Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models

Nijee Sharma, Kelly Cunningham, Ryan G. Porter, Sam J. Marzo, Kathryn Jones, Eileen M. Foecking

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare functional recovery and motor nerve conduction following a distal extratemporal crush injury of the facial nerve to a more proximal intratemporal crush injury. Study Design: Prospective, controlled animal study. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four experimental groups: 1) extratemporal crush, 2) extratemporal sham-operated, 3) intratemporal crush, and 4) intratemporal sham-operated. Each group had an n of 4-9. The facial nerve was crushed near its exit from the stylomastoid foramen for extratemporal facial nerve injuries and within the facial canal in the temporal bone for intratemporal facial nerve injuries. Recovery times for the return of facial nerve functional parameters were compared between the two injury models. Motor nerve conduction studies were also done weekly to quantify the changes in peak amplitude and latency of evoked response. Results: Rats receiving the extratemporal facial nerve injury recovered full facial function by ∼2 weeks postoperative (wpo) and displayed normal peak amplitude and latency recordings by 4 wpo. In comparison, rats receiving the intratemporal facial nerve injury failed to reach complete functional recovery at the end of 8 wpo. Although latency of evoked response returned to normal by 2 weeks following the intratemporal injury, peak amplitude remained ∼70% below normal at the end of 8 wpo. Conclusions: An intratemporal crush of the facial nerve leads to significantly delayed functional recovery and decreased motor nerve conduction as compared to an extratemporal crush, indicating that the location of injury strongly influences the recovery outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2324-2330
Number of pages7
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume119
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve
Neural Conduction
Reaction Time
Wounds and Injuries
Temporal Bone
Sprague Dawley Rats
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Facial nerve injury
  • Facial paralysis
  • Nerve regeneration
  • Peripheral nerve injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sharma, N., Cunningham, K., Porter, R. G., Marzo, S. J., Jones, K., & Foecking, E. M. (2009). Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models. Laryngoscope, 119(12), 2324-2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20627

Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models. / Sharma, Nijee; Cunningham, Kelly; Porter, Ryan G.; Marzo, Sam J.; Jones, Kathryn; Foecking, Eileen M.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 119, No. 12, 12.2009, p. 2324-2330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sharma, N, Cunningham, K, Porter, RG, Marzo, SJ, Jones, K & Foecking, EM 2009, 'Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models', Laryngoscope, vol. 119, no. 12, pp. 2324-2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20627
Sharma N, Cunningham K, Porter RG, Marzo SJ, Jones K, Foecking EM. Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models. Laryngoscope. 2009 Dec;119(12):2324-2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20627
Sharma, Nijee ; Cunningham, Kelly ; Porter, Ryan G. ; Marzo, Sam J. ; Jones, Kathryn ; Foecking, Eileen M. / Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models. In: Laryngoscope. 2009 ; Vol. 119, No. 12. pp. 2324-2330.
@article{e3f644254d2945118414123fc8551eb5,
title = "Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare functional recovery and motor nerve conduction following a distal extratemporal crush injury of the facial nerve to a more proximal intratemporal crush injury. Study Design: Prospective, controlled animal study. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four experimental groups: 1) extratemporal crush, 2) extratemporal sham-operated, 3) intratemporal crush, and 4) intratemporal sham-operated. Each group had an n of 4-9. The facial nerve was crushed near its exit from the stylomastoid foramen for extratemporal facial nerve injuries and within the facial canal in the temporal bone for intratemporal facial nerve injuries. Recovery times for the return of facial nerve functional parameters were compared between the two injury models. Motor nerve conduction studies were also done weekly to quantify the changes in peak amplitude and latency of evoked response. Results: Rats receiving the extratemporal facial nerve injury recovered full facial function by ∼2 weeks postoperative (wpo) and displayed normal peak amplitude and latency recordings by 4 wpo. In comparison, rats receiving the intratemporal facial nerve injury failed to reach complete functional recovery at the end of 8 wpo. Although latency of evoked response returned to normal by 2 weeks following the intratemporal injury, peak amplitude remained ∼70{\%} below normal at the end of 8 wpo. Conclusions: An intratemporal crush of the facial nerve leads to significantly delayed functional recovery and decreased motor nerve conduction as compared to an extratemporal crush, indicating that the location of injury strongly influences the recovery outcome.",
keywords = "Facial nerve injury, Facial paralysis, Nerve regeneration, Peripheral nerve injury",
author = "Nijee Sharma and Kelly Cunningham and Porter, {Ryan G.} and Marzo, {Sam J.} and Kathryn Jones and Foecking, {Eileen M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/lary.20627",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "2324--2330",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of extratemporal and intratemporal facial nerve injury models

AU - Sharma, Nijee

AU - Cunningham, Kelly

AU - Porter, Ryan G.

AU - Marzo, Sam J.

AU - Jones, Kathryn

AU - Foecking, Eileen M.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare functional recovery and motor nerve conduction following a distal extratemporal crush injury of the facial nerve to a more proximal intratemporal crush injury. Study Design: Prospective, controlled animal study. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four experimental groups: 1) extratemporal crush, 2) extratemporal sham-operated, 3) intratemporal crush, and 4) intratemporal sham-operated. Each group had an n of 4-9. The facial nerve was crushed near its exit from the stylomastoid foramen for extratemporal facial nerve injuries and within the facial canal in the temporal bone for intratemporal facial nerve injuries. Recovery times for the return of facial nerve functional parameters were compared between the two injury models. Motor nerve conduction studies were also done weekly to quantify the changes in peak amplitude and latency of evoked response. Results: Rats receiving the extratemporal facial nerve injury recovered full facial function by ∼2 weeks postoperative (wpo) and displayed normal peak amplitude and latency recordings by 4 wpo. In comparison, rats receiving the intratemporal facial nerve injury failed to reach complete functional recovery at the end of 8 wpo. Although latency of evoked response returned to normal by 2 weeks following the intratemporal injury, peak amplitude remained ∼70% below normal at the end of 8 wpo. Conclusions: An intratemporal crush of the facial nerve leads to significantly delayed functional recovery and decreased motor nerve conduction as compared to an extratemporal crush, indicating that the location of injury strongly influences the recovery outcome.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare functional recovery and motor nerve conduction following a distal extratemporal crush injury of the facial nerve to a more proximal intratemporal crush injury. Study Design: Prospective, controlled animal study. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four experimental groups: 1) extratemporal crush, 2) extratemporal sham-operated, 3) intratemporal crush, and 4) intratemporal sham-operated. Each group had an n of 4-9. The facial nerve was crushed near its exit from the stylomastoid foramen for extratemporal facial nerve injuries and within the facial canal in the temporal bone for intratemporal facial nerve injuries. Recovery times for the return of facial nerve functional parameters were compared between the two injury models. Motor nerve conduction studies were also done weekly to quantify the changes in peak amplitude and latency of evoked response. Results: Rats receiving the extratemporal facial nerve injury recovered full facial function by ∼2 weeks postoperative (wpo) and displayed normal peak amplitude and latency recordings by 4 wpo. In comparison, rats receiving the intratemporal facial nerve injury failed to reach complete functional recovery at the end of 8 wpo. Although latency of evoked response returned to normal by 2 weeks following the intratemporal injury, peak amplitude remained ∼70% below normal at the end of 8 wpo. Conclusions: An intratemporal crush of the facial nerve leads to significantly delayed functional recovery and decreased motor nerve conduction as compared to an extratemporal crush, indicating that the location of injury strongly influences the recovery outcome.

KW - Facial nerve injury

KW - Facial paralysis

KW - Nerve regeneration

KW - Peripheral nerve injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73949091597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73949091597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.20627

DO - 10.1002/lary.20627

M3 - Article

C2 - 19718755

AN - SCOPUS:73949091597

VL - 119

SP - 2324

EP - 2330

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 12

ER -