Content validity and satisfaction with a stroke caregiver intervention program

Tamilyn Bakas, Carol J. Farran, Joan K. Austin, Barbara A. Given, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Linda Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Establishing evidence of content validity and satisfaction is an integral part of intervention research. The purpose of this article is to describe content validity and satisfaction relative to the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK), an 8-week follow-up program based on individualized assessment of stroke caregiver needs. Design and Methods: The TASK intervention enables caregivers to develop skills based on assessment of their own needs. During the development of the TASK program, 10 experts rated the validity of the TASK intervention components for accuracy, feasibility, acceptability, and problem relevance. After incorporating feedback from the experts, a randomized controlled clinical trial was instituted using a convenience sample of 40 stroke caregivers to determine satisfaction (usefulness, ease of use, and acceptability) with the TASK intervention (n=21) compared with an attention control group (n=19). Data collection occurred between March 2005 and June 2006. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t tests, and content analysis. Findings: Expert ratings on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being strongly agree, provided evidence of content validity (accuracy 4.71, feasibility 4.46, acceptability 4.40, problem relevance 4.67). Caregivers in the TASK group scored significantly higher than the attention control group on all satisfaction measures (usefulness p=.02; ease of use p=.02; acceptability p=.05). Qualitative comments from caregivers provided further evidence of satisfaction. Conclusions: Evidence of content validity and user satisfaction for the TASK intervention relative to an attention control group was found. Clinical Relevance: The TASK program may be a viable telephone-based program that can be implemented by nurses to support family caregivers during the first few months after stroke survivors are discharged home.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-375
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Telephone
Caregivers
Stroke
Control Groups
Survivors
Randomized Controlled Trials
Nurses
Research

Keywords

  • Family caregivers
  • Feasibility
  • Intervention studies
  • Needs assessment
  • Satisfaction
  • Stroke
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Content validity and satisfaction with a stroke caregiver intervention program. / Bakas, Tamilyn; Farran, Carol J.; Austin, Joan K.; Given, Barbara A.; Johnson, Elizabeth A.; Williams, Linda.

In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 41, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 368-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bakas, Tamilyn ; Farran, Carol J. ; Austin, Joan K. ; Given, Barbara A. ; Johnson, Elizabeth A. ; Williams, Linda. / Content validity and satisfaction with a stroke caregiver intervention program. In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2009 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 368-375.
@article{d366f29a6d9b48f48228206a2a487429,
title = "Content validity and satisfaction with a stroke caregiver intervention program",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: Establishing evidence of content validity and satisfaction is an integral part of intervention research. The purpose of this article is to describe content validity and satisfaction relative to the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK), an 8-week follow-up program based on individualized assessment of stroke caregiver needs. Design and Methods: The TASK intervention enables caregivers to develop skills based on assessment of their own needs. During the development of the TASK program, 10 experts rated the validity of the TASK intervention components for accuracy, feasibility, acceptability, and problem relevance. After incorporating feedback from the experts, a randomized controlled clinical trial was instituted using a convenience sample of 40 stroke caregivers to determine satisfaction (usefulness, ease of use, and acceptability) with the TASK intervention (n=21) compared with an attention control group (n=19). Data collection occurred between March 2005 and June 2006. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t tests, and content analysis. Findings: Expert ratings on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being strongly agree, provided evidence of content validity (accuracy 4.71, feasibility 4.46, acceptability 4.40, problem relevance 4.67). Caregivers in the TASK group scored significantly higher than the attention control group on all satisfaction measures (usefulness p=.02; ease of use p=.02; acceptability p=.05). Qualitative comments from caregivers provided further evidence of satisfaction. Conclusions: Evidence of content validity and user satisfaction for the TASK intervention relative to an attention control group was found. Clinical Relevance: The TASK program may be a viable telephone-based program that can be implemented by nurses to support family caregivers during the first few months after stroke survivors are discharged home.",
keywords = "Family caregivers, Feasibility, Intervention studies, Needs assessment, Satisfaction, Stroke, Validity",
author = "Tamilyn Bakas and Farran, {Carol J.} and Austin, {Joan K.} and Given, {Barbara A.} and Johnson, {Elizabeth A.} and Linda Williams",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01282.x",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "368--375",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Scholarship",
issn = "1527-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Content validity and satisfaction with a stroke caregiver intervention program

AU - Bakas, Tamilyn

AU - Farran, Carol J.

AU - Austin, Joan K.

AU - Given, Barbara A.

AU - Johnson, Elizabeth A.

AU - Williams, Linda

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Background and Purpose: Establishing evidence of content validity and satisfaction is an integral part of intervention research. The purpose of this article is to describe content validity and satisfaction relative to the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK), an 8-week follow-up program based on individualized assessment of stroke caregiver needs. Design and Methods: The TASK intervention enables caregivers to develop skills based on assessment of their own needs. During the development of the TASK program, 10 experts rated the validity of the TASK intervention components for accuracy, feasibility, acceptability, and problem relevance. After incorporating feedback from the experts, a randomized controlled clinical trial was instituted using a convenience sample of 40 stroke caregivers to determine satisfaction (usefulness, ease of use, and acceptability) with the TASK intervention (n=21) compared with an attention control group (n=19). Data collection occurred between March 2005 and June 2006. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t tests, and content analysis. Findings: Expert ratings on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being strongly agree, provided evidence of content validity (accuracy 4.71, feasibility 4.46, acceptability 4.40, problem relevance 4.67). Caregivers in the TASK group scored significantly higher than the attention control group on all satisfaction measures (usefulness p=.02; ease of use p=.02; acceptability p=.05). Qualitative comments from caregivers provided further evidence of satisfaction. Conclusions: Evidence of content validity and user satisfaction for the TASK intervention relative to an attention control group was found. Clinical Relevance: The TASK program may be a viable telephone-based program that can be implemented by nurses to support family caregivers during the first few months after stroke survivors are discharged home.

AB - Background and Purpose: Establishing evidence of content validity and satisfaction is an integral part of intervention research. The purpose of this article is to describe content validity and satisfaction relative to the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK), an 8-week follow-up program based on individualized assessment of stroke caregiver needs. Design and Methods: The TASK intervention enables caregivers to develop skills based on assessment of their own needs. During the development of the TASK program, 10 experts rated the validity of the TASK intervention components for accuracy, feasibility, acceptability, and problem relevance. After incorporating feedback from the experts, a randomized controlled clinical trial was instituted using a convenience sample of 40 stroke caregivers to determine satisfaction (usefulness, ease of use, and acceptability) with the TASK intervention (n=21) compared with an attention control group (n=19). Data collection occurred between March 2005 and June 2006. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t tests, and content analysis. Findings: Expert ratings on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being strongly agree, provided evidence of content validity (accuracy 4.71, feasibility 4.46, acceptability 4.40, problem relevance 4.67). Caregivers in the TASK group scored significantly higher than the attention control group on all satisfaction measures (usefulness p=.02; ease of use p=.02; acceptability p=.05). Qualitative comments from caregivers provided further evidence of satisfaction. Conclusions: Evidence of content validity and user satisfaction for the TASK intervention relative to an attention control group was found. Clinical Relevance: The TASK program may be a viable telephone-based program that can be implemented by nurses to support family caregivers during the first few months after stroke survivors are discharged home.

KW - Family caregivers

KW - Feasibility

KW - Intervention studies

KW - Needs assessment

KW - Satisfaction

KW - Stroke

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70450246913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70450246913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01282.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01282.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19941582

AN - SCOPUS:70450246913

VL - 41

SP - 368

EP - 375

JO - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

JF - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

SN - 1527-6546

IS - 4

ER -