Complex Robotic Lower Urinary Tract Surgery in Patients with History of Open Surgery

Patricio C. Gargollo, Candace Granberg, Edward Gong, Duong Tu, Benjamin Whittam, Daniel Dajusta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe our experience with robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with a history of open abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with any previous open abdominal surgery undergoing robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction were included. Complex lower urinary tract reconstruction was defined as bladder neck reconstruction or continent catheterizable conduits or both, redo surgery at the bladder neck for persistent incontinence or any of these procedures with creation of a Malone antegrade continence enema. Ureteral and renal surgeries were excluded. Patient demographics, surgery performed, operative techniques, operative times and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 21 had undergone multiple laparotomies for ventriculoperitoneal shunt revision, 14 had undergone laparotomy with other adjunct procedures and 1 had undergone laparotomy with colostomy. No access injury occurred and there were 5 conversions. Mean operative time was 8.2 hours (range 4 to 12) and mean length of hospital stay was 74.9 hours (23 to 216). The first 18 cases took longer than the last 18 cases (mean 9.1 vs 7.5 hours, p = 0.002). Patients with multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates (p = 0.01) and longer mean operative times (p = 0.002). Patients with a history of multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions also had longer hospital stays (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with previous open abdominal surgery is safe and feasible. Longer operative times should be expected early in the experience of a surgeon. Patients with multiple prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates and longer operative times compared to those with other indications for prior surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-168
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of Urology
Volume201
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Robotics
Urinary Tract
Operative Time
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
Laparotomy
Length of Stay
Urinary Bladder
Colostomy
Enema
Demography
Kidney
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Complex Robotic Lower Urinary Tract Surgery in Patients with History of Open Surgery. / Gargollo, Patricio C.; Granberg, Candace; Gong, Edward; Tu, Duong; Whittam, Benjamin; Dajusta, Daniel.

In: The Journal of Urology, Vol. 201, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 162-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gargollo, Patricio C. ; Granberg, Candace ; Gong, Edward ; Tu, Duong ; Whittam, Benjamin ; Dajusta, Daniel. / Complex Robotic Lower Urinary Tract Surgery in Patients with History of Open Surgery. In: The Journal of Urology. 2019 ; Vol. 201, No. 1. pp. 162-168.
@article{fc116fb213b44fdea66382491681d100,
title = "Complex Robotic Lower Urinary Tract Surgery in Patients with History of Open Surgery",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We describe our experience with robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with a history of open abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with any previous open abdominal surgery undergoing robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction were included. Complex lower urinary tract reconstruction was defined as bladder neck reconstruction or continent catheterizable conduits or both, redo surgery at the bladder neck for persistent incontinence or any of these procedures with creation of a Malone antegrade continence enema. Ureteral and renal surgeries were excluded. Patient demographics, surgery performed, operative techniques, operative times and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 21 had undergone multiple laparotomies for ventriculoperitoneal shunt revision, 14 had undergone laparotomy with other adjunct procedures and 1 had undergone laparotomy with colostomy. No access injury occurred and there were 5 conversions. Mean operative time was 8.2 hours (range 4 to 12) and mean length of hospital stay was 74.9 hours (23 to 216). The first 18 cases took longer than the last 18 cases (mean 9.1 vs 7.5 hours, p = 0.002). Patients with multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates (p = 0.01) and longer mean operative times (p = 0.002). Patients with a history of multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions also had longer hospital stays (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with previous open abdominal surgery is safe and feasible. Longer operative times should be expected early in the experience of a surgeon. Patients with multiple prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates and longer operative times compared to those with other indications for prior surgery.",
author = "Gargollo, {Patricio C.} and Candace Granberg and Edward Gong and Duong Tu and Benjamin Whittam and Daniel Dajusta",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "201",
pages = "162--168",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complex Robotic Lower Urinary Tract Surgery in Patients with History of Open Surgery

AU - Gargollo, Patricio C.

AU - Granberg, Candace

AU - Gong, Edward

AU - Tu, Duong

AU - Whittam, Benjamin

AU - Dajusta, Daniel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: We describe our experience with robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with a history of open abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with any previous open abdominal surgery undergoing robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction were included. Complex lower urinary tract reconstruction was defined as bladder neck reconstruction or continent catheterizable conduits or both, redo surgery at the bladder neck for persistent incontinence or any of these procedures with creation of a Malone antegrade continence enema. Ureteral and renal surgeries were excluded. Patient demographics, surgery performed, operative techniques, operative times and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 21 had undergone multiple laparotomies for ventriculoperitoneal shunt revision, 14 had undergone laparotomy with other adjunct procedures and 1 had undergone laparotomy with colostomy. No access injury occurred and there were 5 conversions. Mean operative time was 8.2 hours (range 4 to 12) and mean length of hospital stay was 74.9 hours (23 to 216). The first 18 cases took longer than the last 18 cases (mean 9.1 vs 7.5 hours, p = 0.002). Patients with multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates (p = 0.01) and longer mean operative times (p = 0.002). Patients with a history of multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions also had longer hospital stays (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with previous open abdominal surgery is safe and feasible. Longer operative times should be expected early in the experience of a surgeon. Patients with multiple prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates and longer operative times compared to those with other indications for prior surgery.

AB - PURPOSE: We describe our experience with robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with a history of open abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with any previous open abdominal surgery undergoing robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction were included. Complex lower urinary tract reconstruction was defined as bladder neck reconstruction or continent catheterizable conduits or both, redo surgery at the bladder neck for persistent incontinence or any of these procedures with creation of a Malone antegrade continence enema. Ureteral and renal surgeries were excluded. Patient demographics, surgery performed, operative techniques, operative times and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 21 had undergone multiple laparotomies for ventriculoperitoneal shunt revision, 14 had undergone laparotomy with other adjunct procedures and 1 had undergone laparotomy with colostomy. No access injury occurred and there were 5 conversions. Mean operative time was 8.2 hours (range 4 to 12) and mean length of hospital stay was 74.9 hours (23 to 216). The first 18 cases took longer than the last 18 cases (mean 9.1 vs 7.5 hours, p = 0.002). Patients with multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates (p = 0.01) and longer mean operative times (p = 0.002). Patients with a history of multiple ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions also had longer hospital stays (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted complex lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with previous open abdominal surgery is safe and feasible. Longer operative times should be expected early in the experience of a surgeon. Patients with multiple prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions had higher conversion rates and longer operative times compared to those with other indications for prior surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059241887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059241887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.017

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.017

M3 - Article

VL - 201

SP - 162

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -