Cecal Insertion and Withdrawal Times With Wide-Angle Versus Standard Colonoscopes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Hala Fatima, Douglas K. Rex, Richard Rothstein, Emad Rahmani, Omar Nehme, John Dewitt, Debra Helper, Arifa Toor, Steven Bensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background & Aims: The aim of this study was to see if a 170° angle of view (wide angle [WA]) colonoscope allowed faster withdrawal without decreasing adenoma detection. Methods: Eight colonoscopists at 2 institutions participated in the study. Patients were randomized so that each colonoscopist performed 50% of the exams with a 160 series (140° angle of view; standard [ST]) colonoscope and 50% with a prototype 160 series colonoscope with a 170° angle of view (WA instrument). Insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected were recorded. Endoscopists were asked to withdraw as quickly as they could carefully complete the exams. Analysis of variance was done to compare insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected. Time to perform biopsy, polypectomy, and cleaning was subtracted using a stopwatch. Results: A total of 710 procedures were performed, 355 with ST and 355 with WA colonoscope. The mean insertion time was similar. The mean withdrawal time (absent time for suctioning, washing, etc.) with the WA colonoscope was 4.9 min which was shorter (4.9 vs 5.4 min; P = .0001) overall and for three individual endocopists (P = .0001, P = .01, and P = .03). There was no difference in the mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy with ST (0.6) compared to WA (0.5) (P = .12). Two of the three endoscopists with shorter withdrawal times with WA had numerically higher detection rates with WA. Conclusions: The WA colonoscope is associated with a reduction in withdrawal time without compromising adenoma detection. However, this effect is operator dependent and the overall impact of wide-angle optics in this study was minor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-114
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Colonoscopes
Randomized Controlled Trials
Adenoma
Polyps
Colonoscopy
Analysis of Variance
Biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Cecal Insertion and Withdrawal Times With Wide-Angle Versus Standard Colonoscopes : A Randomized Controlled Trial. / Fatima, Hala; Rex, Douglas K.; Rothstein, Richard; Rahmani, Emad; Nehme, Omar; Dewitt, John; Helper, Debra; Toor, Arifa; Bensen, Steven.

In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 109-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fatima, Hala ; Rex, Douglas K. ; Rothstein, Richard ; Rahmani, Emad ; Nehme, Omar ; Dewitt, John ; Helper, Debra ; Toor, Arifa ; Bensen, Steven. / Cecal Insertion and Withdrawal Times With Wide-Angle Versus Standard Colonoscopes : A Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2008 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 109-114.
@article{a4da8aabec7047c5b3c7e40193c18645,
title = "Cecal Insertion and Withdrawal Times With Wide-Angle Versus Standard Colonoscopes: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background & Aims: The aim of this study was to see if a 170° angle of view (wide angle [WA]) colonoscope allowed faster withdrawal without decreasing adenoma detection. Methods: Eight colonoscopists at 2 institutions participated in the study. Patients were randomized so that each colonoscopist performed 50{\%} of the exams with a 160 series (140° angle of view; standard [ST]) colonoscope and 50{\%} with a prototype 160 series colonoscope with a 170° angle of view (WA instrument). Insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected were recorded. Endoscopists were asked to withdraw as quickly as they could carefully complete the exams. Analysis of variance was done to compare insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected. Time to perform biopsy, polypectomy, and cleaning was subtracted using a stopwatch. Results: A total of 710 procedures were performed, 355 with ST and 355 with WA colonoscope. The mean insertion time was similar. The mean withdrawal time (absent time for suctioning, washing, etc.) with the WA colonoscope was 4.9 min which was shorter (4.9 vs 5.4 min; P = .0001) overall and for three individual endocopists (P = .0001, P = .01, and P = .03). There was no difference in the mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy with ST (0.6) compared to WA (0.5) (P = .12). Two of the three endoscopists with shorter withdrawal times with WA had numerically higher detection rates with WA. Conclusions: The WA colonoscope is associated with a reduction in withdrawal time without compromising adenoma detection. However, this effect is operator dependent and the overall impact of wide-angle optics in this study was minor.",
author = "Hala Fatima and Rex, {Douglas K.} and Richard Rothstein and Emad Rahmani and Omar Nehme and John Dewitt and Debra Helper and Arifa Toor and Steven Bensen",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "109--114",
journal = "Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "1542-3565",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cecal Insertion and Withdrawal Times With Wide-Angle Versus Standard Colonoscopes

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Fatima, Hala

AU - Rex, Douglas K.

AU - Rothstein, Richard

AU - Rahmani, Emad

AU - Nehme, Omar

AU - Dewitt, John

AU - Helper, Debra

AU - Toor, Arifa

AU - Bensen, Steven

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Background & Aims: The aim of this study was to see if a 170° angle of view (wide angle [WA]) colonoscope allowed faster withdrawal without decreasing adenoma detection. Methods: Eight colonoscopists at 2 institutions participated in the study. Patients were randomized so that each colonoscopist performed 50% of the exams with a 160 series (140° angle of view; standard [ST]) colonoscope and 50% with a prototype 160 series colonoscope with a 170° angle of view (WA instrument). Insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected were recorded. Endoscopists were asked to withdraw as quickly as they could carefully complete the exams. Analysis of variance was done to compare insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected. Time to perform biopsy, polypectomy, and cleaning was subtracted using a stopwatch. Results: A total of 710 procedures were performed, 355 with ST and 355 with WA colonoscope. The mean insertion time was similar. The mean withdrawal time (absent time for suctioning, washing, etc.) with the WA colonoscope was 4.9 min which was shorter (4.9 vs 5.4 min; P = .0001) overall and for three individual endocopists (P = .0001, P = .01, and P = .03). There was no difference in the mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy with ST (0.6) compared to WA (0.5) (P = .12). Two of the three endoscopists with shorter withdrawal times with WA had numerically higher detection rates with WA. Conclusions: The WA colonoscope is associated with a reduction in withdrawal time without compromising adenoma detection. However, this effect is operator dependent and the overall impact of wide-angle optics in this study was minor.

AB - Background & Aims: The aim of this study was to see if a 170° angle of view (wide angle [WA]) colonoscope allowed faster withdrawal without decreasing adenoma detection. Methods: Eight colonoscopists at 2 institutions participated in the study. Patients were randomized so that each colonoscopist performed 50% of the exams with a 160 series (140° angle of view; standard [ST]) colonoscope and 50% with a prototype 160 series colonoscope with a 170° angle of view (WA instrument). Insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected were recorded. Endoscopists were asked to withdraw as quickly as they could carefully complete the exams. Analysis of variance was done to compare insertion and withdrawal times and number of polyps detected. Time to perform biopsy, polypectomy, and cleaning was subtracted using a stopwatch. Results: A total of 710 procedures were performed, 355 with ST and 355 with WA colonoscope. The mean insertion time was similar. The mean withdrawal time (absent time for suctioning, washing, etc.) with the WA colonoscope was 4.9 min which was shorter (4.9 vs 5.4 min; P = .0001) overall and for three individual endocopists (P = .0001, P = .01, and P = .03). There was no difference in the mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy with ST (0.6) compared to WA (0.5) (P = .12). Two of the three endoscopists with shorter withdrawal times with WA had numerically higher detection rates with WA. Conclusions: The WA colonoscope is associated with a reduction in withdrawal time without compromising adenoma detection. However, this effect is operator dependent and the overall impact of wide-angle optics in this study was minor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37449021269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37449021269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 18065277

AN - SCOPUS:37449021269

VL - 6

SP - 109

EP - 114

JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 1542-3565

IS - 1

ER -