Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the frequency of contrast nephropathy after computed tomography angiography (CTA) to rule out pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods: We prospectively followed patients undergoing CTA for PE, while in the ED, for 45 days. Patients who refused follow-up or were receiving hemodialysis were excluded. Severe renal failure was defined as an increase in creatinine ≥ 3.0 mg dL-1 or a need for hemodialysis within the follow-up period. Patients were also followed for laboratory-defined contrast nephropathy, defined as an increase in creatinine of > 0.5 mg dL-1 or > 25%, within seven days following CTA. Results: A total of 1224 patients were followed, and 354[29%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 26-32%] patients had paired (preCTA and post-CTA) creatinine measurements. None developed renal failure (0/1224; 0%, CI: 0-0.3%). 44 patients developed laboratory-defined contrast nephropathy, corresponding to an overall frequency of 4% (44/1224; CI: 3-5%) and 12% (44/354; 95% CI: 9-16%) among those with paired creatinine measurements. Conclusions: Following CTA for PE, the incidence of severe renal failure was very low, but the incidence of laboratory-defined contrast nephropathy (4% overall and 12% of those with paired measurements) was higher than expected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-54
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Contrast media
  • Creatinine
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Renal failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this