Changing USA national trends for adrenalectomy: The influence of surgeon and technique

M. Francesca Monn, Adam C. Calaway, Matthew J. Mellon, Clinton Bahler, Chandru Sundaram, Ronald S. Boris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To explain differences over time between operative approach and surgeon type for adrenal surgery in the USA. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all patients undergoing adrenalectomy between 2002 and 2011 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients undergoing concurrent nephrectomy were excluded. Surgeon specialty was only available for 2003-2009. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess variables associated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and urologist-performed procedures. Results: In all, 58 948 adrenalectomies were identified. A MIS approach was used in 20% of these operations. There was a 4% increase in MIS throughout the study period (P < 0.001). Cases performed at teaching hospitals were more likely to be MIS (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, P < 0.001). We were able to identify surgical specialty in 23 746 cases, of which 60% were performed by urologists. Cases performed in the Midwest compared with Northeast were at increased adjusted odds of being performed by urologists (OR 1.38, P = 0.11). Despite most cases being performed by urologists, adrenalectomy by urologists showed a 15% annual decrease over the analysed period (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of a MIS technique to perform adrenalectomy is increasing at a slower rate compared with most other surgical extirpative procedures. Further investigation to explain the decreased performance of adrenalectomy by urologists is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)288-294
Number of pages7
JournalBJU International
Volume115
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Adrenalectomy
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Surgical Specialties
Operative Time
Nephrectomy
Teaching Hospitals
Urologists
Surgeons
Inpatients
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • adrenalectomy
  • economics
  • laparoscopy
  • national trend
  • open surgery
  • robotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Changing USA national trends for adrenalectomy : The influence of surgeon and technique. / Monn, M. Francesca; Calaway, Adam C.; Mellon, Matthew J.; Bahler, Clinton; Sundaram, Chandru; Boris, Ronald S.

In: BJU International, Vol. 115, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 288-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Monn, M. Francesca ; Calaway, Adam C. ; Mellon, Matthew J. ; Bahler, Clinton ; Sundaram, Chandru ; Boris, Ronald S. / Changing USA national trends for adrenalectomy : The influence of surgeon and technique. In: BJU International. 2015 ; Vol. 115, No. 2. pp. 288-294.
@article{3f66f9124ad646e4b52c42bb02f83200,
title = "Changing USA national trends for adrenalectomy: The influence of surgeon and technique",
abstract = "Objective: To explain differences over time between operative approach and surgeon type for adrenal surgery in the USA. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all patients undergoing adrenalectomy between 2002 and 2011 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients undergoing concurrent nephrectomy were excluded. Surgeon specialty was only available for 2003-2009. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess variables associated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and urologist-performed procedures. Results: In all, 58 948 adrenalectomies were identified. A MIS approach was used in 20{\%} of these operations. There was a 4{\%} increase in MIS throughout the study period (P < 0.001). Cases performed at teaching hospitals were more likely to be MIS (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, P < 0.001). We were able to identify surgical specialty in 23 746 cases, of which 60{\%} were performed by urologists. Cases performed in the Midwest compared with Northeast were at increased adjusted odds of being performed by urologists (OR 1.38, P = 0.11). Despite most cases being performed by urologists, adrenalectomy by urologists showed a 15{\%} annual decrease over the analysed period (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of a MIS technique to perform adrenalectomy is increasing at a slower rate compared with most other surgical extirpative procedures. Further investigation to explain the decreased performance of adrenalectomy by urologists is warranted.",
keywords = "adrenalectomy, economics, laparoscopy, national trend, open surgery, robotics",
author = "Monn, {M. Francesca} and Calaway, {Adam C.} and Mellon, {Matthew J.} and Clinton Bahler and Chandru Sundaram and Boris, {Ronald S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bju.12747",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "288--294",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing USA national trends for adrenalectomy

T2 - The influence of surgeon and technique

AU - Monn, M. Francesca

AU - Calaway, Adam C.

AU - Mellon, Matthew J.

AU - Bahler, Clinton

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

AU - Boris, Ronald S.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Objective: To explain differences over time between operative approach and surgeon type for adrenal surgery in the USA. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all patients undergoing adrenalectomy between 2002 and 2011 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients undergoing concurrent nephrectomy were excluded. Surgeon specialty was only available for 2003-2009. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess variables associated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and urologist-performed procedures. Results: In all, 58 948 adrenalectomies were identified. A MIS approach was used in 20% of these operations. There was a 4% increase in MIS throughout the study period (P < 0.001). Cases performed at teaching hospitals were more likely to be MIS (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, P < 0.001). We were able to identify surgical specialty in 23 746 cases, of which 60% were performed by urologists. Cases performed in the Midwest compared with Northeast were at increased adjusted odds of being performed by urologists (OR 1.38, P = 0.11). Despite most cases being performed by urologists, adrenalectomy by urologists showed a 15% annual decrease over the analysed period (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of a MIS technique to perform adrenalectomy is increasing at a slower rate compared with most other surgical extirpative procedures. Further investigation to explain the decreased performance of adrenalectomy by urologists is warranted.

AB - Objective: To explain differences over time between operative approach and surgeon type for adrenal surgery in the USA. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all patients undergoing adrenalectomy between 2002 and 2011 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients undergoing concurrent nephrectomy were excluded. Surgeon specialty was only available for 2003-2009. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess variables associated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and urologist-performed procedures. Results: In all, 58 948 adrenalectomies were identified. A MIS approach was used in 20% of these operations. There was a 4% increase in MIS throughout the study period (P < 0.001). Cases performed at teaching hospitals were more likely to be MIS (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, P < 0.001). We were able to identify surgical specialty in 23 746 cases, of which 60% were performed by urologists. Cases performed in the Midwest compared with Northeast were at increased adjusted odds of being performed by urologists (OR 1.38, P = 0.11). Despite most cases being performed by urologists, adrenalectomy by urologists showed a 15% annual decrease over the analysed period (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of a MIS technique to perform adrenalectomy is increasing at a slower rate compared with most other surgical extirpative procedures. Further investigation to explain the decreased performance of adrenalectomy by urologists is warranted.

KW - adrenalectomy

KW - economics

KW - laparoscopy

KW - national trend

KW - open surgery

KW - robotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921543746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921543746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bju.12747

DO - 10.1111/bju.12747

M3 - Article

C2 - 24974910

AN - SCOPUS:84921543746

VL - 115

SP - 288

EP - 294

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 2

ER -