Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts

Ashesh P. Shah, Daniel P. Milgrom, Richard S. Mangus, John A. Powelson, William C. Goggins, Milgrom L. Milgrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Use of pulsatile perfusion to optimize outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation remains controversial. This study is a retrospective analysis of all cadaveric renal allografts procured locally by our center over a 3-year period. Kidney pairs were identified in which one kidney underwent pulsatile perfusion and transplantation at our center, whereas the contra-lateral kidney underwent cold storage and transplantation at another center. Eighty-eight percent of the exported kidneys were six-antigen matches. Study outcomes included 1-year graft and patient survival, delayed graft function, and need for posttransplant dialysis. Recipients had similar demographic and disease characteristics. Survival for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage were 95% and 88% (graft, P=0.43) and 98% and 90% (patient, P=0.36), respectively. The incidence of delayed graft function was 5% and 35% (P<0.01), whereas posttransplant dialysis was 5% and 30% (P<0.01), for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage, respectively. These data support routine use of pulsatile perfusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1006-1009
Number of pages4
JournalTransplantation
Volume86
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2008

Fingerprint

Pulsatile Flow
Allografts
Kidney
Delayed Graft Function
Dialysis
Transplantation
Graft Survival
Kidney Transplantation
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Tissue Donors
Transplants
Antigens
Survival
Incidence

Keywords

  • Acute tubular necrosis
  • Delayed
  • Graft function
  • Pulsatile perfusion
  • Renal transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Shah, A. P., Milgrom, D. P., Mangus, R. S., Powelson, J. A., Goggins, W. C., & Milgrom, M. L. (2008). Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts. Transplantation, 86(7), 1006-1009. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318187b978

Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts. / Shah, Ashesh P.; Milgrom, Daniel P.; Mangus, Richard S.; Powelson, John A.; Goggins, William C.; Milgrom, Milgrom L.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 86, No. 7, 15.10.2008, p. 1006-1009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shah, AP, Milgrom, DP, Mangus, RS, Powelson, JA, Goggins, WC & Milgrom, ML 2008, 'Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts', Transplantation, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 1006-1009. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318187b978
Shah, Ashesh P. ; Milgrom, Daniel P. ; Mangus, Richard S. ; Powelson, John A. ; Goggins, William C. ; Milgrom, Milgrom L. / Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts. In: Transplantation. 2008 ; Vol. 86, No. 7. pp. 1006-1009.
@article{2a1cd225aade490e9f4bf23dcf4d51d8,
title = "Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts",
abstract = "Use of pulsatile perfusion to optimize outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation remains controversial. This study is a retrospective analysis of all cadaveric renal allografts procured locally by our center over a 3-year period. Kidney pairs were identified in which one kidney underwent pulsatile perfusion and transplantation at our center, whereas the contra-lateral kidney underwent cold storage and transplantation at another center. Eighty-eight percent of the exported kidneys were six-antigen matches. Study outcomes included 1-year graft and patient survival, delayed graft function, and need for posttransplant dialysis. Recipients had similar demographic and disease characteristics. Survival for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage were 95{\%} and 88{\%} (graft, P=0.43) and 98{\%} and 90{\%} (patient, P=0.36), respectively. The incidence of delayed graft function was 5{\%} and 35{\%} (P<0.01), whereas posttransplant dialysis was 5{\%} and 30{\%} (P<0.01), for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage, respectively. These data support routine use of pulsatile perfusion.",
keywords = "Acute tubular necrosis, Delayed, Graft function, Pulsatile perfusion, Renal transplantation",
author = "Shah, {Ashesh P.} and Milgrom, {Daniel P.} and Mangus, {Richard S.} and Powelson, {John A.} and Goggins, {William C.} and Milgrom, {Milgrom L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0b013e318187b978",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "1006--1009",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of pulsatile perfusion and cold storage for paired kidney allografts

AU - Shah, Ashesh P.

AU - Milgrom, Daniel P.

AU - Mangus, Richard S.

AU - Powelson, John A.

AU - Goggins, William C.

AU - Milgrom, Milgrom L.

PY - 2008/10/15

Y1 - 2008/10/15

N2 - Use of pulsatile perfusion to optimize outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation remains controversial. This study is a retrospective analysis of all cadaveric renal allografts procured locally by our center over a 3-year period. Kidney pairs were identified in which one kidney underwent pulsatile perfusion and transplantation at our center, whereas the contra-lateral kidney underwent cold storage and transplantation at another center. Eighty-eight percent of the exported kidneys were six-antigen matches. Study outcomes included 1-year graft and patient survival, delayed graft function, and need for posttransplant dialysis. Recipients had similar demographic and disease characteristics. Survival for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage were 95% and 88% (graft, P=0.43) and 98% and 90% (patient, P=0.36), respectively. The incidence of delayed graft function was 5% and 35% (P<0.01), whereas posttransplant dialysis was 5% and 30% (P<0.01), for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage, respectively. These data support routine use of pulsatile perfusion.

AB - Use of pulsatile perfusion to optimize outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation remains controversial. This study is a retrospective analysis of all cadaveric renal allografts procured locally by our center over a 3-year period. Kidney pairs were identified in which one kidney underwent pulsatile perfusion and transplantation at our center, whereas the contra-lateral kidney underwent cold storage and transplantation at another center. Eighty-eight percent of the exported kidneys were six-antigen matches. Study outcomes included 1-year graft and patient survival, delayed graft function, and need for posttransplant dialysis. Recipients had similar demographic and disease characteristics. Survival for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage were 95% and 88% (graft, P=0.43) and 98% and 90% (patient, P=0.36), respectively. The incidence of delayed graft function was 5% and 35% (P<0.01), whereas posttransplant dialysis was 5% and 30% (P<0.01), for pulsatile perfusion and cold storage, respectively. These data support routine use of pulsatile perfusion.

KW - Acute tubular necrosis

KW - Delayed

KW - Graft function

KW - Pulsatile perfusion

KW - Renal transplantation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56049104916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56049104916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0b013e318187b978

DO - 10.1097/TP.0b013e318187b978

M3 - Article

C2 - 18852670

AN - SCOPUS:56049104916

VL - 86

SP - 1006

EP - 1009

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 7

ER -