Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning

Indra J. Das, Chee Wai Cheng, Minsong Cao, Peter A S Johnstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media (such as a patient' body) with the help of tissue characterization based on computed tomography (CT) number. However, CT number depends on the type of scanner, tube voltage, field of view (FOV), reconstruction algorithm including artifact reduction and processing filters. The impact of these parameters on CT to electron density (ED) conversion had been subject of investigation for treatment planning in various clinical situations. This is usually performed with a tissue characterization phantom with various density plugs acquired with different tube voltages (kilovoltage peak), FOV reconstruction and different scanners to generate CT number to ED tables. This article provides an overview of inhomogeneity correction in the context of CT scanning and a new evaluation tool, difference volume dose-volume histogram (DVH), dV-DVH. It has been concluded that scanner and CT parameters are important for tissue characterizations, but changes in ED are minimal and only pronounced for higher density materials. For lungs, changes in CT number are minimal among scanners and CT parameters. Dosimetric differences for lung and prostate cases are usually insignificant (

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-11
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Medical Physics
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Tomography
Radiation
X-Ray Computed Tomography Scanners
Electron Microscope Tomography
Electrons
Therapeutics
Lung
Artifacts
Prostate

Keywords

  • Computed tomography artifact
  • computed tomography number
  • electron density
  • treatment planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning. / Das, Indra J.; Cheng, Chee Wai; Cao, Minsong; Johnstone, Peter A S.

In: Journal of Medical Physics, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 3-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Das, Indra J. ; Cheng, Chee Wai ; Cao, Minsong ; Johnstone, Peter A S. / Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning. In: Journal of Medical Physics. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 3-11.
@article{35b40fb8e3af40a387af3ba2c464a57a,
title = "Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning",
abstract = "Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media (such as a patient' body) with the help of tissue characterization based on computed tomography (CT) number. However, CT number depends on the type of scanner, tube voltage, field of view (FOV), reconstruction algorithm including artifact reduction and processing filters. The impact of these parameters on CT to electron density (ED) conversion had been subject of investigation for treatment planning in various clinical situations. This is usually performed with a tissue characterization phantom with various density plugs acquired with different tube voltages (kilovoltage peak), FOV reconstruction and different scanners to generate CT number to ED tables. This article provides an overview of inhomogeneity correction in the context of CT scanning and a new evaluation tool, difference volume dose-volume histogram (DVH), dV-DVH. It has been concluded that scanner and CT parameters are important for tissue characterizations, but changes in ED are minimal and only pronounced for higher density materials. For lungs, changes in CT number are minimal among scanners and CT parameters. Dosimetric differences for lung and prostate cases are usually insignificant (",
keywords = "Computed tomography artifact, computed tomography number, electron density, treatment planning",
author = "Das, {Indra J.} and Cheng, {Chee Wai} and Minsong Cao and Johnstone, {Peter A S}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0971-6203.177277",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "3--11",
journal = "Journal of Medical Physics",
issn = "0971-6203",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning

AU - Das, Indra J.

AU - Cheng, Chee Wai

AU - Cao, Minsong

AU - Johnstone, Peter A S

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media (such as a patient' body) with the help of tissue characterization based on computed tomography (CT) number. However, CT number depends on the type of scanner, tube voltage, field of view (FOV), reconstruction algorithm including artifact reduction and processing filters. The impact of these parameters on CT to electron density (ED) conversion had been subject of investigation for treatment planning in various clinical situations. This is usually performed with a tissue characterization phantom with various density plugs acquired with different tube voltages (kilovoltage peak), FOV reconstruction and different scanners to generate CT number to ED tables. This article provides an overview of inhomogeneity correction in the context of CT scanning and a new evaluation tool, difference volume dose-volume histogram (DVH), dV-DVH. It has been concluded that scanner and CT parameters are important for tissue characterizations, but changes in ED are minimal and only pronounced for higher density materials. For lungs, changes in CT number are minimal among scanners and CT parameters. Dosimetric differences for lung and prostate cases are usually insignificant (

AB - Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media (such as a patient' body) with the help of tissue characterization based on computed tomography (CT) number. However, CT number depends on the type of scanner, tube voltage, field of view (FOV), reconstruction algorithm including artifact reduction and processing filters. The impact of these parameters on CT to electron density (ED) conversion had been subject of investigation for treatment planning in various clinical situations. This is usually performed with a tissue characterization phantom with various density plugs acquired with different tube voltages (kilovoltage peak), FOV reconstruction and different scanners to generate CT number to ED tables. This article provides an overview of inhomogeneity correction in the context of CT scanning and a new evaluation tool, difference volume dose-volume histogram (DVH), dV-DVH. It has been concluded that scanner and CT parameters are important for tissue characterizations, but changes in ED are minimal and only pronounced for higher density materials. For lungs, changes in CT number are minimal among scanners and CT parameters. Dosimetric differences for lung and prostate cases are usually insignificant (

KW - Computed tomography artifact

KW - computed tomography number

KW - electron density

KW - treatment planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960193940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960193940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0971-6203.177277

DO - 10.4103/0971-6203.177277

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84960193940

VL - 41

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Medical Physics

SN - 0971-6203

IS - 1

ER -