Comparison of submuscular and open plating of pediatric femur fractures

A retrospective review

Matthew D. Abbott, Randall Loder, Jeffrey O. Anglen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plate osteosynthesis is an accepted method of treatment of pediatric femur fractures. Historically, open plating has been used. Submuscular bridge plating has gained recent popularity due to the theoretical advantages of decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, and decreased risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare submuscular bridge plating to open plating of pediatric femur fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients (80 treated femur fractures) between 1999 and 2011 that underwent either open plating (58 femur fractures) or submuscular bridge plating (22 femur fractures). The outcome measures evaluated were operative time, estimated blood loss, malunion, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, and length of hospital stay after surgery. RESULTS: Among our outcome measures, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, or length of hospital stay after surgery. There was greater estimated blood loss in the open plating group (P≤0.0001) and greater rotational asymmetry in the submuscular bridge plating group (P=0.005). There was a trend of increased unplanned return to the operating room in the open plating group (5/58 vs. 0/22) although not statistically significant (P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Submuscular bridge plating and open plating seem to be equally viable options for the management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures. In this study, open plating had an increase in estimated blood loss and a trend of more unplanned returns to the operating room, whereas submuscular bridge plating had an increase in asymptomatic rotational asymmetry. Further larger, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to further evaluate these operative techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)519-523
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Femur
Pediatrics
Length of Stay
Operating Rooms
Operative Time
Leg
Infection
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Open plating
  • Pediatric femur fracture
  • Pediatric trauma
  • Submuscular bridge plating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of submuscular and open plating of pediatric femur fractures : A retrospective review. / Abbott, Matthew D.; Loder, Randall; Anglen, Jeffrey O.

In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vol. 33, No. 5, 07.2013, p. 519-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29ca1a72d4524956996340dfb35981c9,
title = "Comparison of submuscular and open plating of pediatric femur fractures: A retrospective review",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Plate osteosynthesis is an accepted method of treatment of pediatric femur fractures. Historically, open plating has been used. Submuscular bridge plating has gained recent popularity due to the theoretical advantages of decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, and decreased risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare submuscular bridge plating to open plating of pediatric femur fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients (80 treated femur fractures) between 1999 and 2011 that underwent either open plating (58 femur fractures) or submuscular bridge plating (22 femur fractures). The outcome measures evaluated were operative time, estimated blood loss, malunion, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, and length of hospital stay after surgery. RESULTS: Among our outcome measures, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, or length of hospital stay after surgery. There was greater estimated blood loss in the open plating group (P≤0.0001) and greater rotational asymmetry in the submuscular bridge plating group (P=0.005). There was a trend of increased unplanned return to the operating room in the open plating group (5/58 vs. 0/22) although not statistically significant (P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Submuscular bridge plating and open plating seem to be equally viable options for the management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures. In this study, open plating had an increase in estimated blood loss and a trend of more unplanned returns to the operating room, whereas submuscular bridge plating had an increase in asymptomatic rotational asymmetry. Further larger, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to further evaluate these operative techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.",
keywords = "Open plating, Pediatric femur fracture, Pediatric trauma, Submuscular bridge plating",
author = "Abbott, {Matthew D.} and Randall Loder and Anglen, {Jeffrey O.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/BPO.0b013e318287056d",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "519--523",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics",
issn = "0271-6798",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of submuscular and open plating of pediatric femur fractures

T2 - A retrospective review

AU - Abbott, Matthew D.

AU - Loder, Randall

AU - Anglen, Jeffrey O.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: Plate osteosynthesis is an accepted method of treatment of pediatric femur fractures. Historically, open plating has been used. Submuscular bridge plating has gained recent popularity due to the theoretical advantages of decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, and decreased risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare submuscular bridge plating to open plating of pediatric femur fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients (80 treated femur fractures) between 1999 and 2011 that underwent either open plating (58 femur fractures) or submuscular bridge plating (22 femur fractures). The outcome measures evaluated were operative time, estimated blood loss, malunion, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, and length of hospital stay after surgery. RESULTS: Among our outcome measures, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, or length of hospital stay after surgery. There was greater estimated blood loss in the open plating group (P≤0.0001) and greater rotational asymmetry in the submuscular bridge plating group (P=0.005). There was a trend of increased unplanned return to the operating room in the open plating group (5/58 vs. 0/22) although not statistically significant (P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Submuscular bridge plating and open plating seem to be equally viable options for the management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures. In this study, open plating had an increase in estimated blood loss and a trend of more unplanned returns to the operating room, whereas submuscular bridge plating had an increase in asymptomatic rotational asymmetry. Further larger, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to further evaluate these operative techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

AB - BACKGROUND: Plate osteosynthesis is an accepted method of treatment of pediatric femur fractures. Historically, open plating has been used. Submuscular bridge plating has gained recent popularity due to the theoretical advantages of decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, and decreased risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare submuscular bridge plating to open plating of pediatric femur fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients (80 treated femur fractures) between 1999 and 2011 that underwent either open plating (58 femur fractures) or submuscular bridge plating (22 femur fractures). The outcome measures evaluated were operative time, estimated blood loss, malunion, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, and length of hospital stay after surgery. RESULTS: Among our outcome measures, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, leg length discrepancy, time to union, infection, or length of hospital stay after surgery. There was greater estimated blood loss in the open plating group (P≤0.0001) and greater rotational asymmetry in the submuscular bridge plating group (P=0.005). There was a trend of increased unplanned return to the operating room in the open plating group (5/58 vs. 0/22) although not statistically significant (P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Submuscular bridge plating and open plating seem to be equally viable options for the management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures. In this study, open plating had an increase in estimated blood loss and a trend of more unplanned returns to the operating room, whereas submuscular bridge plating had an increase in asymptomatic rotational asymmetry. Further larger, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to further evaluate these operative techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

KW - Open plating

KW - Pediatric femur fracture

KW - Pediatric trauma

KW - Submuscular bridge plating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879855523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879855523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318287056d

DO - 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318287056d

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 519

EP - 523

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

SN - 0271-6798

IS - 5

ER -