Concordance between the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 in depressed primary care patients

Pamela W. Lee, Herbert C. Schulberg, Patrick J. Raue, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Two instruments commonly used in primary care research to measure depressive severity are the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 (HSCL-20). However, there is little information regarding the relationship between clinical information derived from these scales. The present study investigates the psychometric properties of the PHQ-9 and HSCL-20, determines the degree of instrument concordance, and describes the factor structure of the HSCL-20. Methods: A secondary data analysis from a randomized controlled trial was performed. A total of 405 primary care patients with major depressive disorder and/or dysthymia were administered the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 when recruited for the study. Results: Good internal consistency reliability estimates were obtained for both scales (PHQ-9 α = 0.803; HSCL-20 α = 0.837). All PHQ-9 inter-item and corrected item-total correlations showed that no item detracted from overall scale functioning. HSCL-20 items assessing overeating, poor appetite, and sexual interest were poorly correlated with other items and with the total scale score. A positive, moderate strength relationship was found between the instruments (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Exploratory factor analysis of the HSCL-20 yielded a six-factor structure, which accounted for almost 63% of the variance in total score. The largest contribution to common variance in the scale was provided by an "anxiety and self-reproach" factor. Conclusions: PHQ-9 and HSCL-20 total scores were moderately correlated. Although the HSCL-20 is utilized as a measure of depression severity, it may lack sufficient specificity to be an accurate reflection of depression status per se.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-145
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume99
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Checklist
Primary Health Care
Health
Depression
Surveys and Questionnaires
Hyperphagia
Major Depressive Disorder
Appetite
Psychometrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Anxiety
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Depression
  • Primary care
  • Psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neurology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Concordance between the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 in depressed primary care patients. / Lee, Pamela W.; Schulberg, Herbert C.; Raue, Patrick J.; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 99, No. 1-3, 04.2007, p. 139-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Pamela W. ; Schulberg, Herbert C. ; Raue, Patrick J. ; Kroenke, Kurt. / Concordance between the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 in depressed primary care patients. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2007 ; Vol. 99, No. 1-3. pp. 139-145.
@article{2d81d77014fd42b0abe9de0242c31389,
title = "Concordance between the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 in depressed primary care patients",
abstract = "Background: Two instruments commonly used in primary care research to measure depressive severity are the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 (HSCL-20). However, there is little information regarding the relationship between clinical information derived from these scales. The present study investigates the psychometric properties of the PHQ-9 and HSCL-20, determines the degree of instrument concordance, and describes the factor structure of the HSCL-20. Methods: A secondary data analysis from a randomized controlled trial was performed. A total of 405 primary care patients with major depressive disorder and/or dysthymia were administered the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 when recruited for the study. Results: Good internal consistency reliability estimates were obtained for both scales (PHQ-9 α = 0.803; HSCL-20 α = 0.837). All PHQ-9 inter-item and corrected item-total correlations showed that no item detracted from overall scale functioning. HSCL-20 items assessing overeating, poor appetite, and sexual interest were poorly correlated with other items and with the total scale score. A positive, moderate strength relationship was found between the instruments (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Exploratory factor analysis of the HSCL-20 yielded a six-factor structure, which accounted for almost 63{\%} of the variance in total score. The largest contribution to common variance in the scale was provided by an {"}anxiety and self-reproach{"} factor. Conclusions: PHQ-9 and HSCL-20 total scores were moderately correlated. Although the HSCL-20 is utilized as a measure of depression severity, it may lack sufficient specificity to be an accurate reflection of depression status per se.",
keywords = "Assessment, Depression, Primary care, Psychometrics",
author = "Lee, {Pamela W.} and Schulberg, {Herbert C.} and Raue, {Patrick J.} and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "139--145",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concordance between the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 in depressed primary care patients

AU - Lee, Pamela W.

AU - Schulberg, Herbert C.

AU - Raue, Patrick J.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Background: Two instruments commonly used in primary care research to measure depressive severity are the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 (HSCL-20). However, there is little information regarding the relationship between clinical information derived from these scales. The present study investigates the psychometric properties of the PHQ-9 and HSCL-20, determines the degree of instrument concordance, and describes the factor structure of the HSCL-20. Methods: A secondary data analysis from a randomized controlled trial was performed. A total of 405 primary care patients with major depressive disorder and/or dysthymia were administered the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 when recruited for the study. Results: Good internal consistency reliability estimates were obtained for both scales (PHQ-9 α = 0.803; HSCL-20 α = 0.837). All PHQ-9 inter-item and corrected item-total correlations showed that no item detracted from overall scale functioning. HSCL-20 items assessing overeating, poor appetite, and sexual interest were poorly correlated with other items and with the total scale score. A positive, moderate strength relationship was found between the instruments (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Exploratory factor analysis of the HSCL-20 yielded a six-factor structure, which accounted for almost 63% of the variance in total score. The largest contribution to common variance in the scale was provided by an "anxiety and self-reproach" factor. Conclusions: PHQ-9 and HSCL-20 total scores were moderately correlated. Although the HSCL-20 is utilized as a measure of depression severity, it may lack sufficient specificity to be an accurate reflection of depression status per se.

AB - Background: Two instruments commonly used in primary care research to measure depressive severity are the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 (HSCL-20). However, there is little information regarding the relationship between clinical information derived from these scales. The present study investigates the psychometric properties of the PHQ-9 and HSCL-20, determines the degree of instrument concordance, and describes the factor structure of the HSCL-20. Methods: A secondary data analysis from a randomized controlled trial was performed. A total of 405 primary care patients with major depressive disorder and/or dysthymia were administered the PHQ-9 and the HSCL-20 when recruited for the study. Results: Good internal consistency reliability estimates were obtained for both scales (PHQ-9 α = 0.803; HSCL-20 α = 0.837). All PHQ-9 inter-item and corrected item-total correlations showed that no item detracted from overall scale functioning. HSCL-20 items assessing overeating, poor appetite, and sexual interest were poorly correlated with other items and with the total scale score. A positive, moderate strength relationship was found between the instruments (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Exploratory factor analysis of the HSCL-20 yielded a six-factor structure, which accounted for almost 63% of the variance in total score. The largest contribution to common variance in the scale was provided by an "anxiety and self-reproach" factor. Conclusions: PHQ-9 and HSCL-20 total scores were moderately correlated. Although the HSCL-20 is utilized as a measure of depression severity, it may lack sufficient specificity to be an accurate reflection of depression status per se.

KW - Assessment

KW - Depression

KW - Primary care

KW - Psychometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847185272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847185272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 139

EP - 145

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

IS - 1-3

ER -