Comparison of contrast angiography and two-dimensional echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities after acute myocardial infarction

Craig Lundgren, Patrick D V Bourdillon, James C. Dillon, Harvey Feigenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities were assessed using 2-dimensional echocardiography and contrast ventriculography within 12 hours of the onset of chest pain in 20 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); 10 patients had anterior infarctions and 10 had inferior. End-diastolic and end-systole sinus beats from right anterior oblique contrast ventriculograms were analyzed using the center-line chord technique with both a standard overlap method of chord assignment and a nonoverlap method. Echocardiograms were obtained in parasternal long- and short-axis and apical 2- and 4-chamber views and analyzed using a 16-segment scoring system to derive anterior and infero-posterolateral wall motion indexes using both overlap (10 segments for anterior, 8 inferior) as well as nonoverlap (9 segments anterior, 7 inferior) methods of segment assignment. There was a significant inverse correlation between the standard (nonoverlap) echocardiographic analysis and the standard (overlap) angiographic analysis for infarct regions (y = -0.43 × + 1.11, r = -0.59, p < 0.05). Fifteen of 18 patients with angiographic infarct regional score <- -1 standard deviation/ chord had an echocardiographic index ≥1.5, while 15 of 16 patients with echocardiographic regional infarct index ≥1.5 had an angiographic score <--1 standard deviation/chord. Correlation between the 2 methods for noninfarct territories was poor (r = -0.34) because the angiographic method assesses hyperkinesis while the echocardiographic method does not. For noninfarct regions, 13 of 16 patients with an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord had an echocardiographic index <1.5, while 13 of 15 patients with an echocardiographic regional index of <1.5 had an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord. In comparing overlap and nonoverlap methods, significant differences were found for noninfarct regions but not for infarct regions for both echocardiographic and angiographic analyses. Data indicate that 2-dimensional echocardiography, which is non-invasive and more easily repeatabte for serial studies, yields similar results to contrast angiography for the assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities after AMI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1077
Number of pages7
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume65
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1990

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Angiography
Myocardial Infarction
Systole
Chest Pain
Infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of contrast angiography and two-dimensional echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities after acute myocardial infarction. / Lundgren, Craig; Bourdillon, Patrick D V; Dillon, James C.; Feigenbaum, Harvey.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 65, No. 16, 01.05.1990, p. 1071-1077.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7aae2c0be9244878bc6d864a2bbb0f79,
title = "Comparison of contrast angiography and two-dimensional echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities after acute myocardial infarction",
abstract = "Regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities were assessed using 2-dimensional echocardiography and contrast ventriculography within 12 hours of the onset of chest pain in 20 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); 10 patients had anterior infarctions and 10 had inferior. End-diastolic and end-systole sinus beats from right anterior oblique contrast ventriculograms were analyzed using the center-line chord technique with both a standard overlap method of chord assignment and a nonoverlap method. Echocardiograms were obtained in parasternal long- and short-axis and apical 2- and 4-chamber views and analyzed using a 16-segment scoring system to derive anterior and infero-posterolateral wall motion indexes using both overlap (10 segments for anterior, 8 inferior) as well as nonoverlap (9 segments anterior, 7 inferior) methods of segment assignment. There was a significant inverse correlation between the standard (nonoverlap) echocardiographic analysis and the standard (overlap) angiographic analysis for infarct regions (y = -0.43 × + 1.11, r = -0.59, p < 0.05). Fifteen of 18 patients with angiographic infarct regional score <- -1 standard deviation/ chord had an echocardiographic index ≥1.5, while 15 of 16 patients with echocardiographic regional infarct index ≥1.5 had an angiographic score <--1 standard deviation/chord. Correlation between the 2 methods for noninfarct territories was poor (r = -0.34) because the angiographic method assesses hyperkinesis while the echocardiographic method does not. For noninfarct regions, 13 of 16 patients with an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord had an echocardiographic index <1.5, while 13 of 15 patients with an echocardiographic regional index of <1.5 had an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord. In comparing overlap and nonoverlap methods, significant differences were found for noninfarct regions but not for infarct regions for both echocardiographic and angiographic analyses. Data indicate that 2-dimensional echocardiography, which is non-invasive and more easily repeatabte for serial studies, yields similar results to contrast angiography for the assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities after AMI.",
author = "Craig Lundgren and Bourdillon, {Patrick D V} and Dillon, {James C.} and Harvey Feigenbaum",
year = "1990",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9149(90)90316-S",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1071--1077",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of contrast angiography and two-dimensional echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities after acute myocardial infarction

AU - Lundgren, Craig

AU - Bourdillon, Patrick D V

AU - Dillon, James C.

AU - Feigenbaum, Harvey

PY - 1990/5/1

Y1 - 1990/5/1

N2 - Regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities were assessed using 2-dimensional echocardiography and contrast ventriculography within 12 hours of the onset of chest pain in 20 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); 10 patients had anterior infarctions and 10 had inferior. End-diastolic and end-systole sinus beats from right anterior oblique contrast ventriculograms were analyzed using the center-line chord technique with both a standard overlap method of chord assignment and a nonoverlap method. Echocardiograms were obtained in parasternal long- and short-axis and apical 2- and 4-chamber views and analyzed using a 16-segment scoring system to derive anterior and infero-posterolateral wall motion indexes using both overlap (10 segments for anterior, 8 inferior) as well as nonoverlap (9 segments anterior, 7 inferior) methods of segment assignment. There was a significant inverse correlation between the standard (nonoverlap) echocardiographic analysis and the standard (overlap) angiographic analysis for infarct regions (y = -0.43 × + 1.11, r = -0.59, p < 0.05). Fifteen of 18 patients with angiographic infarct regional score <- -1 standard deviation/ chord had an echocardiographic index ≥1.5, while 15 of 16 patients with echocardiographic regional infarct index ≥1.5 had an angiographic score <--1 standard deviation/chord. Correlation between the 2 methods for noninfarct territories was poor (r = -0.34) because the angiographic method assesses hyperkinesis while the echocardiographic method does not. For noninfarct regions, 13 of 16 patients with an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord had an echocardiographic index <1.5, while 13 of 15 patients with an echocardiographic regional index of <1.5 had an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord. In comparing overlap and nonoverlap methods, significant differences were found for noninfarct regions but not for infarct regions for both echocardiographic and angiographic analyses. Data indicate that 2-dimensional echocardiography, which is non-invasive and more easily repeatabte for serial studies, yields similar results to contrast angiography for the assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities after AMI.

AB - Regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities were assessed using 2-dimensional echocardiography and contrast ventriculography within 12 hours of the onset of chest pain in 20 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); 10 patients had anterior infarctions and 10 had inferior. End-diastolic and end-systole sinus beats from right anterior oblique contrast ventriculograms were analyzed using the center-line chord technique with both a standard overlap method of chord assignment and a nonoverlap method. Echocardiograms were obtained in parasternal long- and short-axis and apical 2- and 4-chamber views and analyzed using a 16-segment scoring system to derive anterior and infero-posterolateral wall motion indexes using both overlap (10 segments for anterior, 8 inferior) as well as nonoverlap (9 segments anterior, 7 inferior) methods of segment assignment. There was a significant inverse correlation between the standard (nonoverlap) echocardiographic analysis and the standard (overlap) angiographic analysis for infarct regions (y = -0.43 × + 1.11, r = -0.59, p < 0.05). Fifteen of 18 patients with angiographic infarct regional score <- -1 standard deviation/ chord had an echocardiographic index ≥1.5, while 15 of 16 patients with echocardiographic regional infarct index ≥1.5 had an angiographic score <--1 standard deviation/chord. Correlation between the 2 methods for noninfarct territories was poor (r = -0.34) because the angiographic method assesses hyperkinesis while the echocardiographic method does not. For noninfarct regions, 13 of 16 patients with an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord had an echocardiographic index <1.5, while 13 of 15 patients with an echocardiographic regional index of <1.5 had an angiographic score >-1 standard deviation/chord. In comparing overlap and nonoverlap methods, significant differences were found for noninfarct regions but not for infarct regions for both echocardiographic and angiographic analyses. Data indicate that 2-dimensional echocardiography, which is non-invasive and more easily repeatabte for serial studies, yields similar results to contrast angiography for the assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities after AMI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025217642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025217642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90316-S

DO - 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90316-S

M3 - Article

C2 - 2330892

AN - SCOPUS:0025217642

VL - 65

SP - 1071

EP - 1077

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 16

ER -