Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses from interview reports with those from best-estimate procedures

Kathleen K. Bucholz, John Nurnberger, John R. Kramer, Victor M. Hesselbrock, Marc A. Schuckit, Laura J. Bierut

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare psychiatric diagnoses based on interview information with those based on best-estimate procedures, to evaluate information used in such procedures, and to use 5-year follow-up data to determine whether the best-estimate diagnosis is an improvement over the interview-based diagnosis. Method: Psychiatric diagnoses were based on interview reports from 373 probands and 2,615 relatives participating in a high-risk family study of alcoholism. The diagnosis also included clinician ratings in a best-estimate procedure of this study. Results: Formost diagnoses, both sensitivity and specificity, using the best-estimate diagnosis (BED) as the gold standard, were excellent, in both relatives and probands. Substance abuse was an exception, with very low sensitivity, although specificity rates were excellent. For nonsubstance diagnoses, specificity was high, but sensitivity ranged from 59% to 84% across relatives and probands. In general, BED procedures led to higher prevalence estimates than those from the interview only. In the BED process, family history data were especially useful for conduct and antisocial personality disorders. Follow-up interview data supported the fact that BED procedures led to both enhancements of, as well as errors in, diagnosis. Conclusions: Our data attest to the utility of family history information, particularly for antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder, and indicate that, for the phenotype of substance-dependence disorder, an interview-based diagnosis alone is adequate in classifying individuals with a minimum of error. These results should be reassuring for research studies in which costs and resources required for best-estimate procedures are not affordable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-168
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Studies on Alcohol
Volume67
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Mental Disorders
Interviews
interview
Antisocial Personality Disorder
personality disorder
Substance-Related Disorders
genealogy
Psychiatry
Sensitivity and Specificity
Conduct Disorder
gold standard
Alcoholism
alcoholism
substance abuse
Phenotype
Costs and Cost Analysis
rating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Bucholz, K. K., Nurnberger, J., Kramer, J. R., Hesselbrock, V. M., Schuckit, M. A., & Bierut, L. J. (2006). Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses from interview reports with those from best-estimate procedures. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(1), 157-168.

Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses from interview reports with those from best-estimate procedures. / Bucholz, Kathleen K.; Nurnberger, John; Kramer, John R.; Hesselbrock, Victor M.; Schuckit, Marc A.; Bierut, Laura J.

In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 157-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bucholz, KK, Nurnberger, J, Kramer, JR, Hesselbrock, VM, Schuckit, MA & Bierut, LJ 2006, 'Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses from interview reports with those from best-estimate procedures', Journal of Studies on Alcohol, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 157-168.
Bucholz, Kathleen K. ; Nurnberger, John ; Kramer, John R. ; Hesselbrock, Victor M. ; Schuckit, Marc A. ; Bierut, Laura J. / Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses from interview reports with those from best-estimate procedures. In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2006 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 157-168.
@article{2c758d13805b46499d47f3ab3983ef45,
title = "Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses from interview reports with those from best-estimate procedures",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to compare psychiatric diagnoses based on interview information with those based on best-estimate procedures, to evaluate information used in such procedures, and to use 5-year follow-up data to determine whether the best-estimate diagnosis is an improvement over the interview-based diagnosis. Method: Psychiatric diagnoses were based on interview reports from 373 probands and 2,615 relatives participating in a high-risk family study of alcoholism. The diagnosis also included clinician ratings in a best-estimate procedure of this study. Results: Formost diagnoses, both sensitivity and specificity, using the best-estimate diagnosis (BED) as the gold standard, were excellent, in both relatives and probands. Substance abuse was an exception, with very low sensitivity, although specificity rates were excellent. For nonsubstance diagnoses, specificity was high, but sensitivity ranged from 59{\%} to 84{\%} across relatives and probands. In general, BED procedures led to higher prevalence estimates than those from the interview only. In the BED process, family history data were especially useful for conduct and antisocial personality disorders. Follow-up interview data supported the fact that BED procedures led to both enhancements of, as well as errors in, diagnosis. Conclusions: Our data attest to the utility of family history information, particularly for antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder, and indicate that, for the phenotype of substance-dependence disorder, an interview-based diagnosis alone is adequate in classifying individuals with a minimum of error. These results should be reassuring for research studies in which costs and resources required for best-estimate procedures are not affordable.",
author = "Bucholz, {Kathleen K.} and John Nurnberger and Kramer, {John R.} and Hesselbrock, {Victor M.} and Schuckit, {Marc A.} and Bierut, {Laura J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "157--168",
journal = "Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs",
issn = "1937-1888",
publisher = "Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of psychiatric diagnoses from interview reports with those from best-estimate procedures

AU - Bucholz, Kathleen K.

AU - Nurnberger, John

AU - Kramer, John R.

AU - Hesselbrock, Victor M.

AU - Schuckit, Marc A.

AU - Bierut, Laura J.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare psychiatric diagnoses based on interview information with those based on best-estimate procedures, to evaluate information used in such procedures, and to use 5-year follow-up data to determine whether the best-estimate diagnosis is an improvement over the interview-based diagnosis. Method: Psychiatric diagnoses were based on interview reports from 373 probands and 2,615 relatives participating in a high-risk family study of alcoholism. The diagnosis also included clinician ratings in a best-estimate procedure of this study. Results: Formost diagnoses, both sensitivity and specificity, using the best-estimate diagnosis (BED) as the gold standard, were excellent, in both relatives and probands. Substance abuse was an exception, with very low sensitivity, although specificity rates were excellent. For nonsubstance diagnoses, specificity was high, but sensitivity ranged from 59% to 84% across relatives and probands. In general, BED procedures led to higher prevalence estimates than those from the interview only. In the BED process, family history data were especially useful for conduct and antisocial personality disorders. Follow-up interview data supported the fact that BED procedures led to both enhancements of, as well as errors in, diagnosis. Conclusions: Our data attest to the utility of family history information, particularly for antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder, and indicate that, for the phenotype of substance-dependence disorder, an interview-based diagnosis alone is adequate in classifying individuals with a minimum of error. These results should be reassuring for research studies in which costs and resources required for best-estimate procedures are not affordable.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare psychiatric diagnoses based on interview information with those based on best-estimate procedures, to evaluate information used in such procedures, and to use 5-year follow-up data to determine whether the best-estimate diagnosis is an improvement over the interview-based diagnosis. Method: Psychiatric diagnoses were based on interview reports from 373 probands and 2,615 relatives participating in a high-risk family study of alcoholism. The diagnosis also included clinician ratings in a best-estimate procedure of this study. Results: Formost diagnoses, both sensitivity and specificity, using the best-estimate diagnosis (BED) as the gold standard, were excellent, in both relatives and probands. Substance abuse was an exception, with very low sensitivity, although specificity rates were excellent. For nonsubstance diagnoses, specificity was high, but sensitivity ranged from 59% to 84% across relatives and probands. In general, BED procedures led to higher prevalence estimates than those from the interview only. In the BED process, family history data were especially useful for conduct and antisocial personality disorders. Follow-up interview data supported the fact that BED procedures led to both enhancements of, as well as errors in, diagnosis. Conclusions: Our data attest to the utility of family history information, particularly for antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder, and indicate that, for the phenotype of substance-dependence disorder, an interview-based diagnosis alone is adequate in classifying individuals with a minimum of error. These results should be reassuring for research studies in which costs and resources required for best-estimate procedures are not affordable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30344456673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30344456673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 157

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

SN - 1937-1888

IS - 1

ER -