Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth

Miguel ángel Fernández-Barrera, Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís, Juan Fernando Casanova-Rosado, Martha Mendoza-Rodríguez, Mauricio Escoffié-Ramírez, Alejandro José Casanova-Rosado, José de Jesús Navarrete-Hernández, Gerardo Maupome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Tooth loss is an easily identifiable outcome that summarizes a complex suite of factors in an individual's history of dental disease and its treatment by dental services over a lifetime. Assessment of overall tooth loss data is essential for epidemiologically evaluating the adequacy of dental care provided at a systems level, as well as for placing in context tooth loss for non-disease causes. For example, when derived from prosthetic treatment planning, the latter may unfortunately lead to some teeth being extracted (pulled) for the sake of better comprehensive clinical results. The objective of the present manuscript was to identify the contribution to overall tooth loss, by extraction of permanent teeth because of prosthetic treatment reasons. Material and Methods. A cross-sectional study included sex, age, total number of extractions performed by subject, sextant (anterior vs. posterior), group of teeth (incisors, canines, premolars and molars), upper or lower arch, and the main reason underlying extraction (extraction for any reason vs. prosthetic treatment), in patients 18 years of age and older seeking care at a dental school clinic in Mexico. A multivariate logistic regression model was generated. Results. A total of 749 teeth were extracted in 331 patients; 161 teeth (21.5% of total) were extracted for explicit prosthetic treatment indications. As age increased, the likelihood of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons increased 3% (ORD1:03; p < 0.001). Women (ORD1:57; p < 0.05) were more likely to be in this situation, and molars (ORD2:70; p < 0.001) were most at risk. As the total number of extractions increased, the risk of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons decreased (OR = 0.94; p < 0.05). Conclusions. A significant amount (21.5%) of the extractions of permanent teeth were performed for prosthetic reasons in this dental school clinical environment; age, sex, type of tooth, and the total number of extractions moderated such pattern.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2015
JournalPeerJ
Volume2016
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Tooth Extraction
Prosthetics
Tooth Loss
Tooth
teeth
Dental Schools
Therapeutics
Logistic Models
Cuspid
Dental Clinics
Stomatognathic Diseases
Dental Care
Manuscripts
Sextants
Bicuspid
Incisor
Mexico
Cross-Sectional Studies
Gear teeth
Arches

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Dental extraction
  • Mexico
  • Oral health
  • Pre-prosthetic treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Fernández-Barrera, M. Á., Medina-Solís, C. E., Casanova-Rosado, J. F., Mendoza-Rodríguez, M., Escoffié-Ramírez, M., Casanova-Rosado, A. J., ... Maupome, G. (2016). Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth. PeerJ, 2016(7), [e2015]. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.2015

Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth. / Fernández-Barrera, Miguel ángel; Medina-Solís, Carlo Eduardo; Casanova-Rosado, Juan Fernando; Mendoza-Rodríguez, Martha; Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio; Casanova-Rosado, Alejandro José; Navarrete-Hernández, José de Jesús; Maupome, Gerardo.

In: PeerJ, Vol. 2016, No. 7, e2015, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fernández-Barrera, MÁ, Medina-Solís, CE, Casanova-Rosado, JF, Mendoza-Rodríguez, M, Escoffié-Ramírez, M, Casanova-Rosado, AJ, Navarrete-Hernández, JDJ & Maupome, G 2016, 'Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth', PeerJ, vol. 2016, no. 7, e2015. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.2015
Fernández-Barrera MÁ, Medina-Solís CE, Casanova-Rosado JF, Mendoza-Rodríguez M, Escoffié-Ramírez M, Casanova-Rosado AJ et al. Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth. PeerJ. 2016;2016(7). e2015. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.2015
Fernández-Barrera, Miguel ángel ; Medina-Solís, Carlo Eduardo ; Casanova-Rosado, Juan Fernando ; Mendoza-Rodríguez, Martha ; Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio ; Casanova-Rosado, Alejandro José ; Navarrete-Hernández, José de Jesús ; Maupome, Gerardo. / Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth. In: PeerJ. 2016 ; Vol. 2016, No. 7.
@article{13a6296507504c4ca12a5d38d6fb6ca4,
title = "Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth",
abstract = "Background. Tooth loss is an easily identifiable outcome that summarizes a complex suite of factors in an individual's history of dental disease and its treatment by dental services over a lifetime. Assessment of overall tooth loss data is essential for epidemiologically evaluating the adequacy of dental care provided at a systems level, as well as for placing in context tooth loss for non-disease causes. For example, when derived from prosthetic treatment planning, the latter may unfortunately lead to some teeth being extracted (pulled) for the sake of better comprehensive clinical results. The objective of the present manuscript was to identify the contribution to overall tooth loss, by extraction of permanent teeth because of prosthetic treatment reasons. Material and Methods. A cross-sectional study included sex, age, total number of extractions performed by subject, sextant (anterior vs. posterior), group of teeth (incisors, canines, premolars and molars), upper or lower arch, and the main reason underlying extraction (extraction for any reason vs. prosthetic treatment), in patients 18 years of age and older seeking care at a dental school clinic in Mexico. A multivariate logistic regression model was generated. Results. A total of 749 teeth were extracted in 331 patients; 161 teeth (21.5{\%} of total) were extracted for explicit prosthetic treatment indications. As age increased, the likelihood of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons increased 3{\%} (ORD1:03; p < 0.001). Women (ORD1:57; p < 0.05) were more likely to be in this situation, and molars (ORD2:70; p < 0.001) were most at risk. As the total number of extractions increased, the risk of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons decreased (OR = 0.94; p < 0.05). Conclusions. A significant amount (21.5{\%}) of the extractions of permanent teeth were performed for prosthetic reasons in this dental school clinical environment; age, sex, type of tooth, and the total number of extractions moderated such pattern.",
keywords = "Adults, Dental extraction, Mexico, Oral health, Pre-prosthetic treatment",
author = "Fern{\'a}ndez-Barrera, {Miguel {\'a}ngel} and Medina-Sol{\'i}s, {Carlo Eduardo} and Casanova-Rosado, {Juan Fernando} and Martha Mendoza-Rodr{\'i}guez and Mauricio Escoffi{\'e}-Ram{\'i}rez and Casanova-Rosado, {Alejandro Jos{\'e}} and Navarrete-Hern{\'a}ndez, {Jos{\'e} de Jes{\'u}s} and Gerardo Maupome",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.7717/PEERJ.2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2016",
journal = "PeerJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PeerJ",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contribution of prosthetic treatment considerations for dental extractions of permanent teeth

AU - Fernández-Barrera, Miguel ángel

AU - Medina-Solís, Carlo Eduardo

AU - Casanova-Rosado, Juan Fernando

AU - Mendoza-Rodríguez, Martha

AU - Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio

AU - Casanova-Rosado, Alejandro José

AU - Navarrete-Hernández, José de Jesús

AU - Maupome, Gerardo

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background. Tooth loss is an easily identifiable outcome that summarizes a complex suite of factors in an individual's history of dental disease and its treatment by dental services over a lifetime. Assessment of overall tooth loss data is essential for epidemiologically evaluating the adequacy of dental care provided at a systems level, as well as for placing in context tooth loss for non-disease causes. For example, when derived from prosthetic treatment planning, the latter may unfortunately lead to some teeth being extracted (pulled) for the sake of better comprehensive clinical results. The objective of the present manuscript was to identify the contribution to overall tooth loss, by extraction of permanent teeth because of prosthetic treatment reasons. Material and Methods. A cross-sectional study included sex, age, total number of extractions performed by subject, sextant (anterior vs. posterior), group of teeth (incisors, canines, premolars and molars), upper or lower arch, and the main reason underlying extraction (extraction for any reason vs. prosthetic treatment), in patients 18 years of age and older seeking care at a dental school clinic in Mexico. A multivariate logistic regression model was generated. Results. A total of 749 teeth were extracted in 331 patients; 161 teeth (21.5% of total) were extracted for explicit prosthetic treatment indications. As age increased, the likelihood of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons increased 3% (ORD1:03; p < 0.001). Women (ORD1:57; p < 0.05) were more likely to be in this situation, and molars (ORD2:70; p < 0.001) were most at risk. As the total number of extractions increased, the risk of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons decreased (OR = 0.94; p < 0.05). Conclusions. A significant amount (21.5%) of the extractions of permanent teeth were performed for prosthetic reasons in this dental school clinical environment; age, sex, type of tooth, and the total number of extractions moderated such pattern.

AB - Background. Tooth loss is an easily identifiable outcome that summarizes a complex suite of factors in an individual's history of dental disease and its treatment by dental services over a lifetime. Assessment of overall tooth loss data is essential for epidemiologically evaluating the adequacy of dental care provided at a systems level, as well as for placing in context tooth loss for non-disease causes. For example, when derived from prosthetic treatment planning, the latter may unfortunately lead to some teeth being extracted (pulled) for the sake of better comprehensive clinical results. The objective of the present manuscript was to identify the contribution to overall tooth loss, by extraction of permanent teeth because of prosthetic treatment reasons. Material and Methods. A cross-sectional study included sex, age, total number of extractions performed by subject, sextant (anterior vs. posterior), group of teeth (incisors, canines, premolars and molars), upper or lower arch, and the main reason underlying extraction (extraction for any reason vs. prosthetic treatment), in patients 18 years of age and older seeking care at a dental school clinic in Mexico. A multivariate logistic regression model was generated. Results. A total of 749 teeth were extracted in 331 patients; 161 teeth (21.5% of total) were extracted for explicit prosthetic treatment indications. As age increased, the likelihood of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons increased 3% (ORD1:03; p < 0.001). Women (ORD1:57; p < 0.05) were more likely to be in this situation, and molars (ORD2:70; p < 0.001) were most at risk. As the total number of extractions increased, the risk of having an extraction for prosthetic reasons decreased (OR = 0.94; p < 0.05). Conclusions. A significant amount (21.5%) of the extractions of permanent teeth were performed for prosthetic reasons in this dental school clinical environment; age, sex, type of tooth, and the total number of extractions moderated such pattern.

KW - Adults

KW - Dental extraction

KW - Mexico

KW - Oral health

KW - Pre-prosthetic treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992121952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992121952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7717/PEERJ.2015

DO - 10.7717/PEERJ.2015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992121952

VL - 2016

JO - PeerJ

JF - PeerJ

SN - 2167-8359

IS - 7

M1 - e2015

ER -