Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States

Jun Zhang, James Troendle, Uma M. Reddy, S. Katherine Laughon, D. Ware Branch, Ronald Burkman, Helain J. Landy, Judith U. Hibbard, Shoshana Haberman, Mildred M. Ramirez, Jennifer L. Bailit, Matthew K. Hoffman, Kimberly D. Gregory, Victor H. Gonzalez-Quintero, Michelle Kominiarek, Lee A. Learman, Christos G. Hatjis, Paul van Veldhuisen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

361 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Consortium on Safe Labor collected detailed labor and delivery information from 228,668 electronic medical records from 19 hospitals across the United States, 2002-2008.

RESULTS: The overall cesarean delivery rate was 30.5%. The 31.2% of nulliparous women were delivered by cesarean section. Prelabor repeat cesarean delivery due to a previous uterine scar contributed 30.9% of all cesarean sections. The 28.8% of women with a uterine scar had a trial of labor and the success rate was 57.1%. The 43.8% women attempting vaginal delivery had induction. Half of cesarean for dystocia in induced labor were performed before 6 cm of cervical dilation.

CONCLUSION: To decrease cesarean delivery rate in the United States, reducing primary cesarean delivery is the key. Increasing vaginal birth after previous cesarean rate is urgently needed. Cesarean section for dystocia should be avoided before the active phase is established, particularly in nulliparous women and in induced labor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)326.e1-326.e10
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume203
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cesarean Section
Induced Labor
Dystocia
Cicatrix
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Trial of Labor
Electronic Health Records
Dilatation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Zhang, J., Troendle, J., Reddy, U. M., Laughon, S. K., Branch, D. W., Burkman, R., ... van Veldhuisen, P. (2010). Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(4), 326.e1-326.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058

Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. / Zhang, Jun; Troendle, James; Reddy, Uma M.; Laughon, S. Katherine; Branch, D. Ware; Burkman, Ronald; Landy, Helain J.; Hibbard, Judith U.; Haberman, Shoshana; Ramirez, Mildred M.; Bailit, Jennifer L.; Hoffman, Matthew K.; Gregory, Kimberly D.; Gonzalez-Quintero, Victor H.; Kominiarek, Michelle; Learman, Lee A.; Hatjis, Christos G.; van Veldhuisen, Paul.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 203, No. 4, 01.10.2010, p. 326.e1-326.e10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, J, Troendle, J, Reddy, UM, Laughon, SK, Branch, DW, Burkman, R, Landy, HJ, Hibbard, JU, Haberman, S, Ramirez, MM, Bailit, JL, Hoffman, MK, Gregory, KD, Gonzalez-Quintero, VH, Kominiarek, M, Learman, LA, Hatjis, CG & van Veldhuisen, P 2010, 'Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 203, no. 4, pp. 326.e1-326.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058
Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010 Oct 1;203(4):326.e1-326.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058
Zhang, Jun ; Troendle, James ; Reddy, Uma M. ; Laughon, S. Katherine ; Branch, D. Ware ; Burkman, Ronald ; Landy, Helain J. ; Hibbard, Judith U. ; Haberman, Shoshana ; Ramirez, Mildred M. ; Bailit, Jennifer L. ; Hoffman, Matthew K. ; Gregory, Kimberly D. ; Gonzalez-Quintero, Victor H. ; Kominiarek, Michelle ; Learman, Lee A. ; Hatjis, Christos G. ; van Veldhuisen, Paul. / Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010 ; Vol. 203, No. 4. pp. 326.e1-326.e10.
@article{392b0818506c4eb4b225bc1016fcb8e9,
title = "Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To describe contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.STUDY DESIGN: Consortium on Safe Labor collected detailed labor and delivery information from 228,668 electronic medical records from 19 hospitals across the United States, 2002-2008.RESULTS: The overall cesarean delivery rate was 30.5{\%}. The 31.2{\%} of nulliparous women were delivered by cesarean section. Prelabor repeat cesarean delivery due to a previous uterine scar contributed 30.9{\%} of all cesarean sections. The 28.8{\%} of women with a uterine scar had a trial of labor and the success rate was 57.1{\%}. The 43.8{\%} women attempting vaginal delivery had induction. Half of cesarean for dystocia in induced labor were performed before 6 cm of cervical dilation.CONCLUSION: To decrease cesarean delivery rate in the United States, reducing primary cesarean delivery is the key. Increasing vaginal birth after previous cesarean rate is urgently needed. Cesarean section for dystocia should be avoided before the active phase is established, particularly in nulliparous women and in induced labor.",
author = "Jun Zhang and James Troendle and Reddy, {Uma M.} and Laughon, {S. Katherine} and Branch, {D. Ware} and Ronald Burkman and Landy, {Helain J.} and Hibbard, {Judith U.} and Shoshana Haberman and Ramirez, {Mildred M.} and Bailit, {Jennifer L.} and Hoffman, {Matthew K.} and Gregory, {Kimberly D.} and Gonzalez-Quintero, {Victor H.} and Michelle Kominiarek and Learman, {Lee A.} and Hatjis, {Christos G.} and {van Veldhuisen}, Paul",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
pages = "326.e1--326.e10",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States

AU - Zhang, Jun

AU - Troendle, James

AU - Reddy, Uma M.

AU - Laughon, S. Katherine

AU - Branch, D. Ware

AU - Burkman, Ronald

AU - Landy, Helain J.

AU - Hibbard, Judith U.

AU - Haberman, Shoshana

AU - Ramirez, Mildred M.

AU - Bailit, Jennifer L.

AU - Hoffman, Matthew K.

AU - Gregory, Kimberly D.

AU - Gonzalez-Quintero, Victor H.

AU - Kominiarek, Michelle

AU - Learman, Lee A.

AU - Hatjis, Christos G.

AU - van Veldhuisen, Paul

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To describe contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.STUDY DESIGN: Consortium on Safe Labor collected detailed labor and delivery information from 228,668 electronic medical records from 19 hospitals across the United States, 2002-2008.RESULTS: The overall cesarean delivery rate was 30.5%. The 31.2% of nulliparous women were delivered by cesarean section. Prelabor repeat cesarean delivery due to a previous uterine scar contributed 30.9% of all cesarean sections. The 28.8% of women with a uterine scar had a trial of labor and the success rate was 57.1%. The 43.8% women attempting vaginal delivery had induction. Half of cesarean for dystocia in induced labor were performed before 6 cm of cervical dilation.CONCLUSION: To decrease cesarean delivery rate in the United States, reducing primary cesarean delivery is the key. Increasing vaginal birth after previous cesarean rate is urgently needed. Cesarean section for dystocia should be avoided before the active phase is established, particularly in nulliparous women and in induced labor.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To describe contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.STUDY DESIGN: Consortium on Safe Labor collected detailed labor and delivery information from 228,668 electronic medical records from 19 hospitals across the United States, 2002-2008.RESULTS: The overall cesarean delivery rate was 30.5%. The 31.2% of nulliparous women were delivered by cesarean section. Prelabor repeat cesarean delivery due to a previous uterine scar contributed 30.9% of all cesarean sections. The 28.8% of women with a uterine scar had a trial of labor and the success rate was 57.1%. The 43.8% women attempting vaginal delivery had induction. Half of cesarean for dystocia in induced labor were performed before 6 cm of cervical dilation.CONCLUSION: To decrease cesarean delivery rate in the United States, reducing primary cesarean delivery is the key. Increasing vaginal birth after previous cesarean rate is urgently needed. Cesarean section for dystocia should be avoided before the active phase is established, particularly in nulliparous women and in induced labor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914112178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914112178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058

M3 - Article

C2 - 20708166

AN - SCOPUS:77957350618

VL - 203

SP - 326.e1-326.e10

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 4

ER -