Comparison of nurses’ self-reported and objectively measured evidence-based practice knowledge

Amy Wonder, Angela M. McNelis, Darrell Spurlock, Pamela M. Ironside, Shelley Lancaster, Carmen R. Davis, Marlena Gainey, Nancy Verwers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study provides a first-time, objective assessment of the evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge of RNs working in Magnet®-designated hospitals. Method: This multisite, cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study uses the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment in Nursing (EKAN) and Evidence- Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ). Results: EBPQ subscale scores revealed overall positive self-ratings of EBP knowledge/skills, attitudes, and practice/ use. EKAN sum scores were not correlated with EBPQ scores (r = .017 to .123, p = not significant). Higher levels of nursing education were associated with higher scores on EKAN and were the only statistically significant predictor of EKAN scores. Conclusion: Nurses’ self-reported EBP knowledge/ skills, attitudes, and practice/use were not statistically significantly correlated with objectively measured EBP knowledge. Direct, objective measurement is recommended as the standard when testing interventions aimed at advancing EBP knowledge, skills, and ability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-70
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Continuing Education in Nursing
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
nurse
Nurses
Nursing Assessment
evidence
nursing
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
questionnaire
Aptitude
Magnets
Nursing Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Review and Exam Preparation

Cite this

Comparison of nurses’ self-reported and objectively measured evidence-based practice knowledge. / Wonder, Amy; McNelis, Angela M.; Spurlock, Darrell; Ironside, Pamela M.; Lancaster, Shelley; Davis, Carmen R.; Gainey, Marlena; Verwers, Nancy.

In: Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 65-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wonder, A, McNelis, AM, Spurlock, D, Ironside, PM, Lancaster, S, Davis, CR, Gainey, M & Verwers, N 2017, 'Comparison of nurses’ self-reported and objectively measured evidence-based practice knowledge', Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 65-70. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20170119-06
Wonder, Amy ; McNelis, Angela M. ; Spurlock, Darrell ; Ironside, Pamela M. ; Lancaster, Shelley ; Davis, Carmen R. ; Gainey, Marlena ; Verwers, Nancy. / Comparison of nurses’ self-reported and objectively measured evidence-based practice knowledge. In: Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2017 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 65-70.
@article{f7737031a8da4ab2a2e5abf578c6a435,
title = "Comparison of nurses’ self-reported and objectively measured evidence-based practice knowledge",
abstract = "Background: This study provides a first-time, objective assessment of the evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge of RNs working in Magnet{\circledR}-designated hospitals. Method: This multisite, cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study uses the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment in Nursing (EKAN) and Evidence- Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ). Results: EBPQ subscale scores revealed overall positive self-ratings of EBP knowledge/skills, attitudes, and practice/ use. EKAN sum scores were not correlated with EBPQ scores (r = .017 to .123, p = not significant). Higher levels of nursing education were associated with higher scores on EKAN and were the only statistically significant predictor of EKAN scores. Conclusion: Nurses’ self-reported EBP knowledge/ skills, attitudes, and practice/use were not statistically significantly correlated with objectively measured EBP knowledge. Direct, objective measurement is recommended as the standard when testing interventions aimed at advancing EBP knowledge, skills, and ability.",
author = "Amy Wonder and McNelis, {Angela M.} and Darrell Spurlock and Ironside, {Pamela M.} and Shelley Lancaster and Davis, {Carmen R.} and Marlena Gainey and Nancy Verwers",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3928/00220124-20170119-06",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "65--70",
journal = "Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing",
issn = "0022-0124",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of nurses’ self-reported and objectively measured evidence-based practice knowledge

AU - Wonder, Amy

AU - McNelis, Angela M.

AU - Spurlock, Darrell

AU - Ironside, Pamela M.

AU - Lancaster, Shelley

AU - Davis, Carmen R.

AU - Gainey, Marlena

AU - Verwers, Nancy

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Background: This study provides a first-time, objective assessment of the evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge of RNs working in Magnet®-designated hospitals. Method: This multisite, cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study uses the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment in Nursing (EKAN) and Evidence- Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ). Results: EBPQ subscale scores revealed overall positive self-ratings of EBP knowledge/skills, attitudes, and practice/ use. EKAN sum scores were not correlated with EBPQ scores (r = .017 to .123, p = not significant). Higher levels of nursing education were associated with higher scores on EKAN and were the only statistically significant predictor of EKAN scores. Conclusion: Nurses’ self-reported EBP knowledge/ skills, attitudes, and practice/use were not statistically significantly correlated with objectively measured EBP knowledge. Direct, objective measurement is recommended as the standard when testing interventions aimed at advancing EBP knowledge, skills, and ability.

AB - Background: This study provides a first-time, objective assessment of the evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge of RNs working in Magnet®-designated hospitals. Method: This multisite, cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study uses the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment in Nursing (EKAN) and Evidence- Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ). Results: EBPQ subscale scores revealed overall positive self-ratings of EBP knowledge/skills, attitudes, and practice/ use. EKAN sum scores were not correlated with EBPQ scores (r = .017 to .123, p = not significant). Higher levels of nursing education were associated with higher scores on EKAN and were the only statistically significant predictor of EKAN scores. Conclusion: Nurses’ self-reported EBP knowledge/ skills, attitudes, and practice/use were not statistically significantly correlated with objectively measured EBP knowledge. Direct, objective measurement is recommended as the standard when testing interventions aimed at advancing EBP knowledge, skills, and ability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012283240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012283240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/00220124-20170119-06

DO - 10.3928/00220124-20170119-06

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing

JF - Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing

SN - 0022-0124

IS - 2

ER -