Conceptualizing and advancing research networking systems

Titus Schleyer, Brian S. Butler, Mei Song, Heiko Spallek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Science in general, and biomedical research in particular, is becoming more collaborative. As a result, collaboration with the right individuals, teams, and institutions is increasingly crucial for scientific progress. We propose Research Networking Systems (RNS) as a new type of system designed to help scientists identify and choose collaborators, and suggest a corresponding research agenda. The research agenda covers four areas: foundations, presentation, architecture, and evaluation. Foundations includes project-, institutionand discipline-specific motivational factors; the role of social networks; and impression formation based on information beyond expertise and interests. Presentation addresses representing expertise in a comprehensive and up-to-date manner; the role of controlled vocabularies and folksonomies; the tension between seekers' need for comprehensive information and potential collaborators' desire to control how they are seen by others; and the need to support serendipitous discovery of collaborative opportunities. Architecture considers aggregation and synthesis of information from multiple sources, social system interoperability, and integration with the user's primary work context. Lastly, evaluation focuses on assessment of collaboration decisions, measurement of user-specific costs and benefits, and how the large-scale impact of RNS could be evaluated with longitudinal and naturalistic methods. We hope that this article stimulates the humancomputer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, and related communities to pursue a broad and comprehensive agenda for developing research networking systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2
JournalACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computer supported cooperative work
Thesauri
Interoperability
Agglomeration
Costs

Keywords

  • Online knowledge communities
  • Social networks
  • Social software
  • Web 2.0
  • Web 2.0 applications
  • Web collaborative software

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction

Cite this

Conceptualizing and advancing research networking systems. / Schleyer, Titus; Butler, Brian S.; Song, Mei; Spallek, Heiko.

In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2, 03.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schleyer, Titus ; Butler, Brian S. ; Song, Mei ; Spallek, Heiko. / Conceptualizing and advancing research networking systems. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 1.
@article{099b5950bec045b7ac5af77cd8a44aac,
title = "Conceptualizing and advancing research networking systems",
abstract = "Science in general, and biomedical research in particular, is becoming more collaborative. As a result, collaboration with the right individuals, teams, and institutions is increasingly crucial for scientific progress. We propose Research Networking Systems (RNS) as a new type of system designed to help scientists identify and choose collaborators, and suggest a corresponding research agenda. The research agenda covers four areas: foundations, presentation, architecture, and evaluation. Foundations includes project-, institutionand discipline-specific motivational factors; the role of social networks; and impression formation based on information beyond expertise and interests. Presentation addresses representing expertise in a comprehensive and up-to-date manner; the role of controlled vocabularies and folksonomies; the tension between seekers' need for comprehensive information and potential collaborators' desire to control how they are seen by others; and the need to support serendipitous discovery of collaborative opportunities. Architecture considers aggregation and synthesis of information from multiple sources, social system interoperability, and integration with the user's primary work context. Lastly, evaluation focuses on assessment of collaboration decisions, measurement of user-specific costs and benefits, and how the large-scale impact of RNS could be evaluated with longitudinal and naturalistic methods. We hope that this article stimulates the humancomputer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, and related communities to pursue a broad and comprehensive agenda for developing research networking systems.",
keywords = "Online knowledge communities, Social networks, Social software, Web 2.0, Web 2.0 applications, Web collaborative software",
author = "Titus Schleyer and Butler, {Brian S.} and Mei Song and Heiko Spallek",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1145/2147783.2147785",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction",
issn = "1073-0516",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing and advancing research networking systems

AU - Schleyer, Titus

AU - Butler, Brian S.

AU - Song, Mei

AU - Spallek, Heiko

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Science in general, and biomedical research in particular, is becoming more collaborative. As a result, collaboration with the right individuals, teams, and institutions is increasingly crucial for scientific progress. We propose Research Networking Systems (RNS) as a new type of system designed to help scientists identify and choose collaborators, and suggest a corresponding research agenda. The research agenda covers four areas: foundations, presentation, architecture, and evaluation. Foundations includes project-, institutionand discipline-specific motivational factors; the role of social networks; and impression formation based on information beyond expertise and interests. Presentation addresses representing expertise in a comprehensive and up-to-date manner; the role of controlled vocabularies and folksonomies; the tension between seekers' need for comprehensive information and potential collaborators' desire to control how they are seen by others; and the need to support serendipitous discovery of collaborative opportunities. Architecture considers aggregation and synthesis of information from multiple sources, social system interoperability, and integration with the user's primary work context. Lastly, evaluation focuses on assessment of collaboration decisions, measurement of user-specific costs and benefits, and how the large-scale impact of RNS could be evaluated with longitudinal and naturalistic methods. We hope that this article stimulates the humancomputer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, and related communities to pursue a broad and comprehensive agenda for developing research networking systems.

AB - Science in general, and biomedical research in particular, is becoming more collaborative. As a result, collaboration with the right individuals, teams, and institutions is increasingly crucial for scientific progress. We propose Research Networking Systems (RNS) as a new type of system designed to help scientists identify and choose collaborators, and suggest a corresponding research agenda. The research agenda covers four areas: foundations, presentation, architecture, and evaluation. Foundations includes project-, institutionand discipline-specific motivational factors; the role of social networks; and impression formation based on information beyond expertise and interests. Presentation addresses representing expertise in a comprehensive and up-to-date manner; the role of controlled vocabularies and folksonomies; the tension between seekers' need for comprehensive information and potential collaborators' desire to control how they are seen by others; and the need to support serendipitous discovery of collaborative opportunities. Architecture considers aggregation and synthesis of information from multiple sources, social system interoperability, and integration with the user's primary work context. Lastly, evaluation focuses on assessment of collaboration decisions, measurement of user-specific costs and benefits, and how the large-scale impact of RNS could be evaluated with longitudinal and naturalistic methods. We hope that this article stimulates the humancomputer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, and related communities to pursue a broad and comprehensive agenda for developing research networking systems.

KW - Online knowledge communities

KW - Social networks

KW - Social software

KW - Web 2.0

KW - Web 2.0 applications

KW - Web collaborative software

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859732364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859732364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2147783.2147785

DO - 10.1145/2147783.2147785

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

JF - ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

SN - 1073-0516

IS - 1

M1 - 2

ER -