Cancer Care Coordination

a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 30 Years of Empirical Studies

Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, David Haggstrom, Paul K.J. Han, Kathleen M. Fairfield, Paul Krebs, Steven B. Clauser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: According to a landmark study by the Institute of Medicine, patients with cancer often receive poorly coordinated care in multiple settings from many providers. Lack of coordination is associated with poor symptom control, medical errors, and higher costs. Purpose: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (1) synthesize the findings of studies addressing cancer care coordination, (2) describe study outcomes across the cancer continuum, and (3) obtain a quantitative estimate of the effect of interventions in cancer care coordination on service system processes and patient health outcomes. Methods: Of 1241 abstracts identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Each study had US or Canadian participants, comparison or control groups, measures, times, samples, and/or interventions. Two researchers independently applied a standardized search strategy, coding scheme, and online coding program to each study. Eleven studies met the additional criteria for the meta-analysis; a random effects estimation model was used for data analysis. Results: Cancer care coordination approaches led to improvements in 81 % of outcomes, including screening, measures of patient experience with care, and quality of end-of-life care. Across the continuum of cancer care, patient navigation was the most frequent care coordination intervention, followed by home telehealth; nurse case management was third in frequency. The meta-analysis of a subset of the reviewed studies showed that the odds of appropriate health care utilization in cancer care coordination interventions were almost twice (OR = 1.9, 95 % CI = 1.5–3.5) that of comparison interventions. Conclusions: This review offers promising findings on the impact of cancer care coordination on increasing value and reducing healthcare costs in the USA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-546
Number of pages15
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Neoplasms
Patient Navigation
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Medical Errors
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Continuity of Patient Care
Terminal Care
Telemedicine
Case Management
Ataxia
MEDLINE
Health Care Costs
Libraries
Nurses
Quality of Life
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Costs and Cost Analysis
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Care coordination
  • Continuity of patient care
  • Health care coordination
  • Interdisciplinary communication
  • Neoplasms
  • Patient navigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Cancer Care Coordination : a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 30 Years of Empirical Studies. / Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld; Haggstrom, David; Han, Paul K.J.; Fairfield, Kathleen M.; Krebs, Paul; Clauser, Steven B.

In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 532-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld ; Haggstrom, David ; Han, Paul K.J. ; Fairfield, Kathleen M. ; Krebs, Paul ; Clauser, Steven B. / Cancer Care Coordination : a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 30 Years of Empirical Studies. In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 51, No. 4. pp. 532-546.
@article{003653a80899487b961f61f911bca40c,
title = "Cancer Care Coordination: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 30 Years of Empirical Studies",
abstract = "Background: According to a landmark study by the Institute of Medicine, patients with cancer often receive poorly coordinated care in multiple settings from many providers. Lack of coordination is associated with poor symptom control, medical errors, and higher costs. Purpose: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (1) synthesize the findings of studies addressing cancer care coordination, (2) describe study outcomes across the cancer continuum, and (3) obtain a quantitative estimate of the effect of interventions in cancer care coordination on service system processes and patient health outcomes. Methods: Of 1241 abstracts identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Each study had US or Canadian participants, comparison or control groups, measures, times, samples, and/or interventions. Two researchers independently applied a standardized search strategy, coding scheme, and online coding program to each study. Eleven studies met the additional criteria for the meta-analysis; a random effects estimation model was used for data analysis. Results: Cancer care coordination approaches led to improvements in 81 {\%} of outcomes, including screening, measures of patient experience with care, and quality of end-of-life care. Across the continuum of cancer care, patient navigation was the most frequent care coordination intervention, followed by home telehealth; nurse case management was third in frequency. The meta-analysis of a subset of the reviewed studies showed that the odds of appropriate health care utilization in cancer care coordination interventions were almost twice (OR = 1.9, 95 {\%} CI = 1.5–3.5) that of comparison interventions. Conclusions: This review offers promising findings on the impact of cancer care coordination on increasing value and reducing healthcare costs in the USA.",
keywords = "Cancer, Care coordination, Continuity of patient care, Health care coordination, Interdisciplinary communication, Neoplasms, Patient navigation",
author = "Gorin, {Sherri Sheinfeld} and David Haggstrom and Han, {Paul K.J.} and Fairfield, {Kathleen M.} and Paul Krebs and Clauser, {Steven B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12160-017-9876-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "532--546",
journal = "Annals of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0883-6612",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cancer Care Coordination

T2 - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 30 Years of Empirical Studies

AU - Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld

AU - Haggstrom, David

AU - Han, Paul K.J.

AU - Fairfield, Kathleen M.

AU - Krebs, Paul

AU - Clauser, Steven B.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background: According to a landmark study by the Institute of Medicine, patients with cancer often receive poorly coordinated care in multiple settings from many providers. Lack of coordination is associated with poor symptom control, medical errors, and higher costs. Purpose: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (1) synthesize the findings of studies addressing cancer care coordination, (2) describe study outcomes across the cancer continuum, and (3) obtain a quantitative estimate of the effect of interventions in cancer care coordination on service system processes and patient health outcomes. Methods: Of 1241 abstracts identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Each study had US or Canadian participants, comparison or control groups, measures, times, samples, and/or interventions. Two researchers independently applied a standardized search strategy, coding scheme, and online coding program to each study. Eleven studies met the additional criteria for the meta-analysis; a random effects estimation model was used for data analysis. Results: Cancer care coordination approaches led to improvements in 81 % of outcomes, including screening, measures of patient experience with care, and quality of end-of-life care. Across the continuum of cancer care, patient navigation was the most frequent care coordination intervention, followed by home telehealth; nurse case management was third in frequency. The meta-analysis of a subset of the reviewed studies showed that the odds of appropriate health care utilization in cancer care coordination interventions were almost twice (OR = 1.9, 95 % CI = 1.5–3.5) that of comparison interventions. Conclusions: This review offers promising findings on the impact of cancer care coordination on increasing value and reducing healthcare costs in the USA.

AB - Background: According to a landmark study by the Institute of Medicine, patients with cancer often receive poorly coordinated care in multiple settings from many providers. Lack of coordination is associated with poor symptom control, medical errors, and higher costs. Purpose: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (1) synthesize the findings of studies addressing cancer care coordination, (2) describe study outcomes across the cancer continuum, and (3) obtain a quantitative estimate of the effect of interventions in cancer care coordination on service system processes and patient health outcomes. Methods: Of 1241 abstracts identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Each study had US or Canadian participants, comparison or control groups, measures, times, samples, and/or interventions. Two researchers independently applied a standardized search strategy, coding scheme, and online coding program to each study. Eleven studies met the additional criteria for the meta-analysis; a random effects estimation model was used for data analysis. Results: Cancer care coordination approaches led to improvements in 81 % of outcomes, including screening, measures of patient experience with care, and quality of end-of-life care. Across the continuum of cancer care, patient navigation was the most frequent care coordination intervention, followed by home telehealth; nurse case management was third in frequency. The meta-analysis of a subset of the reviewed studies showed that the odds of appropriate health care utilization in cancer care coordination interventions were almost twice (OR = 1.9, 95 % CI = 1.5–3.5) that of comparison interventions. Conclusions: This review offers promising findings on the impact of cancer care coordination on increasing value and reducing healthcare costs in the USA.

KW - Cancer

KW - Care coordination

KW - Continuity of patient care

KW - Health care coordination

KW - Interdisciplinary communication

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Patient navigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022056517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022056517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12160-017-9876-2

DO - 10.1007/s12160-017-9876-2

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 532

EP - 546

JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0883-6612

IS - 4

ER -