204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044287204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.014

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 104

EP - 111

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -