Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence

J. P. Rice, T. Reich, K. K. Bucholz, R. J. Neuman, R. Fishman, N. Rochberg, V. M. Hesselbrock, John Nurnberger, M. A. Schuckit, H. Begleiter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

360 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using data from The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, we compare direct interview diagnoses of alcohol dependence to those obtained by history from family members. Using a requirement of three or more positive implications by history, the specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive values are 98%, 39%, and 45%, respectively. A logistic analysis found the gender of the relative and alcoholism in the informant to be significant, but not the gender of the informant. The partial odds ratio of a diagnosis at interview associated with a positive family history diagnosis was 13.6. The relationship between the informant and relative was significant, with negative reports from an offspring or mate more influential than a negative report from a parent or second-degree relative. We derived a recursive equation to combine a variable number of family history reports, wherein the probabilities associated with a single report are computed from the logistic analysis. This permits the use of family history information both as a proxy for an uninterviewed relative, as well as a second source of information to be used in the analysis of genetic family data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1018-1023
Number of pages6
JournalAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Alcoholism
Alcohols
Interviews
Logistics
History
Proxy
Odds Ratio
Sensitivity and Specificity
Genetics

Keywords

  • DSM-III-R Alcohol Dependence
  • Family History Diagnoses
  • Genetic Analysis
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Rice, J. P., Reich, T., Bucholz, K. K., Neuman, R. J., Fishman, R., Rochberg, N., ... Begleiter, H. (1995). Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 19(4), 1018-1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb00983.x

Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence. / Rice, J. P.; Reich, T.; Bucholz, K. K.; Neuman, R. J.; Fishman, R.; Rochberg, N.; Hesselbrock, V. M.; Nurnberger, John; Schuckit, M. A.; Begleiter, H.

In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1995, p. 1018-1023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rice, JP, Reich, T, Bucholz, KK, Neuman, RJ, Fishman, R, Rochberg, N, Hesselbrock, VM, Nurnberger, J, Schuckit, MA & Begleiter, H 1995, 'Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence', Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1018-1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb00983.x
Rice, J. P. ; Reich, T. ; Bucholz, K. K. ; Neuman, R. J. ; Fishman, R. ; Rochberg, N. ; Hesselbrock, V. M. ; Nurnberger, John ; Schuckit, M. A. ; Begleiter, H. / Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence. In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 1995 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 1018-1023.
@article{987d55bceebe4a51abc2143def93a06c,
title = "Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence",
abstract = "Using data from The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, we compare direct interview diagnoses of alcohol dependence to those obtained by history from family members. Using a requirement of three or more positive implications by history, the specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive values are 98{\%}, 39{\%}, and 45{\%}, respectively. A logistic analysis found the gender of the relative and alcoholism in the informant to be significant, but not the gender of the informant. The partial odds ratio of a diagnosis at interview associated with a positive family history diagnosis was 13.6. The relationship between the informant and relative was significant, with negative reports from an offspring or mate more influential than a negative report from a parent or second-degree relative. We derived a recursive equation to combine a variable number of family history reports, wherein the probabilities associated with a single report are computed from the logistic analysis. This permits the use of family history information both as a proxy for an uninterviewed relative, as well as a second source of information to be used in the analysis of genetic family data.",
keywords = "DSM-III-R Alcohol Dependence, Family History Diagnoses, Genetic Analysis, Specificity",
author = "Rice, {J. P.} and T. Reich and Bucholz, {K. K.} and Neuman, {R. J.} and R. Fishman and N. Rochberg and Hesselbrock, {V. M.} and John Nurnberger and Schuckit, {M. A.} and H. Begleiter",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb00983.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1018--1023",
journal = "Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research",
issn = "0145-6008",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence

AU - Rice, J. P.

AU - Reich, T.

AU - Bucholz, K. K.

AU - Neuman, R. J.

AU - Fishman, R.

AU - Rochberg, N.

AU - Hesselbrock, V. M.

AU - Nurnberger, John

AU - Schuckit, M. A.

AU - Begleiter, H.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Using data from The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, we compare direct interview diagnoses of alcohol dependence to those obtained by history from family members. Using a requirement of three or more positive implications by history, the specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive values are 98%, 39%, and 45%, respectively. A logistic analysis found the gender of the relative and alcoholism in the informant to be significant, but not the gender of the informant. The partial odds ratio of a diagnosis at interview associated with a positive family history diagnosis was 13.6. The relationship between the informant and relative was significant, with negative reports from an offspring or mate more influential than a negative report from a parent or second-degree relative. We derived a recursive equation to combine a variable number of family history reports, wherein the probabilities associated with a single report are computed from the logistic analysis. This permits the use of family history information both as a proxy for an uninterviewed relative, as well as a second source of information to be used in the analysis of genetic family data.

AB - Using data from The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, we compare direct interview diagnoses of alcohol dependence to those obtained by history from family members. Using a requirement of three or more positive implications by history, the specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive values are 98%, 39%, and 45%, respectively. A logistic analysis found the gender of the relative and alcoholism in the informant to be significant, but not the gender of the informant. The partial odds ratio of a diagnosis at interview associated with a positive family history diagnosis was 13.6. The relationship between the informant and relative was significant, with negative reports from an offspring or mate more influential than a negative report from a parent or second-degree relative. We derived a recursive equation to combine a variable number of family history reports, wherein the probabilities associated with a single report are computed from the logistic analysis. This permits the use of family history information both as a proxy for an uninterviewed relative, as well as a second source of information to be used in the analysis of genetic family data.

KW - DSM-III-R Alcohol Dependence

KW - Family History Diagnoses

KW - Genetic Analysis

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029143219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029143219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb00983.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb00983.x

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1018

EP - 1023

JO - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

JF - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

SN - 0145-6008

IS - 4

ER -