Comparative evaluation of mandibular canal visibility on crosssectional cone-beam CT images: A retrospective study

Mahogany S. Miles, Edwin T. Parks, George J. Eckert, Steven Blanchard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the visibility of the mandibular canal (MC) in CBCT images and if the visibility of the MC is affected by gender, location and/ or age. Methods: CBCT images were evaluated for the visibility of the MC by a board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologist, a board-certified periodontist and a periodontics resident. Representative slices were examined for the first premolar (PM1), second premolar (PM2), first molar (M1) and second molar (M2) sites by all examiners. The visibility of the MC was registered as either present or absent. Results: 360 total CBCT cross-sectional images were examined, with the MC identified in 204 sites (56%). Age had a significant effect on MC visibility, but it differed by location: for PM1, age 47-56 had lower visibility than age 65+ (p = 0.0377). Gender also had a significant effect on canal visibility, where females had lower visibility than males overall (p= 0.0178) and had the most pronounced difference for PM1 (p = 0.0054). Location had a significant effect on visibility, but it differed by age and by gender: for age 651, M2 had lower visibility than PM1 (p = 0.0411) and PM2 (p = 0.0180), while for females, PM1 had lower visibility than M1 (p = 0.0123) and M2 (p = 0.0419). Conclusions: The MC was visualized only in just over half of the CBCT images. Age, gender and location had significant effects on the visibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20150296
JournalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Bicuspid
Retrospective Studies
Periodontics
Dentists
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Cone-beam ct
  • Dental implants
  • Diagnostic imaging
  • Mandible
  • Radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparative evaluation of mandibular canal visibility on crosssectional cone-beam CT images : A retrospective study. / Miles, Mahogany S.; Parks, Edwin T.; Eckert, George J.; Blanchard, Steven.

In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 45, No. 2, 20150296, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd4ac9efe89249c3843f0b7aa296f2af,
title = "Comparative evaluation of mandibular canal visibility on crosssectional cone-beam CT images: A retrospective study",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the visibility of the mandibular canal (MC) in CBCT images and if the visibility of the MC is affected by gender, location and/ or age. Methods: CBCT images were evaluated for the visibility of the MC by a board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologist, a board-certified periodontist and a periodontics resident. Representative slices were examined for the first premolar (PM1), second premolar (PM2), first molar (M1) and second molar (M2) sites by all examiners. The visibility of the MC was registered as either present or absent. Results: 360 total CBCT cross-sectional images were examined, with the MC identified in 204 sites (56{\%}). Age had a significant effect on MC visibility, but it differed by location: for PM1, age 47-56 had lower visibility than age 65+ (p = 0.0377). Gender also had a significant effect on canal visibility, where females had lower visibility than males overall (p= 0.0178) and had the most pronounced difference for PM1 (p = 0.0054). Location had a significant effect on visibility, but it differed by age and by gender: for age 651, M2 had lower visibility than PM1 (p = 0.0411) and PM2 (p = 0.0180), while for females, PM1 had lower visibility than M1 (p = 0.0123) and M2 (p = 0.0419). Conclusions: The MC was visualized only in just over half of the CBCT images. Age, gender and location had significant effects on the visibility.",
keywords = "Cone-beam ct, Dental implants, Diagnostic imaging, Mandible, Radiology",
author = "Miles, {Mahogany S.} and Parks, {Edwin T.} and Eckert, {George J.} and Steven Blanchard",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1259/dmfr.20150296",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
journal = "Dentomaxillofacial Radiology",
issn = "0250-832X",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative evaluation of mandibular canal visibility on crosssectional cone-beam CT images

T2 - A retrospective study

AU - Miles, Mahogany S.

AU - Parks, Edwin T.

AU - Eckert, George J.

AU - Blanchard, Steven

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the visibility of the mandibular canal (MC) in CBCT images and if the visibility of the MC is affected by gender, location and/ or age. Methods: CBCT images were evaluated for the visibility of the MC by a board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologist, a board-certified periodontist and a periodontics resident. Representative slices were examined for the first premolar (PM1), second premolar (PM2), first molar (M1) and second molar (M2) sites by all examiners. The visibility of the MC was registered as either present or absent. Results: 360 total CBCT cross-sectional images were examined, with the MC identified in 204 sites (56%). Age had a significant effect on MC visibility, but it differed by location: for PM1, age 47-56 had lower visibility than age 65+ (p = 0.0377). Gender also had a significant effect on canal visibility, where females had lower visibility than males overall (p= 0.0178) and had the most pronounced difference for PM1 (p = 0.0054). Location had a significant effect on visibility, but it differed by age and by gender: for age 651, M2 had lower visibility than PM1 (p = 0.0411) and PM2 (p = 0.0180), while for females, PM1 had lower visibility than M1 (p = 0.0123) and M2 (p = 0.0419). Conclusions: The MC was visualized only in just over half of the CBCT images. Age, gender and location had significant effects on the visibility.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the visibility of the mandibular canal (MC) in CBCT images and if the visibility of the MC is affected by gender, location and/ or age. Methods: CBCT images were evaluated for the visibility of the MC by a board-certified oral and maxillofacial radiologist, a board-certified periodontist and a periodontics resident. Representative slices were examined for the first premolar (PM1), second premolar (PM2), first molar (M1) and second molar (M2) sites by all examiners. The visibility of the MC was registered as either present or absent. Results: 360 total CBCT cross-sectional images were examined, with the MC identified in 204 sites (56%). Age had a significant effect on MC visibility, but it differed by location: for PM1, age 47-56 had lower visibility than age 65+ (p = 0.0377). Gender also had a significant effect on canal visibility, where females had lower visibility than males overall (p= 0.0178) and had the most pronounced difference for PM1 (p = 0.0054). Location had a significant effect on visibility, but it differed by age and by gender: for age 651, M2 had lower visibility than PM1 (p = 0.0411) and PM2 (p = 0.0180), while for females, PM1 had lower visibility than M1 (p = 0.0123) and M2 (p = 0.0419). Conclusions: The MC was visualized only in just over half of the CBCT images. Age, gender and location had significant effects on the visibility.

KW - Cone-beam ct

KW - Dental implants

KW - Diagnostic imaging

KW - Mandible

KW - Radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956615005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956615005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20150296

DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20150296

M3 - Article

C2 - 26545046

AN - SCOPUS:84956615005

VL - 45

JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

SN - 0250-832X

IS - 2

M1 - 20150296

ER -