Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: A contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality

Dipen J. Parekh, W. Barritt Gilbert, Michael Koch, Joseph A. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)852-855
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urinary Diversion
Morbidity
Mortality
Cystectomy
Operating Rooms
Operative Time
Hospitalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit : A contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality. / Parekh, Dipen J.; Gilbert, W. Barritt; Koch, Michael; Smith, Joseph A.

In: Urology, Vol. 55, No. 6, 06.2000, p. 852-855.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c620fd0eb3b42eabe77840762e96d00,
title = "Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: A contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality",
abstract = "Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4{\%} of those with a neobladder and 1.2{\%} of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.",
author = "Parekh, {Dipen J.} and Gilbert, {W. Barritt} and Michael Koch and Smith, {Joseph A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "852--855",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit

T2 - A contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality

AU - Parekh, Dipen J.

AU - Gilbert, W. Barritt

AU - Koch, Michael

AU - Smith, Joseph A.

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034027292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034027292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 10840090

AN - SCOPUS:0034027292

VL - 55

SP - 852

EP - 855

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 6

ER -