Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage: Comparison of two procedures

Jung S. Han, Vanchit John, Steven Blanchard, Michael Kowolik, George J. Eckert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in gingival dimensions and root coverage using the same surgical procedure but varying the amount of the connective tissue graft left uncovered. Methods: Twenty-five Class I or II recession defects in 20 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to test (exposed connective tissue group; E group) or control (fully covered connective tissue group; FC group) groups and treated with a connective tissue graft procedure. In the E group, 1 to 2 mm of the graft was left uncovered at the completion of the surgery, whereas the FC group had the graft completely covered by the flap. Clinical parameters assessed included probing depth, recession depth, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, mobility, and plaque score. Results: At 12 weeks, the mean root coverage percentages for FC and E groups were 93% and 88%, respectively. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.48). Complete root coverage was observed in 79% and 64% of the subjects in FC and E groups, respectively. There was greater increase in the width of keratinized tissue in the E group (1.5 ± 1.1 mm) than the FC group (0.9 ± 0.9 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.16). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for the changes in other parameters. Conclusions: Both procedures resulted in successful root coverage with an increase in the width of keratinized tissue. Leaving a portion of the graft exposed resulted in a greater increase of keratinized tissue, and complete coverage of the graft resulted in greater root coverage. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1346-1354
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume79
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Connective Tissue
Transplants
Healthy Volunteers
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Connective tissue
  • Gingival recession

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage : Comparison of two procedures. / Han, Jung S.; John, Vanchit; Blanchard, Steven; Kowolik, Michael; Eckert, George J.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 79, No. 8, 08.2008, p. 1346-1354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{14ee80368e4149c2a64440eb6daf5f23,
title = "Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage: Comparison of two procedures",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in gingival dimensions and root coverage using the same surgical procedure but varying the amount of the connective tissue graft left uncovered. Methods: Twenty-five Class I or II recession defects in 20 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to test (exposed connective tissue group; E group) or control (fully covered connective tissue group; FC group) groups and treated with a connective tissue graft procedure. In the E group, 1 to 2 mm of the graft was left uncovered at the completion of the surgery, whereas the FC group had the graft completely covered by the flap. Clinical parameters assessed included probing depth, recession depth, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, mobility, and plaque score. Results: At 12 weeks, the mean root coverage percentages for FC and E groups were 93{\%} and 88{\%}, respectively. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.48). Complete root coverage was observed in 79{\%} and 64{\%} of the subjects in FC and E groups, respectively. There was greater increase in the width of keratinized tissue in the E group (1.5 ± 1.1 mm) than the FC group (0.9 ± 0.9 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.16). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for the changes in other parameters. Conclusions: Both procedures resulted in successful root coverage with an increase in the width of keratinized tissue. Leaving a portion of the graft exposed resulted in a greater increase of keratinized tissue, and complete coverage of the graft resulted in greater root coverage. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.",
keywords = "Connective tissue, Gingival recession",
author = "Han, {Jung S.} and Vanchit John and Steven Blanchard and Michael Kowolik and Eckert, {George J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1902/jop.2008.070472",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1346--1354",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage

T2 - Comparison of two procedures

AU - Han, Jung S.

AU - John, Vanchit

AU - Blanchard, Steven

AU - Kowolik, Michael

AU - Eckert, George J.

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in gingival dimensions and root coverage using the same surgical procedure but varying the amount of the connective tissue graft left uncovered. Methods: Twenty-five Class I or II recession defects in 20 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to test (exposed connective tissue group; E group) or control (fully covered connective tissue group; FC group) groups and treated with a connective tissue graft procedure. In the E group, 1 to 2 mm of the graft was left uncovered at the completion of the surgery, whereas the FC group had the graft completely covered by the flap. Clinical parameters assessed included probing depth, recession depth, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, mobility, and plaque score. Results: At 12 weeks, the mean root coverage percentages for FC and E groups were 93% and 88%, respectively. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.48). Complete root coverage was observed in 79% and 64% of the subjects in FC and E groups, respectively. There was greater increase in the width of keratinized tissue in the E group (1.5 ± 1.1 mm) than the FC group (0.9 ± 0.9 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.16). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for the changes in other parameters. Conclusions: Both procedures resulted in successful root coverage with an increase in the width of keratinized tissue. Leaving a portion of the graft exposed resulted in a greater increase of keratinized tissue, and complete coverage of the graft resulted in greater root coverage. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in gingival dimensions and root coverage using the same surgical procedure but varying the amount of the connective tissue graft left uncovered. Methods: Twenty-five Class I or II recession defects in 20 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to test (exposed connective tissue group; E group) or control (fully covered connective tissue group; FC group) groups and treated with a connective tissue graft procedure. In the E group, 1 to 2 mm of the graft was left uncovered at the completion of the surgery, whereas the FC group had the graft completely covered by the flap. Clinical parameters assessed included probing depth, recession depth, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, mobility, and plaque score. Results: At 12 weeks, the mean root coverage percentages for FC and E groups were 93% and 88%, respectively. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.48). Complete root coverage was observed in 79% and 64% of the subjects in FC and E groups, respectively. There was greater increase in the width of keratinized tissue in the E group (1.5 ± 1.1 mm) than the FC group (0.9 ± 0.9 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.16). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for the changes in other parameters. Conclusions: Both procedures resulted in successful root coverage with an increase in the width of keratinized tissue. Leaving a portion of the graft exposed resulted in a greater increase of keratinized tissue, and complete coverage of the graft resulted in greater root coverage. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

KW - Connective tissue

KW - Gingival recession

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49149115757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49149115757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1902/jop.2008.070472

DO - 10.1902/jop.2008.070472

M3 - Article

C2 - 18672983

AN - SCOPUS:49149115757

VL - 79

SP - 1346

EP - 1354

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 8

ER -