Colorectal cancer screening beliefs: Focus groups with first-degree relatives

Susan Rawl, Usha Menon, Victoria Champion, June L. Foster, Celette Sugg Skinner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to describe the perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening reported by first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, the authors used focus groups to identify perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening among parents and children of colorectal cancer patients. Four focus groups were conducted with relatives of colorectal cancer patients seen at two university medical centers in the Midwest. The groups ranged in size from five to eight members each and were stratified by gender. Results: Four benefits of colorectal cancer screening were identified by participants: finding colorectal cancer early, decreasing the chances of dying from colorectal cancer, freedom from worry about colorectal cancer, and reassurance that one was cancer-free. Four main barriers were identified that applied to all four types of colorectal cancer screening or to colorectal cancer screening in general. These included inadequate public awareness of colorectal cancer, inconsistent recommendations from health-care providers, concerns about the efficacy of screening tests, and embarrassment. Barriers unique to each screening test also were identified. Conclusions: Understanding individual beliefs about the benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening will allow clinicians and researchers to develop effective interventions to increase screening. Results from the focus groups have been used to develop an instrument to measure benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening, which now needs to be tested with more culturally and socioeconomically diverse groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-37
Number of pages6
JournalCancer Practice
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Health Personnel
Parents
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Beliefs
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Focus groups
  • Methodology
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Colorectal cancer screening beliefs : Focus groups with first-degree relatives. / Rawl, Susan; Menon, Usha; Champion, Victoria; Foster, June L.; Skinner, Celette Sugg.

In: Cancer Practice, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 32-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rawl, Susan ; Menon, Usha ; Champion, Victoria ; Foster, June L. ; Skinner, Celette Sugg. / Colorectal cancer screening beliefs : Focus groups with first-degree relatives. In: Cancer Practice. 2000 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 32-37.
@article{9c7f62f651844721be719259c778cf30,
title = "Colorectal cancer screening beliefs: Focus groups with first-degree relatives",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to describe the perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening reported by first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, the authors used focus groups to identify perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening among parents and children of colorectal cancer patients. Four focus groups were conducted with relatives of colorectal cancer patients seen at two university medical centers in the Midwest. The groups ranged in size from five to eight members each and were stratified by gender. Results: Four benefits of colorectal cancer screening were identified by participants: finding colorectal cancer early, decreasing the chances of dying from colorectal cancer, freedom from worry about colorectal cancer, and reassurance that one was cancer-free. Four main barriers were identified that applied to all four types of colorectal cancer screening or to colorectal cancer screening in general. These included inadequate public awareness of colorectal cancer, inconsistent recommendations from health-care providers, concerns about the efficacy of screening tests, and embarrassment. Barriers unique to each screening test also were identified. Conclusions: Understanding individual beliefs about the benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening will allow clinicians and researchers to develop effective interventions to increase screening. Results from the focus groups have been used to develop an instrument to measure benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening, which now needs to be tested with more culturally and socioeconomically diverse groups.",
keywords = "Beliefs, Colorectal cancer, Focus groups, Methodology, Screening",
author = "Susan Rawl and Usha Menon and Victoria Champion and Foster, {June L.} and Skinner, {Celette Sugg}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.81006.x",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "32--37",
journal = "Cancer Practice",
issn = "1065-4704",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colorectal cancer screening beliefs

T2 - Focus groups with first-degree relatives

AU - Rawl, Susan

AU - Menon, Usha

AU - Champion, Victoria

AU - Foster, June L.

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to describe the perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening reported by first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, the authors used focus groups to identify perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening among parents and children of colorectal cancer patients. Four focus groups were conducted with relatives of colorectal cancer patients seen at two university medical centers in the Midwest. The groups ranged in size from five to eight members each and were stratified by gender. Results: Four benefits of colorectal cancer screening were identified by participants: finding colorectal cancer early, decreasing the chances of dying from colorectal cancer, freedom from worry about colorectal cancer, and reassurance that one was cancer-free. Four main barriers were identified that applied to all four types of colorectal cancer screening or to colorectal cancer screening in general. These included inadequate public awareness of colorectal cancer, inconsistent recommendations from health-care providers, concerns about the efficacy of screening tests, and embarrassment. Barriers unique to each screening test also were identified. Conclusions: Understanding individual beliefs about the benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening will allow clinicians and researchers to develop effective interventions to increase screening. Results from the focus groups have been used to develop an instrument to measure benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening, which now needs to be tested with more culturally and socioeconomically diverse groups.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to describe the perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening reported by first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, the authors used focus groups to identify perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening among parents and children of colorectal cancer patients. Four focus groups were conducted with relatives of colorectal cancer patients seen at two university medical centers in the Midwest. The groups ranged in size from five to eight members each and were stratified by gender. Results: Four benefits of colorectal cancer screening were identified by participants: finding colorectal cancer early, decreasing the chances of dying from colorectal cancer, freedom from worry about colorectal cancer, and reassurance that one was cancer-free. Four main barriers were identified that applied to all four types of colorectal cancer screening or to colorectal cancer screening in general. These included inadequate public awareness of colorectal cancer, inconsistent recommendations from health-care providers, concerns about the efficacy of screening tests, and embarrassment. Barriers unique to each screening test also were identified. Conclusions: Understanding individual beliefs about the benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening will allow clinicians and researchers to develop effective interventions to increase screening. Results from the focus groups have been used to develop an instrument to measure benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening, which now needs to be tested with more culturally and socioeconomically diverse groups.

KW - Beliefs

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Focus groups

KW - Methodology

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033966771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033966771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.81006.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.81006.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 10732537

AN - SCOPUS:0033966771

VL - 8

SP - 32

EP - 37

JO - Cancer Practice

JF - Cancer Practice

SN - 1065-4704

IS - 1

ER -