Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems

Lessons from the pediatric asthma care PORT

Jonathan A. Finkelstein, Paula Lozano, Kachen A. Streiff, Kelly E. Arduino, Cynthia A. Sisk, Edward H. Wagner, Kevin B. Weiss, Thomas Inui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To highlight the unique challenges of evaluative research on practice behavior change in the "real world" settings of contemporary managed-care organizations, using the experience of the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT (Patient Outcomes Research Team). Study Setting. The Pediatric Asthma Care PORT is a five-year initiative funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study strategies for asthma care improvement in three managed-care plans in Chicago, Seattle, and Boston. At its core is a randomized trial of two care improvement strategies compared with usual care: (1) a targeted physician education program using practice based Peer Leaders (PL) as change agents, (2) adding to the PL intervention a "Planned Asthma Care Intervention" incorporating joint "asthma check-ups" by nurse-physician teams. During the trial, each of the participating organizations viewed asthma care improvement as an immediate priority and had their own corporate improvement programs underway. Data Collection. Investigators at each health plan described the organizational and implementation challenges in conducting the PAC PORT randomized trial. These experiences were reviewed for common themes and "lessons" that might be useful to investigators planning interventional research in similar care-delivery settings. Conclusions. Randomized trials in "real world" settings represent the most robust design available to test care improvement strategies. In complex, rapidly changing managed-care organizations, blinding is not feasible, corporate initiatives may complicate implementation, and the assumption that a "usual care" arm will be static is highly likely to be mistaken. Investigators must be prepared to use innovative strategies to maintain the integrity of the study design, including: continuous improvement within the intervention arms, comanagement by researchers and health plan managers of condition-related quality improvement initiatives, procedures for avoiding respondent burden in health plan enrollees, and anticipation and minimization of risks from experimental arm contamination and major organizational change. With attention to these delivery system issues, as well as the usual design features of randomized trials, we believe managed-care organizations can serve as important laboratories to test care improvement strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)775-789
Number of pages15
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Managed Care Programs
managed care
patient care
Patient Care
Asthma
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics
Research
Research Personnel
Organizations
Health
Physicians
Organizational Innovation
Health Services Research
Quality Improvement
health
physician
leader
planning research
co-management

Keywords

  • Childhood asthma
  • Guideline implementation
  • Managed-care research
  • Physician behavior change
  • Randomized trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Finkelstein, J. A., Lozano, P., Streiff, K. A., Arduino, K. E., Sisk, C. A., Wagner, E. H., ... Inui, T. (2002). Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: Lessons from the pediatric asthma care PORT. Health Services Research, 37(3), 775-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00048

Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems : Lessons from the pediatric asthma care PORT. / Finkelstein, Jonathan A.; Lozano, Paula; Streiff, Kachen A.; Arduino, Kelly E.; Sisk, Cynthia A.; Wagner, Edward H.; Weiss, Kevin B.; Inui, Thomas.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 37, No. 3, 06.2002, p. 775-789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Finkelstein, JA, Lozano, P, Streiff, KA, Arduino, KE, Sisk, CA, Wagner, EH, Weiss, KB & Inui, T 2002, 'Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: Lessons from the pediatric asthma care PORT', Health Services Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 775-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00048
Finkelstein, Jonathan A. ; Lozano, Paula ; Streiff, Kachen A. ; Arduino, Kelly E. ; Sisk, Cynthia A. ; Wagner, Edward H. ; Weiss, Kevin B. ; Inui, Thomas. / Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems : Lessons from the pediatric asthma care PORT. In: Health Services Research. 2002 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 775-789.
@article{4e7cc952c4b746e3b4324422c29b0270,
title = "Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: Lessons from the pediatric asthma care PORT",
abstract = "Objective. To highlight the unique challenges of evaluative research on practice behavior change in the {"}real world{"} settings of contemporary managed-care organizations, using the experience of the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT (Patient Outcomes Research Team). Study Setting. The Pediatric Asthma Care PORT is a five-year initiative funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study strategies for asthma care improvement in three managed-care plans in Chicago, Seattle, and Boston. At its core is a randomized trial of two care improvement strategies compared with usual care: (1) a targeted physician education program using practice based Peer Leaders (PL) as change agents, (2) adding to the PL intervention a {"}Planned Asthma Care Intervention{"} incorporating joint {"}asthma check-ups{"} by nurse-physician teams. During the trial, each of the participating organizations viewed asthma care improvement as an immediate priority and had their own corporate improvement programs underway. Data Collection. Investigators at each health plan described the organizational and implementation challenges in conducting the PAC PORT randomized trial. These experiences were reviewed for common themes and {"}lessons{"} that might be useful to investigators planning interventional research in similar care-delivery settings. Conclusions. Randomized trials in {"}real world{"} settings represent the most robust design available to test care improvement strategies. In complex, rapidly changing managed-care organizations, blinding is not feasible, corporate initiatives may complicate implementation, and the assumption that a {"}usual care{"} arm will be static is highly likely to be mistaken. Investigators must be prepared to use innovative strategies to maintain the integrity of the study design, including: continuous improvement within the intervention arms, comanagement by researchers and health plan managers of condition-related quality improvement initiatives, procedures for avoiding respondent burden in health plan enrollees, and anticipation and minimization of risks from experimental arm contamination and major organizational change. With attention to these delivery system issues, as well as the usual design features of randomized trials, we believe managed-care organizations can serve as important laboratories to test care improvement strategies.",
keywords = "Childhood asthma, Guideline implementation, Managed-care research, Physician behavior change, Randomized trials",
author = "Finkelstein, {Jonathan A.} and Paula Lozano and Streiff, {Kachen A.} and Arduino, {Kelly E.} and Sisk, {Cynthia A.} and Wagner, {Edward H.} and Weiss, {Kevin B.} and Thomas Inui",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.00048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "775--789",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems

T2 - Lessons from the pediatric asthma care PORT

AU - Finkelstein, Jonathan A.

AU - Lozano, Paula

AU - Streiff, Kachen A.

AU - Arduino, Kelly E.

AU - Sisk, Cynthia A.

AU - Wagner, Edward H.

AU - Weiss, Kevin B.

AU - Inui, Thomas

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - Objective. To highlight the unique challenges of evaluative research on practice behavior change in the "real world" settings of contemporary managed-care organizations, using the experience of the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT (Patient Outcomes Research Team). Study Setting. The Pediatric Asthma Care PORT is a five-year initiative funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study strategies for asthma care improvement in three managed-care plans in Chicago, Seattle, and Boston. At its core is a randomized trial of two care improvement strategies compared with usual care: (1) a targeted physician education program using practice based Peer Leaders (PL) as change agents, (2) adding to the PL intervention a "Planned Asthma Care Intervention" incorporating joint "asthma check-ups" by nurse-physician teams. During the trial, each of the participating organizations viewed asthma care improvement as an immediate priority and had their own corporate improvement programs underway. Data Collection. Investigators at each health plan described the organizational and implementation challenges in conducting the PAC PORT randomized trial. These experiences were reviewed for common themes and "lessons" that might be useful to investigators planning interventional research in similar care-delivery settings. Conclusions. Randomized trials in "real world" settings represent the most robust design available to test care improvement strategies. In complex, rapidly changing managed-care organizations, blinding is not feasible, corporate initiatives may complicate implementation, and the assumption that a "usual care" arm will be static is highly likely to be mistaken. Investigators must be prepared to use innovative strategies to maintain the integrity of the study design, including: continuous improvement within the intervention arms, comanagement by researchers and health plan managers of condition-related quality improvement initiatives, procedures for avoiding respondent burden in health plan enrollees, and anticipation and minimization of risks from experimental arm contamination and major organizational change. With attention to these delivery system issues, as well as the usual design features of randomized trials, we believe managed-care organizations can serve as important laboratories to test care improvement strategies.

AB - Objective. To highlight the unique challenges of evaluative research on practice behavior change in the "real world" settings of contemporary managed-care organizations, using the experience of the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT (Patient Outcomes Research Team). Study Setting. The Pediatric Asthma Care PORT is a five-year initiative funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study strategies for asthma care improvement in three managed-care plans in Chicago, Seattle, and Boston. At its core is a randomized trial of two care improvement strategies compared with usual care: (1) a targeted physician education program using practice based Peer Leaders (PL) as change agents, (2) adding to the PL intervention a "Planned Asthma Care Intervention" incorporating joint "asthma check-ups" by nurse-physician teams. During the trial, each of the participating organizations viewed asthma care improvement as an immediate priority and had their own corporate improvement programs underway. Data Collection. Investigators at each health plan described the organizational and implementation challenges in conducting the PAC PORT randomized trial. These experiences were reviewed for common themes and "lessons" that might be useful to investigators planning interventional research in similar care-delivery settings. Conclusions. Randomized trials in "real world" settings represent the most robust design available to test care improvement strategies. In complex, rapidly changing managed-care organizations, blinding is not feasible, corporate initiatives may complicate implementation, and the assumption that a "usual care" arm will be static is highly likely to be mistaken. Investigators must be prepared to use innovative strategies to maintain the integrity of the study design, including: continuous improvement within the intervention arms, comanagement by researchers and health plan managers of condition-related quality improvement initiatives, procedures for avoiding respondent burden in health plan enrollees, and anticipation and minimization of risks from experimental arm contamination and major organizational change. With attention to these delivery system issues, as well as the usual design features of randomized trials, we believe managed-care organizations can serve as important laboratories to test care improvement strategies.

KW - Childhood asthma

KW - Guideline implementation

KW - Managed-care research

KW - Physician behavior change

KW - Randomized trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036615185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036615185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.00048

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.00048

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 775

EP - 789

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 3

ER -