Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental class II, division 1 malocclusion

M. Özgür Sayin, Hakan Turkkahraman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies evaluating maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental positions and the vertical components of Class II patients have reported conflicting results. In addition, no common results have been found regarding cranial base configurations. However, few studies have evaluated nongrowing subjects. The aim of this study was to establish whether patients with skeletal and dental Class II division 1 malocclusion have specific craniofacial features. For this, 40 non-growing females were evaluated cephalometrically. Wide variations were observed for almost all measurements of Class II division 1 patients. However, a posteriorly positioned and rotated mandible, protrusive mandibular incisors, and an increased cranial base angle were all mean characteristics of Class II division 1 patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-660
Number of pages5
JournalAngle Orthodontist
Volume75
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Angle Class II Malocclusion
Cephalometry
Tooth
Skull Base
Incisor
Mandible

Keywords

  • Cephalometric evaluation
  • Class II division 1 malocclusion
  • Nongrowing females

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental class II, division 1 malocclusion. / Sayin, M. Özgür; Turkkahraman, Hakan.

In: Angle Orthodontist, Vol. 75, No. 4, 01.07.2005, p. 656-660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c16130eac9045fd97063bbb41bea64a,
title = "Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental class II, division 1 malocclusion",
abstract = "Studies evaluating maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental positions and the vertical components of Class II patients have reported conflicting results. In addition, no common results have been found regarding cranial base configurations. However, few studies have evaluated nongrowing subjects. The aim of this study was to establish whether patients with skeletal and dental Class II division 1 malocclusion have specific craniofacial features. For this, 40 non-growing females were evaluated cephalometrically. Wide variations were observed for almost all measurements of Class II division 1 patients. However, a posteriorly positioned and rotated mandible, protrusive mandibular incisors, and an increased cranial base angle were all mean characteristics of Class II division 1 patients.",
keywords = "Cephalometric evaluation, Class II division 1 malocclusion, Nongrowing females",
author = "Sayin, {M. {\"O}zg{\"u}r} and Hakan Turkkahraman",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "656--660",
journal = "Angle Orthodontist",
issn = "0003-3219",
publisher = "E H Angle Orthodontists Research & Education Foundation, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental class II, division 1 malocclusion

AU - Sayin, M. Özgür

AU - Turkkahraman, Hakan

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - Studies evaluating maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental positions and the vertical components of Class II patients have reported conflicting results. In addition, no common results have been found regarding cranial base configurations. However, few studies have evaluated nongrowing subjects. The aim of this study was to establish whether patients with skeletal and dental Class II division 1 malocclusion have specific craniofacial features. For this, 40 non-growing females were evaluated cephalometrically. Wide variations were observed for almost all measurements of Class II division 1 patients. However, a posteriorly positioned and rotated mandible, protrusive mandibular incisors, and an increased cranial base angle were all mean characteristics of Class II division 1 patients.

AB - Studies evaluating maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental positions and the vertical components of Class II patients have reported conflicting results. In addition, no common results have been found regarding cranial base configurations. However, few studies have evaluated nongrowing subjects. The aim of this study was to establish whether patients with skeletal and dental Class II division 1 malocclusion have specific craniofacial features. For this, 40 non-growing females were evaluated cephalometrically. Wide variations were observed for almost all measurements of Class II division 1 patients. However, a posteriorly positioned and rotated mandible, protrusive mandibular incisors, and an increased cranial base angle were all mean characteristics of Class II division 1 patients.

KW - Cephalometric evaluation

KW - Class II division 1 malocclusion

KW - Nongrowing females

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21644453967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21644453967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 656

EP - 660

JO - Angle Orthodontist

JF - Angle Orthodontist

SN - 0003-3219

IS - 4

ER -