Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters: A cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy

Eirik Hugaas Ofstad, Jan C. Frich, Edvin Schei, Richard Frankel, Jurate Šaltyte Benth, Pål Gulbrandsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To identify and classify all clinical decisions that emerged in a sample of patient-physician encounters and compare different categories of decisions across clinical settings and personal characteristics. Design Cross-sectional descriptive evaluation of hospital encounters videotaped in 2007-2008 using a novel taxonomy to identify and classify clinically relevant decisions (both actions and judgements). Participants and setting 372 patients and 58 physicians from 17 clinical specialties in ward round (WR), emergency room (ER) and outpatient (OP) encounters in a Norwegian university hospital. Results The 372 encounters contained 4976 clinically relevant decisions. The average number of decisions per encounter was 13.4 (min-max 2-40, SD 6.8). The overall distribution of the 10 topical categories in all encounters was: Defining problem: 30%, evaluating test result: 17%, drug related: 13%, gathering additional information: 10%, contact related: 10%, advice and precaution: 8%, therapeutic procedure related: 5%, deferment: 4%, legal and insurance related: 2% and treatment goal: 1%. Across three temporal categories, the distribution of decisions was 71% here-and-now, 16% preformed and 13% conditional. On average, there were 15.7 decisions per encounter in internal medicine specialties, 7.1 in ear-nose-throat encounters and 11.0-13.6 in the remaining specialties. WR encounters contained significantly more drug-related decisions than OP encounters (P=0.031) and preformed decisions than ER and OP encounters (P<0.001). ER encounters contained significantly more gathering additional information decisions than OP and WR encounters (P<0.001) and fewer problem defining decisions than WR encounters (P=0.028). There was no significant difference in the average number of decisions related to the physician's and patient's age or gender. Conclusions Patient-physician encounters contain a larger number of clinically relevant decisions than described in previous studies. Comprehensive descriptions of how decisions, both as judgements and actions, are communicated in medical encounters may serve as a first step in assessing clinical practice with respect to efficiency and quality on a provider or system level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number018042
JournalBMJ Open
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Outpatients
Cross-Sectional Studies
Physicians
Hospital Emergency Service
Internal Medicine
Pharynx
Insurance
Nose
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Ear
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • communication
  • hospital medicine
  • medical decision-making
  • patient-physician communication
  • physician behaviour
  • shared decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters : A cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy. / Ofstad, Eirik Hugaas; Frich, Jan C.; Schei, Edvin; Frankel, Richard; Benth, Jurate Šaltyte; Gulbrandsen, Pål.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 8, No. 1, 018042, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ofstad, Eirik Hugaas ; Frich, Jan C. ; Schei, Edvin ; Frankel, Richard ; Benth, Jurate Šaltyte ; Gulbrandsen, Pål. / Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters : A cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy. In: BMJ Open. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{fe5d95aebac6401cbe7e26ab47440a34,
title = "Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters: A cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy",
abstract = "Objective To identify and classify all clinical decisions that emerged in a sample of patient-physician encounters and compare different categories of decisions across clinical settings and personal characteristics. Design Cross-sectional descriptive evaluation of hospital encounters videotaped in 2007-2008 using a novel taxonomy to identify and classify clinically relevant decisions (both actions and judgements). Participants and setting 372 patients and 58 physicians from 17 clinical specialties in ward round (WR), emergency room (ER) and outpatient (OP) encounters in a Norwegian university hospital. Results The 372 encounters contained 4976 clinically relevant decisions. The average number of decisions per encounter was 13.4 (min-max 2-40, SD 6.8). The overall distribution of the 10 topical categories in all encounters was: Defining problem: 30{\%}, evaluating test result: 17{\%}, drug related: 13{\%}, gathering additional information: 10{\%}, contact related: 10{\%}, advice and precaution: 8{\%}, therapeutic procedure related: 5{\%}, deferment: 4{\%}, legal and insurance related: 2{\%} and treatment goal: 1{\%}. Across three temporal categories, the distribution of decisions was 71{\%} here-and-now, 16{\%} preformed and 13{\%} conditional. On average, there were 15.7 decisions per encounter in internal medicine specialties, 7.1 in ear-nose-throat encounters and 11.0-13.6 in the remaining specialties. WR encounters contained significantly more drug-related decisions than OP encounters (P=0.031) and preformed decisions than ER and OP encounters (P<0.001). ER encounters contained significantly more gathering additional information decisions than OP and WR encounters (P<0.001) and fewer problem defining decisions than WR encounters (P=0.028). There was no significant difference in the average number of decisions related to the physician's and patient's age or gender. Conclusions Patient-physician encounters contain a larger number of clinically relevant decisions than described in previous studies. Comprehensive descriptions of how decisions, both as judgements and actions, are communicated in medical encounters may serve as a first step in assessing clinical practice with respect to efficiency and quality on a provider or system level.",
keywords = "communication, hospital medicine, medical decision-making, patient-physician communication, physician behaviour, shared decision-making",
author = "Ofstad, {Eirik Hugaas} and Frich, {Jan C.} and Edvin Schei and Richard Frankel and Benth, {Jurate Šaltyte} and P{\aa}l Gulbrandsen",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters

T2 - A cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy

AU - Ofstad, Eirik Hugaas

AU - Frich, Jan C.

AU - Schei, Edvin

AU - Frankel, Richard

AU - Benth, Jurate Šaltyte

AU - Gulbrandsen, Pål

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective To identify and classify all clinical decisions that emerged in a sample of patient-physician encounters and compare different categories of decisions across clinical settings and personal characteristics. Design Cross-sectional descriptive evaluation of hospital encounters videotaped in 2007-2008 using a novel taxonomy to identify and classify clinically relevant decisions (both actions and judgements). Participants and setting 372 patients and 58 physicians from 17 clinical specialties in ward round (WR), emergency room (ER) and outpatient (OP) encounters in a Norwegian university hospital. Results The 372 encounters contained 4976 clinically relevant decisions. The average number of decisions per encounter was 13.4 (min-max 2-40, SD 6.8). The overall distribution of the 10 topical categories in all encounters was: Defining problem: 30%, evaluating test result: 17%, drug related: 13%, gathering additional information: 10%, contact related: 10%, advice and precaution: 8%, therapeutic procedure related: 5%, deferment: 4%, legal and insurance related: 2% and treatment goal: 1%. Across three temporal categories, the distribution of decisions was 71% here-and-now, 16% preformed and 13% conditional. On average, there were 15.7 decisions per encounter in internal medicine specialties, 7.1 in ear-nose-throat encounters and 11.0-13.6 in the remaining specialties. WR encounters contained significantly more drug-related decisions than OP encounters (P=0.031) and preformed decisions than ER and OP encounters (P<0.001). ER encounters contained significantly more gathering additional information decisions than OP and WR encounters (P<0.001) and fewer problem defining decisions than WR encounters (P=0.028). There was no significant difference in the average number of decisions related to the physician's and patient's age or gender. Conclusions Patient-physician encounters contain a larger number of clinically relevant decisions than described in previous studies. Comprehensive descriptions of how decisions, both as judgements and actions, are communicated in medical encounters may serve as a first step in assessing clinical practice with respect to efficiency and quality on a provider or system level.

AB - Objective To identify and classify all clinical decisions that emerged in a sample of patient-physician encounters and compare different categories of decisions across clinical settings and personal characteristics. Design Cross-sectional descriptive evaluation of hospital encounters videotaped in 2007-2008 using a novel taxonomy to identify and classify clinically relevant decisions (both actions and judgements). Participants and setting 372 patients and 58 physicians from 17 clinical specialties in ward round (WR), emergency room (ER) and outpatient (OP) encounters in a Norwegian university hospital. Results The 372 encounters contained 4976 clinically relevant decisions. The average number of decisions per encounter was 13.4 (min-max 2-40, SD 6.8). The overall distribution of the 10 topical categories in all encounters was: Defining problem: 30%, evaluating test result: 17%, drug related: 13%, gathering additional information: 10%, contact related: 10%, advice and precaution: 8%, therapeutic procedure related: 5%, deferment: 4%, legal and insurance related: 2% and treatment goal: 1%. Across three temporal categories, the distribution of decisions was 71% here-and-now, 16% preformed and 13% conditional. On average, there were 15.7 decisions per encounter in internal medicine specialties, 7.1 in ear-nose-throat encounters and 11.0-13.6 in the remaining specialties. WR encounters contained significantly more drug-related decisions than OP encounters (P=0.031) and preformed decisions than ER and OP encounters (P<0.001). ER encounters contained significantly more gathering additional information decisions than OP and WR encounters (P<0.001) and fewer problem defining decisions than WR encounters (P=0.028). There was no significant difference in the average number of decisions related to the physician's and patient's age or gender. Conclusions Patient-physician encounters contain a larger number of clinically relevant decisions than described in previous studies. Comprehensive descriptions of how decisions, both as judgements and actions, are communicated in medical encounters may serve as a first step in assessing clinical practice with respect to efficiency and quality on a provider or system level.

KW - communication

KW - hospital medicine

KW - medical decision-making

KW - patient-physician communication

KW - physician behaviour

KW - shared decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040559485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040559485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018042

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018042

M3 - Article

C2 - 29306883

AN - SCOPUS:85040559485

VL - 8

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 1

M1 - 018042

ER -