Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times

J. V. Ralston, D. B. Pisoni, S. E. Lively, B. G. Greene, J. W. Mullennix

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous comprehension studies using postperceptual memory tests have often reported negligible differences in performance between natural speech and several kinds of synthetic speech produced by rule, despite large differences in segmental intelligibility. The present experiments investigated the comprehension of natural and synthetic speech using two different on-line tasks: word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening. On-line task performance was slower and less accurate for passages of synthetic speech than for passages of natural speech. Recognition memory performance in both experiments was less accurate following passages of synthetic speech than of natural speech. Monitoring performance, sentence listening times, and recognition memory accuracy all showed moderate correlations with intelligibility scores obtained using the Modified Rhyme Test. The results suggest that poorer comprehension of passages of synthetic speech is attributable in part to the greater encoding demands of synthetic speech. In contrast to earlier studies, the present results demonstrate that on-line tasks can be used to measure differences in comprehension performance between natural and synthetic speech.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-491
Number of pages21
JournalHuman Factors
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

comprehension
monitoring
Monitoring
Data storage equipment
performance
time
performance monitoring
experiment
Task Performance and Analysis
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule : Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times. / Ralston, J. V.; Pisoni, D. B.; Lively, S. E.; Greene, B. G.; Mullennix, J. W.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.01.1991, p. 471-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ralston, J. V. ; Pisoni, D. B. ; Lively, S. E. ; Greene, B. G. ; Mullennix, J. W. / Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule : Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times. In: Human Factors. 1991 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 471-491.
@article{414f538ef9734773a4ae2e6c92a29fcb,
title = "Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times",
abstract = "Previous comprehension studies using postperceptual memory tests have often reported negligible differences in performance between natural speech and several kinds of synthetic speech produced by rule, despite large differences in segmental intelligibility. The present experiments investigated the comprehension of natural and synthetic speech using two different on-line tasks: word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening. On-line task performance was slower and less accurate for passages of synthetic speech than for passages of natural speech. Recognition memory performance in both experiments was less accurate following passages of synthetic speech than of natural speech. Monitoring performance, sentence listening times, and recognition memory accuracy all showed moderate correlations with intelligibility scores obtained using the Modified Rhyme Test. The results suggest that poorer comprehension of passages of synthetic speech is attributable in part to the greater encoding demands of synthetic speech. In contrast to earlier studies, the present results demonstrate that on-line tasks can be used to measure differences in comprehension performance between natural and synthetic speech.",
author = "Ralston, {J. V.} and Pisoni, {D. B.} and Lively, {S. E.} and Greene, {B. G.} and Mullennix, {J. W.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/001872089103300408",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "471--491",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule

T2 - Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times

AU - Ralston, J. V.

AU - Pisoni, D. B.

AU - Lively, S. E.

AU - Greene, B. G.

AU - Mullennix, J. W.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Previous comprehension studies using postperceptual memory tests have often reported negligible differences in performance between natural speech and several kinds of synthetic speech produced by rule, despite large differences in segmental intelligibility. The present experiments investigated the comprehension of natural and synthetic speech using two different on-line tasks: word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening. On-line task performance was slower and less accurate for passages of synthetic speech than for passages of natural speech. Recognition memory performance in both experiments was less accurate following passages of synthetic speech than of natural speech. Monitoring performance, sentence listening times, and recognition memory accuracy all showed moderate correlations with intelligibility scores obtained using the Modified Rhyme Test. The results suggest that poorer comprehension of passages of synthetic speech is attributable in part to the greater encoding demands of synthetic speech. In contrast to earlier studies, the present results demonstrate that on-line tasks can be used to measure differences in comprehension performance between natural and synthetic speech.

AB - Previous comprehension studies using postperceptual memory tests have often reported negligible differences in performance between natural speech and several kinds of synthetic speech produced by rule, despite large differences in segmental intelligibility. The present experiments investigated the comprehension of natural and synthetic speech using two different on-line tasks: word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening. On-line task performance was slower and less accurate for passages of synthetic speech than for passages of natural speech. Recognition memory performance in both experiments was less accurate following passages of synthetic speech than of natural speech. Monitoring performance, sentence listening times, and recognition memory accuracy all showed moderate correlations with intelligibility scores obtained using the Modified Rhyme Test. The results suggest that poorer comprehension of passages of synthetic speech is attributable in part to the greater encoding demands of synthetic speech. In contrast to earlier studies, the present results demonstrate that on-line tasks can be used to measure differences in comprehension performance between natural and synthetic speech.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026210879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026210879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001872089103300408

DO - 10.1177/001872089103300408

M3 - Article

C2 - 1835449

AN - SCOPUS:0026210879

VL - 33

SP - 471

EP - 491

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 4

ER -