Comparison of patients' ratings and examination of nurses' responses to pain intensity rating scales

Janet Carpenter, D. Brockopp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients' ratings of pain intensity are an important component of a comprehensive assessment of pain. Although a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) is recommended for quantifying subjective pain intensity, a 0 to 5 paint numerical rating scale (NRS) is commonly used. These two scales are often viewed as interchangeable or mathematically equivalent, with a 2 on a 0 to 5 point scale seen as equal to a 4 on a 10-cm VAS. The purposes of this study were to compare patients' pain ratings on each scale and to examine nurses' responses to mathematically equivalent pain ratings. Results indicated that patients do not rate their pain in a mathematically equivalent way. VAS ratings were lower than NRS ratings, and more than three quarters of patients provided ratings that were not mathematically equivalent. In addition, nurses provided with fictitious patient scenarios did not provide the same pain medication for equivalent ratings and chose smaller analgesic doses in comparison with experts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)292-298
Number of pages7
JournalCancer Nursing
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nurses
Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Paint
Pain Measurement
Analgesics

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Neoplasms
  • Pain
  • Pain measurement
  • Self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Comparison of patients' ratings and examination of nurses' responses to pain intensity rating scales. / Carpenter, Janet; Brockopp, D.

In: Cancer Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1995, p. 292-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34936c1e14544e34a0771e8ddeda8a9d,
title = "Comparison of patients' ratings and examination of nurses' responses to pain intensity rating scales",
abstract = "Patients' ratings of pain intensity are an important component of a comprehensive assessment of pain. Although a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) is recommended for quantifying subjective pain intensity, a 0 to 5 paint numerical rating scale (NRS) is commonly used. These two scales are often viewed as interchangeable or mathematically equivalent, with a 2 on a 0 to 5 point scale seen as equal to a 4 on a 10-cm VAS. The purposes of this study were to compare patients' pain ratings on each scale and to examine nurses' responses to mathematically equivalent pain ratings. Results indicated that patients do not rate their pain in a mathematically equivalent way. VAS ratings were lower than NRS ratings, and more than three quarters of patients provided ratings that were not mathematically equivalent. In addition, nurses provided with fictitious patient scenarios did not provide the same pain medication for equivalent ratings and chose smaller analgesic doses in comparison with experts.",
keywords = "Cancer, Neoplasms, Pain, Pain measurement, Self-report",
author = "Janet Carpenter and D. Brockopp",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "292--298",
journal = "Cancer Nursing",
issn = "0162-220X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of patients' ratings and examination of nurses' responses to pain intensity rating scales

AU - Carpenter, Janet

AU - Brockopp, D.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Patients' ratings of pain intensity are an important component of a comprehensive assessment of pain. Although a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) is recommended for quantifying subjective pain intensity, a 0 to 5 paint numerical rating scale (NRS) is commonly used. These two scales are often viewed as interchangeable or mathematically equivalent, with a 2 on a 0 to 5 point scale seen as equal to a 4 on a 10-cm VAS. The purposes of this study were to compare patients' pain ratings on each scale and to examine nurses' responses to mathematically equivalent pain ratings. Results indicated that patients do not rate their pain in a mathematically equivalent way. VAS ratings were lower than NRS ratings, and more than three quarters of patients provided ratings that were not mathematically equivalent. In addition, nurses provided with fictitious patient scenarios did not provide the same pain medication for equivalent ratings and chose smaller analgesic doses in comparison with experts.

AB - Patients' ratings of pain intensity are an important component of a comprehensive assessment of pain. Although a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) is recommended for quantifying subjective pain intensity, a 0 to 5 paint numerical rating scale (NRS) is commonly used. These two scales are often viewed as interchangeable or mathematically equivalent, with a 2 on a 0 to 5 point scale seen as equal to a 4 on a 10-cm VAS. The purposes of this study were to compare patients' pain ratings on each scale and to examine nurses' responses to mathematically equivalent pain ratings. Results indicated that patients do not rate their pain in a mathematically equivalent way. VAS ratings were lower than NRS ratings, and more than three quarters of patients provided ratings that were not mathematically equivalent. In addition, nurses provided with fictitious patient scenarios did not provide the same pain medication for equivalent ratings and chose smaller analgesic doses in comparison with experts.

KW - Cancer

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Pain

KW - Pain measurement

KW - Self-report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029127334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029127334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7664256

AN - SCOPUS:0029127334

VL - 18

SP - 292

EP - 298

JO - Cancer Nursing

JF - Cancer Nursing

SN - 0162-220X

IS - 4

ER -