Can we trust depression screening instruments in healthy 'old-old' adults?

Lea C. Watson, Carmen L. Lewis, Christine E. Kistler, Halle R. Amick, Malaz Boustani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Despite a growing understanding of late-life depression, few studies focus on the old-old, those 75 years and over. We wished to characterize depressive symptoms and determine the accuracy of two common screening instruments for major and minor depression in a population of old-old retirees. Methods. Participants lived independently in one of two Continuing Care Retirement Communities and volunteered for an in-home interview about cancer screening attitudes. As part of this baseline interview, they were screened with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Center for Epidemiologic Stuies-Depression (CES-D) scale. Those agreeing to a second interview received an evaluation using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV), performed by a geriatric psychiatrist within two weeks of the initial interview. Results. In an educated and cognitively intact group of retirees averaging 80 years of age, the GDS and CES-D performed poorly using standard cutpoints in detecting both major (sensitivity 60% for both) and minor (sensitivity 33% and 50%, respectively) depression. One in five participants had significant depression as confirmed by SCID-IV evaluation. Twelve percent had major depression and 7% had minor depression. Most participants had their first episode of either after age 60. Conclusions. Contrary to most studies evaluating the GDS and CES-D for accuracy in detecting late-life depression, these instruments at standard cutpoints performed poorly in this group of healthy older adults. The healthy old-old may require novel screening interventions to detect clinically significant depression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-285
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Depression
Interviews
Geriatrics
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Retirement
Early Detection of Cancer
Psychiatry

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Late-life
  • Old-old
  • Screening instruments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Can we trust depression screening instruments in healthy 'old-old' adults? / Watson, Lea C.; Lewis, Carmen L.; Kistler, Christine E.; Amick, Halle R.; Boustani, Malaz.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 19, No. 3, 03.2004, p. 278-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Watson, Lea C. ; Lewis, Carmen L. ; Kistler, Christine E. ; Amick, Halle R. ; Boustani, Malaz. / Can we trust depression screening instruments in healthy 'old-old' adults?. In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 278-285.
@article{3ccd5fd605e543e8b5b4f75802e93125,
title = "Can we trust depression screening instruments in healthy 'old-old' adults?",
abstract = "Objective. Despite a growing understanding of late-life depression, few studies focus on the old-old, those 75 years and over. We wished to characterize depressive symptoms and determine the accuracy of two common screening instruments for major and minor depression in a population of old-old retirees. Methods. Participants lived independently in one of two Continuing Care Retirement Communities and volunteered for an in-home interview about cancer screening attitudes. As part of this baseline interview, they were screened with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Center for Epidemiologic Stuies-Depression (CES-D) scale. Those agreeing to a second interview received an evaluation using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV), performed by a geriatric psychiatrist within two weeks of the initial interview. Results. In an educated and cognitively intact group of retirees averaging 80 years of age, the GDS and CES-D performed poorly using standard cutpoints in detecting both major (sensitivity 60{\%} for both) and minor (sensitivity 33{\%} and 50{\%}, respectively) depression. One in five participants had significant depression as confirmed by SCID-IV evaluation. Twelve percent had major depression and 7{\%} had minor depression. Most participants had their first episode of either after age 60. Conclusions. Contrary to most studies evaluating the GDS and CES-D for accuracy in detecting late-life depression, these instruments at standard cutpoints performed poorly in this group of healthy older adults. The healthy old-old may require novel screening interventions to detect clinically significant depression.",
keywords = "Depression, Late-life, Old-old, Screening instruments",
author = "Watson, {Lea C.} and Lewis, {Carmen L.} and Kistler, {Christine E.} and Amick, {Halle R.} and Malaz Boustani",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/gps.1082",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "278--285",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we trust depression screening instruments in healthy 'old-old' adults?

AU - Watson, Lea C.

AU - Lewis, Carmen L.

AU - Kistler, Christine E.

AU - Amick, Halle R.

AU - Boustani, Malaz

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - Objective. Despite a growing understanding of late-life depression, few studies focus on the old-old, those 75 years and over. We wished to characterize depressive symptoms and determine the accuracy of two common screening instruments for major and minor depression in a population of old-old retirees. Methods. Participants lived independently in one of two Continuing Care Retirement Communities and volunteered for an in-home interview about cancer screening attitudes. As part of this baseline interview, they were screened with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Center for Epidemiologic Stuies-Depression (CES-D) scale. Those agreeing to a second interview received an evaluation using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV), performed by a geriatric psychiatrist within two weeks of the initial interview. Results. In an educated and cognitively intact group of retirees averaging 80 years of age, the GDS and CES-D performed poorly using standard cutpoints in detecting both major (sensitivity 60% for both) and minor (sensitivity 33% and 50%, respectively) depression. One in five participants had significant depression as confirmed by SCID-IV evaluation. Twelve percent had major depression and 7% had minor depression. Most participants had their first episode of either after age 60. Conclusions. Contrary to most studies evaluating the GDS and CES-D for accuracy in detecting late-life depression, these instruments at standard cutpoints performed poorly in this group of healthy older adults. The healthy old-old may require novel screening interventions to detect clinically significant depression.

AB - Objective. Despite a growing understanding of late-life depression, few studies focus on the old-old, those 75 years and over. We wished to characterize depressive symptoms and determine the accuracy of two common screening instruments for major and minor depression in a population of old-old retirees. Methods. Participants lived independently in one of two Continuing Care Retirement Communities and volunteered for an in-home interview about cancer screening attitudes. As part of this baseline interview, they were screened with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Center for Epidemiologic Stuies-Depression (CES-D) scale. Those agreeing to a second interview received an evaluation using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV), performed by a geriatric psychiatrist within two weeks of the initial interview. Results. In an educated and cognitively intact group of retirees averaging 80 years of age, the GDS and CES-D performed poorly using standard cutpoints in detecting both major (sensitivity 60% for both) and minor (sensitivity 33% and 50%, respectively) depression. One in five participants had significant depression as confirmed by SCID-IV evaluation. Twelve percent had major depression and 7% had minor depression. Most participants had their first episode of either after age 60. Conclusions. Contrary to most studies evaluating the GDS and CES-D for accuracy in detecting late-life depression, these instruments at standard cutpoints performed poorly in this group of healthy older adults. The healthy old-old may require novel screening interventions to detect clinically significant depression.

KW - Depression

KW - Late-life

KW - Old-old

KW - Screening instruments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642568813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642568813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.1082

DO - 10.1002/gps.1082

M3 - Article

C2 - 15027044

AN - SCOPUS:1642568813

VL - 19

SP - 278

EP - 285

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

IS - 3

ER -